RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      大邱大公園 建設에 대한 經濟的 妥當性 分析 = (A) Study on analysis of the economic validity of Taegu grand park construction

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T8430383

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This dissertation aims at the economic validity of the Taegu Grand Park which is scheduled to construct at the eastern region of Taegu Metropolitan City and the Taegu Sports Complex now on the construction for the preparation of World Soccer Game in 2002 and Universiad in 2003 through benefit assesment. The dissertation applied methodologically two different valuation methods for the public goods such as parks, environmental goods, and governmental investment to compare the results in the Contingency Valuation Method which gains the ground to assess the public goods in these days and the Net Present Value method in traditional method of the valuation.
      The chapter Ⅰ over-viewed the general meaning and purpose of benefit/cost analysis, and the existing researches in literature. The chapter Ⅱ examined the classification of parks and the function, historical background of the park, the listed statistics of the parks in Taegu City, the process of Sport Complex construction and the plan for the maintenance, and the blue print of the Taegu Grand Park.
      The chapter Ⅲ studied on the theoretical aspect of the methodology in the valuation methods as CVM and NPV for the public goods in literature and explained the process of the questionnaire design. The chapter Ⅳ analyzed of the socio-economic consciousness of Taegu citizens about the construction of the sport complex facilities and the Grand park plan and applied the methods of benefit/cost analysis to find out the economic validity.
      The analysis compared the differences of the result in two methods of valuation in CVM and NPV for more reasonable assesment and measurement of the values to the facilities in the policy. The differences of the amount in money values by the different methods implies the importance of the methodology to decide the investment priority of the public goods as the research result showed. The analysis showed a reasonable reliability in Cronbach Test and the distribution of sex, age, family income, and dwelling region was considerably dispersed. the average age was 34, average number of the family was 4.1, and average family income was 34,400,000won. Sex influenced the desire for the game watch and male was higher than female. But family income and age was no meaning and dwelling region did not influenced the desire for the game watch.
      The degree of recognition of the respondents about the geographical identification of the Taegu Grand Park and the Sport Complex was unexpectedly low. That is, 56% of the respondents answered lower recognition on the geographical identification of the Taegu Grand Park and the Sport Complex due to the lack of public advertisement and the difficult access to the environment of the facilities.
      First, the estimated benefits of the Taegu citizens for the construction of the facilities by CVM was 1,409,400,000won in Net Benefit. Even though the existing circumstances of the access is difficult compared to the case of Palgong Mountain Park or Apsan Park, the Taegu Grand Park could be estimated the enough values in economic validity of the investment if the place could serve for the similar level of relaxation, recreation, touristic values, and environmental functions as Apsan Park or Woobang Land which has more than two million visitors in a year.
      Second, the result of the estimated Net Benefit for the facilities by NPV was negative 2,558,300,000,000won showing no validity of the valuation method for the public goods as parks in NPV method.
      The limitations of the research are vary and yearly net benefit of the facilities is not susceptible because of difficult access to the site. The suggested figure in questionnaire is the images of blue print and it will be at most the scenery of 14 years later from now.
      It is not susceptible also in this situation of dwelling and road conditions to invest so much of totally 2,707,800,000,000won. Here the result suggest that Taegu Metropolitan City should find out helpful resolutions for the plan and most important issue will be the transportation to access and the epoch of policy to increase visitors to the facilities as the analysis told us.

      번역하기

      This dissertation aims at the economic validity of the Taegu Grand Park which is scheduled to construct at the eastern region of Taegu Metropolitan City and the Taegu Sports Complex now on the construction for the preparation of World Soccer Game in ...

