실학實學 개념의 적합성 또는 부적합성에 관한 연구 = A Study on Conceptual Suitability or Unfitness of Silhak

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper aims to study on conceptual suitability or unfitness of Silhak(實 學). It is general that by criticizing Chujahak(朱子學) or beyond the limitation of Seonglihak(性理學), Silhak has developed practical tendency to reforming the society in the middle and end of Chosen Dynasty, related to the context of Korean national reflection in modern times. However, it is unfortunate to be understood. As presented in Chosenwangjosillok(『朝鮮王朝實錄』), there has been a few usages in the term ``Silhak``. In short, it was different from its contemporary meaning. At that time, it was usually used to have the meaning of Gyunghak(經學), compared to Sajanghak(詞章學), or rarely, of ``the true study`` or ``the practical study``. Therefore, it is to claim that its conception has been manipulated or exaggerated very seriously. Since 1930s, in particular, its conception has been misused in interpreting works of Jung Yak-Yong by some scholars, such as Jung In-Bo, Moon Il-Pyung and An Jae-Hong, who tried to apply the term to overcome the Japanese colonial era symbolised as modernity based on the future life of Korea. Even though their attempt has led to have crucial discussions on the conceptions of Silhak, it has an unnecessary result that there has been a new and totally different understanding of Silhak in South Korea, North Korea, China, Japan, etc., which means that the unsustainable conception of Silhak has been one of major problems in studying of Silhak. To give an practical solution, I would try to make sense of ``time spirit`` whose scholars studied Silhak in the middle and end of Chosen Dynasty. A problem, however, is that a scholar group in the name of Bukhakpa(北學派) had certain links and bonds. This is because many scholars studying of Silhak were usually features out of the main stream, which made them it difficult to form any various groups. That is to say, it seems to be natural that they have dreamed of utopian imaginations less than of overlapping points in reality. To sum up, it would be concluded at least that any approach to human lives and thoughts in the given conceptions of Silhak, e.g. ethical thoughts of Silhak, enables us to be indifferentiated to take its true meaning and time spirit of Chosen Dynasty. To be disenchanted of its social roles in Chosen Dynasty, fundamentally, it should be escaped from the wrong net of illusions and sings in understanding Silhak in certain eclectic steps.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 한국공자학회, "현암 이을호 연구" 심산출판사 2010

2 주홍성, "한국철학사상사" 예문서원 1994

3 이을호, "한국실학의 발전사적 연구" 전남대 호남문화연구소 1975

4 小川晴久, "한국실학과 일본" 한울아카데미 1995

5 천관우, "한국사의 재발견" 일조각 1974

6 김용섭, "최근의 실학연구에 대하여" 역사교육연구회 6 : 1962

7 천관우, "조선후기 실학의 개념재론" 고려대 민족문화연구소 6 : 1970

8 지두환, "조선후기 실학연구의 문제점과 방향" 태동고전연구소 3 : 1987

9 한형조, "조선유학의 거장들" 문학동네 2008

10 지두환, "조선시대 사상사의 재조명" 역사문화 1998

11 강정훈, "정약용의 형정사상 연구 : 『흠흠신서』에 대한 윤리문화적 이해를 중심으로" 동국대학교 대학원 2008

12 홍이섭, "정약용의 정치경제사상연구" 한국연구도서관 1959

13 노현구, "자동차 건설기계" 두산동아(주) 2010

14 한우근, "이조후기의 사회와 사상" 을유문화사 1961

15 한우근, "이조 ‘실학’의 개념재론 -윤증의 실학관-" 동국대학교 6 : 1960

16 한우근, "이조 ‘실학’의 개념에 대하여" 진단학회 19 : 1958

17 다산학연구원, "이을호전서" 예문서원 2000

18 민영규, "위당 정인보선생의 행장에 나타난 몇 개의 문제: 實學原始" 연세대 국학연구원 (13) : 1972

19 주칠성, "실학파의 철학사상" 예문서원 1996

20 윤사순, "실학적 경학관의 특색" 전남대 호남문화연구소 1975

21 한국사상사연구회, "실학의 철학" 예문서원 1996

22 이우성, "실학연구입문" 일조각 1973

23 한영우, "실학연구의 어제와 오늘, In 다시, 실학이란 무엇인가" 푸른역사 2007

24 이상은, "실학사상의 형성과 전개" 26 (26): 1972

25 이을호, "실학사상의 철학적 측면" 한국사상연구회 13 : 1975

26 윤사순, "신실학사상론" 예문서원 1996

27 천관우, "반계유형원연구" 역사학회 2 : 1952

28 김용옥, "독기학설" 통나무 1990

29 한림대 한국학연구소, "다시, 실학이란 무엇인가" 푸른역사 2007

30 전해종, "釋實學" 진단학회 20 : 1959

31 "http://sillok.history.go.kr"

32 "<교수신문> 역사비평 기획시리즈 5ㆍ6ㆍ7ㆍ9 5. 2007년 4월 9일자 5면 지두환ㆍ한영우(인터뷰) 6. 2007년 4월 16일자 5면 이헌창ㆍ정순우 7. 2007년 4월 23일자 6-7면 심경호ㆍ진재교 9. 2007년 5월 7일자 9면 고동환"