假登記 擔保에 관한 硏究

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

It is a well-known fact that provisional registration security is a security mechanism in the form of provisional registration. It was originally used as the form of provisional registration security accompanying a promise of return by substitutes or a promise of sales, but it has been gradually developed to form a new independent security mechanism.
In current practies in the business world, provisional registration security is usually exploited to avoid the procedural difficulties of the typical security mechanism, i.e. mortgage. However, it is likely to be used only for the convenience of creditors and for the effect of obtaining ownership; as a result it may cause adverse effects on debtors.
Therefore the purpose of this article is to define the concept of provisional registration security and to conduct a proper evaluation through legal construction and futremore to provide a theory of registration.
First, provisional registration security is defined as follows :
It is a kind of security mechanism for the satisfaction of monetary indebtedness by making provisional registration with an agreement that in case of any default of indebteness the creditor may obtain the ownership Of the underlying assets in accordance with the promise to return by substitutes or the promise of sales.
The legal construction is as follows:
Avoiding the negative and superficial construction based on the traditional idea of ownership and looking directly at the real function as a security, it is deemed resonable to build up a new theory regarding provisional registration security as a kind of special security.
Second, the contract of establishment of provisional registration security shall be identified as a kind of action creating real rights.
Related to the extinction of provisional registration security there exists a problem regarding the time to exercise the right to recovery.
The conclusion is as follows:
The problem may arise out of two different cases; the first one is liquidation by transfer and the second is liquidation by disposition. In the case of the former, the time of extinction will be when the liquidated amount is paid; in the case of the latter , the main registration in the name of a third person will be completed.
Third, there may arise problems regarding the effects of provisional registration security between the contract parties.
1. Regarding the extent of secured indebtedness, the cost of enforcement should be included in addition to the principal, interest liquidated damages and penalty.
2. Regarding the right to use the secured objects, given that the theories and case laws have accepted legal superficies created by customs, legal superficies will be easily recognized.
3. Regarding the exercise of the right of provisional registrations security, in case of liquidation, the duty of liquidation should be granted and nonliquidation contracts or postliquidation contracts should have no effect.
Regarding the method of liquidation, liquidation by transfer is thought of a principal method and the duty of a security holder to pay the liquidation amount after the liquidation process is to be simultaneously performed with the duty of a debtor and or establisher of security to complete the main registration.
Persons who may have claims for the liquidated amount shall be limited to debtors, establishers of security and a third person who has acquired the secured objects.
Fourth, regarding the external effects of provisional registration security, there exists on important problem in connection with the real estate auction, from the viewpoint of the treatment provisional registration security whether to allow the participation in auction procedure.
It is not allowed under the existing laws (civil law); however, its existence as a seal security should be fully recognized and recommended. In such case it is also recommendable that persons with the right of provisional registration security participate in the auction procedure maintaining its state of provisional registration and claim preferential payment. However, in case provisional registration security is considered as the real right of security, it will be appropriate not to be allowed, considering the reality of provisional registration security. But it may be recommendable to recognize exceptions in some cases to comply with actual demands.
The second question is that whether it is possible to privately exercise provisional registration security rights excluding on-going auction procedures. According to the existing laws it is virtually impossible to prevent a person who has the right of provisional registration security from claimig main registration and entering court proceedings as on interested third party.
However, in case provisional registration security is considering as the real right of security, it will be appropriate not to be allowed, considering the realty of provisional registration security.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 목차 = ⅰ
• ABSTRACT = ⅵ
• Ⅰ. 序論 = 1
• Ⅱ. 從來의 判例·學說과 假登記擔保法 = 3
• 1. 判例·學說 = 3
• (1) 判例 = 3
• (2) 學說 = 7
• 2. 假登記 擔保法 = 8
• (1) 立法經緯 = 8
• (2) 主要骨字 = 9
• Ⅲ. 日本의 判例·學說과 假登記擔保法 = 11
• 1. 判例·學說 = 11
• (1) 判例 = 11
• (2) 學說 = 13
• 2. 日本 假登記擔保法 = 14
• (1) 立法經緯 = 14
• (2) 主要骨字 = 16
• Ⅳ. 假登記擔保의 內容 = 18
• 1. 假登記擔保의 設定 = 18
• (1) 當事者 = 18
• (2) 目的物 = 19
• (3) 設定契約과 性質 = 19
• A. 設定契約 = 19
• B. 性質 = 20
• (4) 公示方法 = 21
• (5) 被擔保債權 = 24
• 2. 假登記擔保의 對內的 效力 = 25
• (1) 假登記擔保의 效力이 미치는 範圍 = 25
• A. 目的物의 範圍 = 25
• B. 物上代位 = 29
• C. 被擔保債權의 範圍 = 30
• (2) 假登記擔保權의 實行 = 40
• A. 擔保實行의 要件 = 40
• B. 債權의 滿足方法과 效果 = 42
• (3) 假登記擔保權에 基한 本登記節次 = 43
• A. 假登記擔保權의 實行通知 = 43
• B. 淸算 = 50
• C. 假登記擔保權者와 後順位 擔保權者의 利害調整 = 72
• D. 淸算金의 供託 = 74
• E. 本登記 節次 = 75
• (4) 債權者등의 抹消請求權 (還受權) = 78
• A. 意義 = 78
• B. 還受權의 發生 = 78
• C. 還受를 要求할 수 있는 者 = 79
• D. 還受請求權의 法律的 性質 = 79
• E. 還受權의 要件 = 80
• F. 結論 = 82
• (5) 擔保目的物의 用益關係 = 82
• A. 假登記擔保權과 擔保目的物上의 用益權 = 82
• B. 假登記擔保權과 法定地上權 = 85
• C. 結論 = 87
• 3. 假登記擔保의 對外的劾力 = 88
• (1) 競賣節次에의 參加의 問題 = 88
• A. 問題의 所在 = 88
• B. 不動産競賣와 假登記擔保權 = 89
• (2) 競賣節次 開始後에 있어서의 假登記擔保權의 實行 = 97
• A. 問題點 = 97
• B. 第3者 異議의 訴 = 97
• C. 競賣節次를 排除하고 私的實行을 할 수 있는 경우 = 103
• (3) 破産에 있어서 假登記擔保權者의 地位 = 106
• A. 破産節次上의 取扱 = 106
• B. 破産節次에서의 處理 (別除權의 行使方法) = 108
• (4) 假登記擔保와 國稅優先權과의 關係 = 108
• A. 一般理論 = 108
• B. 우리나라 = 109
• 4. 假登記擔保의 消滅 = 109
• (1) 被擔保債權의 消滅 = 109
• A. 債務의 辨濟 = 109
• B. 所有權 移轉에 의한 消滅 = 113
• C. 時效에 의한 消滅 = 115
• (2) 目的物의 滅失·毁損 = 115
• Ⅴ. 提訴前和解와 關係 = 116
• 1. 假登記擔保와 關聯한 提訴前和解의 運營實態 = 116
• (1) 提訴前和解制度 利用實態 = 116
• (2) 提訴前和解事件中 假登記擔保事件의 比率 = 118
• (3) 提訴和解의 成立日字와 辨濟期 = 119
• (4) 提訴前和解節次와 辯護士 = 120
• 2. 提訴前和解로 이루어지는 假登記擔保의 問題點 = 121
• (1) 白紙委任狀에 관한 問題 = 121
• (2) 强行法規에 違反된 提訴前和解의 效力 = 126
• 3. 私見一提訴前和解의 濫用防止策 = 138
• Ⅵ. 結論 = 140
• 參考文獻 = 145