      This dissertation aims at the economic validity of the Taegu Grand Park which is scheduled to construct at the eastern region of Taegu Metropolitan City and the Taegu Sports Complex now on the construction for the preparation of World Soccer Game in 2002 and Universiad in 2003 through benefit assesment. The dissertation applied methodologically two different valuation methods for the public goods such as parks, environmental goods, and governmental investment to compare the results in the Contingency Valuation Method which gains the ground to assess the public goods in these days and the Net Present Value method in traditional method of the valuation.
      The chapter Ⅰ over-viewed the general meaning and purpose of benefit/cost analysis, and the existing researches in literature. The chapter Ⅱ examined the classification of parks and the function, historical background of the park, the listed statistics of the parks in Taegu City, the process of Sport Complex construction and the plan for the maintenance, and the blue print of the Taegu Grand Park.
      The chapter Ⅲ studied on the theoretical aspect of the methodology in the valuation methods as CVM and NPV for the public goods in literature and explained the process of the questionnaire design. The chapter Ⅳ analyzed of the socio-economic consciousness of Taegu citizens about the construction of the sport complex facilities and the Grand park plan and applied the methods of benefit/cost analysis to find out the economic validity.
      The analysis compared the differences of the result in two methods of valuation in CVM and NPV for more reasonable assesment and measurement of the values to the facilities in the policy. The differences of the amount in money values by the different methods implies the importance of the methodology to decide the investment priority of the public goods as the research result showed. The analysis showed a reasonable reliability in Cronbach Test and the distribution of sex, age, family income, and dwelling region was considerably dispersed. the average age was 34, average number of the family was 4.1, and average family income was 34,400,000won. Sex influenced the desire for the game watch and male was higher than female. But family income and age was no meaning and dwelling region did not influenced the desire for the game watch.
      The degree of recognition of the respondents about the geographical identification of the Taegu Grand Park and the Sport Complex was unexpectedly low. That is, 56% of the respondents answered lower recognition on the geographical identification of the Taegu Grand Park and the Sport Complex due to the lack of public advertisement and the difficult access to the environment of the facilities.
      First, the estimated benefits of the Taegu citizens for the construction of the facilities by CVM was 1,409,400,000won in Net Benefit. Even though the existing circumstances of the access is difficult compared to the case of Palgong Mountain Park or Apsan Park, the Taegu Grand Park could be estimated the enough values in economic validity of the investment if the place could serve for the similar level of relaxation, recreation, touristic values, and environmental functions as Apsan Park or Woobang Land which has more than two million visitors in a year.
      Second, the result of the estimated Net Benefit for the facilities by NPV was negative 2,558,300,000,000won showing no validity of the valuation method for the public goods as parks in NPV method.
      The limitations of the research are vary and yearly net benefit of the facilities is not susceptible because of difficult access to the site. The suggested figure in questionnaire is the images of blue print and it will be at most the scenery of 14 years later from now.
      It is not susceptible also in this situation of dwelling and road conditions to invest so much of totally 2,707,800,000,000won. Here the result suggest that Taegu Metropolitan City should find out helpful resolutions for the plan and most important issue will be the transportation to access and the epoch of policy to increase visitors to the facilities as the analysis told us.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 머리말 = 1
      • 1. 연구의 목적 = 1
      • 2. 연구의 방법 = 3
      • 3. 선행연구 = 4
      • Ⅱ. 공원의 일반현황분석 = 8
      • Ⅰ. 머리말 = 1
      • 1. 연구의 목적 = 1
      • 2. 연구의 방법 = 3
      • 3. 선행연구 = 4
      • Ⅱ. 공원의 일반현황분석 = 8
      • 1. 공원의 종류 = 8
      • 2. 국립공원 = 10
      • 1) 국립공원의 지정목적 = 10
      • 2) IUCN의 세계 자연보호지역 분류 = 10
      • 3) 세계의 자연보호지역 및 국립공원 = 11
      • 4) 국립공원 관련 국제기구 = 11
      • 5) 우리나라의 국립공원 = 13
      • 3. 도시공원 = 14
      • 1) 도시공원의 필요성 = 14
      • 2) 도시공원의 종류 = 15
      • 3) 도시자연공원의 조건 = 16
      • 4) 도시자연공원의 기능과 시설 = 19
      • 4. 대구광역시 공원현황 = 23
      • 5. 대구대공원의 건설과 유지계획 = 26
      • 1) 건설계획 = 26
      • 2) 대구종합 경기장 건설과 유지계획 = 28
      • Ⅲ. 대구대공원 건설의 비용·편익에 대한 이론적 고찰 = 32
      • 1. 임의가치법(CVM)에 의한 편익측정이론 = 32
      • 1) 편익의 종류 = 33
      • 2) 편익평가의 문제점 = 37
      • 3) 사적재 시장모델과 정치적 시장모델 = 39
      • 4) 편익측정방법의 분류 = 42
      • 5) 임의가치법의 이론적 모형 = 47
      • 6) 설문지설계과정 = 51
      • 7) 표본추출과 시행 = 54
      • 2. 순현재가치법(NPV)에 의한 비용·편익분석 = 55
      • 1) 투자결정과 시간에 걸친 생산계획 = 55
      • 2) 투자수익의 현재가치(PV) = 56
      • Ⅳ. 대구대공원 건설계획의 경제적 타당성 실증분석 = 59
      • 1. 대구시민의 대공원건설에 대한 의식조사 = 59
      • 1) 설문지설계와 조사방법론 = 59
      • 2) 응답자의 일반사항 = 60
      • 2. 각 변수들간의 상관관계 회귀분석 = 76
      • 1) 신뢰도와 요인분석 = 76
      • 2) 선형회귀분석 결과 = 76
      • 3. 임의가치법(CVM)에 의한 대구대공원의 비용·편익 = 84
      • 1) 대구대공원내의 경기장의 편익 = 84
      • 2) 대구대공원의 5개 테마시설지구 편익 = 87
      • 3) 여행비용법에 의한 대구대공원의 편익계산 = 89
      • 4) 대구대공원 편익의 합계 = 90
      • 5) 총비용계산 = 91
      • 6) 순편익의 계산 = 92
      • 4. 순현재가치법(NPV)에 의한 대구대공원 건설의 비용·편익 = 93
      • 5. 분석결과해석과 제언 = 97
      • 1) 임의가치법에 의한 비용과 편익 = 97
      • 2) 순현재가치법에 의한 비용과 편익 = 100
      • 3) 분석결과와 제언 = 102
      • Ⅴ. 맺는말 = 105
      • 참고문헌 = 108
      • 영문초록 = 114
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