RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      교사의 인식론적 신념과 수업설계 행위와의 관련성 탐색 = The Teacher`s Epistemological Belief and Instructional Design Practice

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101959408

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The primary purpose of the study was to examine the differences between perception of instruction design, the extent of instruction design practice, and the concrete instruction design methods in comparison to the teacher`s level of epistemological belief. The epistemological belief questionnaires developed by Chan and Elliott(2004) were used to choose 69 sophisticated, naive and mixed teachers. The instructional design questionnaires developed using some instructional design research and the systematic planning method of Reiser & Dick(1996). The questionnaires were used to obtain information on instructional design practice. The findings of this study were as follow: first, according to the level of epistemological belief, the perception of instructional design was different; second, the instructional design practice was not different; and third, according to the level of epistemological belief, the concrete instructional activity design and the evaluation design were different. With these results, the study proposes that epistemological belief have an important role to design the instruction. Therefore, epistemological belief should be included in teachers` training and the teacher should give this matter thought.
      번역하기

      The primary purpose of the study was to examine the differences between perception of instruction design, the extent of instruction design practice, and the concrete instruction design methods in comparison to the teacher`s level of epistemological be...

      The primary purpose of the study was to examine the differences between perception of instruction design, the extent of instruction design practice, and the concrete instruction design methods in comparison to the teacher`s level of epistemological belief. The epistemological belief questionnaires developed by Chan and Elliott(2004) were used to choose 69 sophisticated, naive and mixed teachers. The instructional design questionnaires developed using some instructional design research and the systematic planning method of Reiser & Dick(1996). The questionnaires were used to obtain information on instructional design practice. The findings of this study were as follow: first, according to the level of epistemological belief, the perception of instructional design was different; second, the instructional design practice was not different; and third, according to the level of epistemological belief, the concrete instructional activity design and the evaluation design were different. With these results, the study proposes that epistemological belief have an important role to design the instruction. Therefore, epistemological belief should be included in teachers` training and the teacher should give this matter thought.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 정혜영, "초등학교 현직교사와 교생간의 사회과 수업계획 과정 비교연구" 14 (14): 205-223, 2001

      2 최지연, "초등 예비 교사의 실과 수업 계획 과정에 관한 질적 사례 연구" 한국초등교육학회 19 (19): 477-500, 2006

      3 김현주, "철학자로서의 교사 : 교사 전문성의 재개념화" 한국교육철학학회 (42) : 109-133, 2008

      4 변영계, "수업설계" 학지사 2003

      5 유한구, "수업 전문성의 두 측면:기술과 이해" 18 (18): 69-84, 2001

      6 안효일, "수업 전문성의 근거 : 지식의 통합성" 한국초등교육학회 20 (20): 119-144, 2007

      7 박기용, "교수설계 모형과 실천 간의 차이와 원인 분석" 한국교육공학회 23 (23): 1-30, 2007

      8 조윤정, "교사의 인식론적 신념과 교사효능감, 교수전략과의 관련성 탐구" 한국열린교육학회 16 (16): 1-20, 2008

      9 박기용, "교사의 수업계획 과정에 관한 사례연구" 한국교원교육학회 25 (25): 379-405, 2008

      10 정미경, "교사의 교육과정 변화 능력(change capacity) 함양을 위한 적응적 전문성(adaptive expertise) 신장 방안" 교육과학연구소 37 (37): 25-45, 2006

