현행 헌법상 경자유전 원칙의 규범적 의미 재해석 = Reinterpretation of the Normative Meaning of the Farmland System in Constitution

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The principle of Farmland System in Article 121 of the current Constitution is the core provision of economic democratization in our Constitution. In modern times, it has begun with the establishment of self-employed farmers to break down the status system and dismantle the landlord system after liberation. On the other hand, the Constitutional Court of Korea maintains the basic principle that farmland owners are obliged to use farmland for agricultural management as well as farmland owners, and those who do not use it for agricultural management are denied the right to own farmland. The principle does not violate the principle of excessive prohibition or violate the essential contents of basic rights.
However, there is a debate on whether it is realistic to maintain the principle of Farmland System in Article 121 of the current Constitution in order to promote balanced national development and regional agriculture economy in the crisis situation of the rural society which is rapidly disintegrating with the increase of the elderly population. The purpose of this study is to review the changed reality of farmland ownership based on land property rights, to analyze constitutional suitability and related issues through the reinterpretation of the principle of Farmland System in the Constitution.
Therefore, considering the reality of the transition to a digital society with the technological revolution, the necessity of amending the Constitution of Article 121(1) of the current Constitution, which significantly reduces sustainability, realistic agricultural effectiveness, and social justification, in order to convert agricultural productivity centered on 'farmland and human labor' into 'technology'.
Based on the above discussions, it is meaningful to raise the problem of the fundamental principle of the farmland system represented and to review the new direction of the farmland management system. I hope that the revision of the provisions of Article 121 of the current Constitution, which focuses on the improvement of the agricultural structure, practical use of farmland, and beneficiary aspects, will be discussed through more discourses.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이재삼, "현행 농지법상 농지의 효율적 이용을 위한 개선방안 연구" 13 (13): 2020

2 "헌재 2020. 5. 27. 2018헌마362, 판례집 32-1하, 396"

3 "헌재 2013. 6. 27. 2011헌바278, 판례집 25-1, 475"

4 "헌재 2010. 2. 25. 2010헌바39등, 공보 161, 536"

5 "헌재 2003. 4. 24. 99헌바110등, 판례집 15-1, 371, 394-395"

6 "헌재 1989. 12. 22. 88헌가13, 판례집 1, 357, 372"

7 한도숙, "헌법정신, 제헌헌법에서 6공화국 헌법까지: 경자유전 어떻게 변해왔나(1)"

8 김용창, "헌법에서 토지와 국토이용 규정의 역사적 변화 및 사회적 기속성" 67 : 2021

9 고인석, "헌법상 경자유전의 원칙에 대한 논의와 대안" 21 (21): 2021

10 허강무, "헌법상 경자유전 원칙과 상속농지 관리의 법적 검토 - 대상판결: 대법원 2019. 2. 14 선고2017두65357 판결 -" 87 : 2019

11 이종수, "한국헌법상 ‘경자유전의 원칙’과 한계" 24 (24): 2008

12 채광석, "토지공개념에 기초한 농지관리 제도 개선 방안" 한국농촌경제연구원 2019

13 김영하, "제2의 농지개혁" 새로운 사람들 2019

14 국회헌법개정특별위원회, "자문위원회 보고서" 2018

15 서창원, "농지임대차 제도의 법정책적 개선방안 연구" 대진대학교 2019

16 왕승혜, "농지법제 개선 방안 연구" 한국법제연구원 2022

17 채광석, "농지법상 예외적 농지소유 및 이용 실태와 개선과제" 한국농촌경제연구원 (182) : 2019

18 이종구, "농지매매와 농지임대차에 관한 소고" 한국부동산경매학회 2 (2): 2021

19 사동천, "농업ㆍ농촌의 미래와 헌법적 과제 – 농업ㆍ농촌의 지속가능한 발전과 공익적 기능의 제고를 중심으로-" 21 (21): 2020

20 송재일, "국토의 균형발전, 경자유전원칙에 맞는 농지거래법제 개선 연구-LH 투기 사태 이후 농지법 개정을 중심으로-" 95 : 2021

21 안영춘, "경자유전, 알리바이가 된 헌법 제121조"

22 김현아, "경자유전 원칙의 불편한 진실"

23 김홍상, "경자유전 원칙에 관한 소고 : 헌법과 법률 내용을 중심으로" 29 (29): 2006

24 "https://www.parlamento.pt/sites/EN/Parliament/Documents/Constitution7th.pdf"

25 "https://www.anayasa.gov.tr/media/7258/anayasa_eng.pdf"

26 "https://world.moleg.go.kr/web/tl/themaLgslReadPage.do?A=A&code=700201&searchType=all&se archPageRowCnt=10&searchNtnlCls=4&searchNtnl=CH&pageIndex=1&CTS_SEQ=38858&A ST_SEQ=45"