      1 정혜영, "초등학교 현직교사와 교생간의 사회과 수업계획 과정 비교연구" 14 (14): 205-223, 2001

      2 최지연, "초등 예비 교사의 실과 수업 계획 과정에 관한 질적 사례 연구" 한국초등교육학회 19 (19): 477-500, 2006

      3 김현주, "철학자로서의 교사 : 교사 전문성의 재개념화" 한국교육철학학회 (42) : 109-133, 2008

      4 변영계, "수업설계" 학지사 2003

      5 유한구, "수업 전문성의 두 측면:기술과 이해" 18 (18): 69-84, 2001

      6 안효일, "수업 전문성의 근거 : 지식의 통합성" 한국초등교육학회 20 (20): 119-144, 2007

      7 박기용, "교수설계 모형과 실천 간의 차이와 원인 분석" 한국교육공학회 23 (23): 1-30, 2007

      8 조윤정, "교사의 인식론적 신념과 교사효능감, 교수전략과의 관련성 탐구" 한국열린교육학회 16 (16): 1-20, 2008

      9 박기용, "교사의 수업계획 과정에 관한 사례연구" 한국교원교육학회 25 (25): 379-405, 2008

      10 정미경, "교사의 교육과정 변화 능력(change capacity) 함양을 위한 적응적 전문성(adaptive expertise) 신장 방안" 교육과학연구소 37 (37): 25-45, 2006

      11 이화자, "교사 전문성 개발의 실천적 사례 비교연구" 글로벌영어교육학회 13 (13): 1-35, 2008

      12 김도헌, "교사 수업계획과정의 실행절차 및 사고과정에 관한 연구: 수업체제설계이론에 주는 시사점을 중심으로" 한양대학교 1996

      13 유한구, "교과이론과 교과정책" 성경재 2002

      14 김경연, "개인변인에 따른 교사들의 다차원적 인식론적 신념과 교수-학습관 간의 관계" 교육문제연구소 (26) : 205-230, 2006

      15 김인, "‘학교교육과정’의 재해석: 교사의 역할을 중심으로" 한국교육과정학회 21 (21): 7-384, 2003

      16 Belenky,M.F.,Clinchy,B.M.,Goldberger,N.R.,& Tarule,J.M, "Women's ways of knowing: The development of self, voice and mind" Basic Books 1986

      17 Schoenfeld,A.H, "When good teaching leads to bad results: The disasters of "well-taught" mathematics courses" 23 (23): 145-166, 1988

      18 Sardo-Brown,D, "Twelve middle school teachers' Planning" 89 (89): 69-87, 1988

      19 Reiser, R. A., "Trend and issues in instructional design and technology" Merrill Prentice Hall 2002

      20 Kuhn,D, "The skills of argument" Cambridge University Press 1991

      21 Simon,H.A, "The science of artificial(2nd ed.)" MIT Press 1981

      22 Hofer, B. K, "The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning" 67 (67): 88-140, 1997

      23 Schommer,M, "The Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension" 82 : 498-504, 1990

      24 Schraw, G, "Teachers' epistemological world views and educational practices" 8 (8): 99-148, 2002

      25 Clark, C, "Teacher's thought processes. In Handbook of research on teaching" MacMillan Publishing Company 255-296, 1986

      26 Martin,B.L, "Teacher's planning processes: Does ISD make a difference?" 3 (3): 53-73, 1990

      27 Schommer,M, "Synthesizing epistemological belief research: tentative understandings and provocative confusions" 6 (6): 293-319, 1994

      28 Pajares,F, "Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings" 66 : 543-578, 1992

      29 Clark, C. M, "Second-generation research on teacher's planning, intentions, and routines. In Effective teaching: Current research" McCutchan Publishing Corporation 183-201, 1991

      30 Chai, C. S, "Rethinking classroom-oriented instructional development models to mediate instructional planning in technology-enhanced learning environments" 24 : 2002-2013, 2008

      31 Ertmer,P, "Responsive instructional design: Scaffolding the adoption and change process" 41 (41): 33-38, 2001

      32 Chan, K. W, "Relational analysis of personal epistemology and conceptions about teaching and learning" 20 : 817-831, 2004

      33 Cheng, May M. H, "Pre-service teacher education students' epistemological belief and their conceptions of teaching" 25 : 319-327, 2009

      34 Bullough,R, "Planning and the first year of teaching" 13 : 231-250, 1987

      35 Driscoll, M. P, "Perspectives on instructional planning: How to teachers and instructional designers conceive of ISD planning practices?" 34 (34): 34-42, 1994

      36 Perry,W.G.Jr, "Patterns of development in thought and value of student in a liberal art college: A validation of a schema"

      37 Visscher-Voerman, I, "Paradigms in the theory and practice of education and training design" 52 (52): 69-89, 2004

      38 Ryan,M.P, "Monitoring text comprehension: Individual differences in epistemological standards" 76 (76): 249-258, 1984

      39 Baxter Magolda,M.B, "Knowing and reasoning in college: Gender-related patterns in students' intellectual development" Jossey-Bass 1992

      40 Mauldin, M. P, "Is instructional development a paradigm for public education? In Instructional development paradigms" Educational Technology Publications. 129-140, 1997

      41 Hannum,W, "Instructional systems development: A 30 year retrospective" 45 (45): 5-21, 2005

      42 Martin, B. L, "Instructional systems design and public school" 38 (38): 61-75, 1990

      43 Reiser, R. A., "Instructional planning: A guide for teacher(2nd edition)" Allyn and Bacon 1996

      44 Moallem, M, "Instructional design models and teacher thinking: Toward a new conceptual model for research and development" 38 (38): 5-22, 1998

      45 Alexander,R, "In search of good primary practice. In Comtemporary Issues in Teaching and Learning" Routledge 57-75, 1996

      46 Kagan,D.M, "Implications of research on teacher belief" 27 (27): 65-90, 1992

      47 Kerr,S, "How teachers design their materials: Implications for instructional design" 10 : 363-378, 1981

      48 Chan, K. W., "Exploratory study of Hong Kong teacher education students' epistemological Beliefs: Cultural perspectives and implications on beliefs research" 27 (27): 392-414, 2002

      49 Schommer-Aikins,M, "Explaining the epistemological belief system: Introducing the embedded systemic model and coordinated research approach" 39 (39): 19-29, 2004

      50 Reiser,R.A, "Examining the planning practices of teachers: Reflections on three years of research" 34 (34): 11-16, 1994

      51 Chai, C. S, "Epistemological beliefs on teaching and learning: a survey among pre-service teachers in Singapore" 43 (43): 285-298, 2006

      52 Schommer, M, "Epistemological beliefs and mathematical text comprehension: Believing it is simple does not make it so" 82 : 435-443, 1992

      53 Hashweh,M.Z, "Effects of science teachers' epistemological beliefs in teaching" 33 (33): 47-63, 1996

      54 Young, A. C, "Do superior teachers employ systematic instructional planning procedures? A descriptive study" 46 (46): 65-78, 1998

      55 Schraw, G, "Development and validation of the Epistemic Belief Inventory. In Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing" Erlbaum 103-118, 2002

      56 King, P. M, "Developing reflective judgment: Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults" Jossey-Bass 1994

      57 Rowland,G, "Designing and instructional design" 41 (41): 79-91, 1993

      58 Goldschmidt,G, "Design. In Encyclopedia of Creativity" 1 : 525-535, 1999

      59 Wood, P., "Critical elements in the design and analysis of studies of epistemology in Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing" Erlbaum 231-260, 2002

      60 Brownlee, J, "Changing epistemological beliefs in pre-service teaching education students" 6 : 247-268, 2001

      61 Moallem,M, "An expert teacher's thinking and teaching and instructional design models and principles: An ethnographic study" 46 (46): 37-64, 1998

      62 Moallem,M, "An experienced teacher's model of thinking and teaching" Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL. 1993

      63 Driscoll,M.P, "Alternative views"

      64 Brantley-Dias, L, "A practical design model for novice teachers" 47 (47): 33-38, 2007

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 3.7 3.7 3.26
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      2.89 2.68 3.751 0.75
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