대학생의 연상위계유형 간 창의적 사고와 창의적 성격 차이

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study is to examine the differences between creative thinking and creative personality of university students according to their associative hierarchy, and explore the possibility of using RAT(Remote Associate Test) as an alternative creativity test. To carry out this study, 174 university students at one university in Chungnam Province, took TTCT(Torrence Test of Creative Thinking), RAT, and a creative personality test. The 115 respondents who responded to the survey carefully were chosen as the final subjects. The results of this study are as follows. First, there was a significant difference in the whole creativity and subordinate factors of creative thinking, flexibility, and originality, of university students. The creative thinking of the flat associative hierarchy group was significantly higher than that of the steep group. Second, there was no significant difference in the creative personality of the university students except imagination between the types of associative hierarchies. This study suggests that university students in a group of flat hierarchy have higher creative thinking skills and there is still the need for further study to use RAT as an alternative creativity test.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 신진향, "한국어 원격연상단어검사(RAT)의 동형검사 신뢰도와 지시효과" 서울대학교 대학원 2014

2 한윤영, "통찰문제의 재구조화를 활용한 문제발견 검사로서의 K-RAT(Korean-Restructuring Test) 개발 및 타당화" 한국교육심리학회 26 (26): 1023-1051, 2012

3 김영채, "토란스 TTCT: 언어 A. B" 창의력 한국 FPSP 2004

4 표두미, "초·중·고등학교 학생들의 창의력과 성격 간 상관 연구: 창의력 올림피아드 참가 학생을 중심으로" 한국산학기술학회 16 (16): 7677-7689, 2015

5 이신동, "창의성의 이해" 박학사 2009

6 Weisberg, R. W., "창의성: 문제해결, 과학, 발명, 예술에서의 혁신" 시그마프레스 2009

7 김춘일, "창의성 추구를 위한 교육 : 교육과정과 관련한 하나의 기본 시각과 접근 방향" 18 (18): 63-88, 2000

8 배윤경, "창의성 및 지능과 학업 성취간의 상관" 梨花女子大學校 敎育大學院 1999

9 이신동, "지능과 창의성의 프레임" 양서원 2015

10 김기명, "지능과 창의성 수준에 따른 학업 성취 및 성격 특성 비교" 순천향대학교 교육대학원 2006

11 전경원, "종합창의성 모델의 5가지 창의성 영역" 5 : 23-29, 2001

12 송인섭, "자아개념의 다원성과 사회성취도의 관계" 5 (5): 3-17, 2001

13 이은혜, "원격 연상 검사의 구성 요소와 난이도 간의 관계" 서강대학교 일반대학원 2015

14 최형심, "어머니 및 교사가 인식한 유아의 창의적 성향과 유아의 창의적 사고와의 관계" 경희대학교 대학원 2005

15 최인수, "아동의 창의성과 성격 및 지능간의 관계: 창의성검사, Holland검사, Raven검사를 중심으로" 한국교육심리학회 19 (19): 135-158, 2005

16 한윤영, "문항반응이론을 적용한 한국형 재구조화연합검사(K-RAT)의 문항탐색" 한국영재교육학회 12 (12): 93-113, 2013

17 이신동, "대학생의 창의적 성격 비교" 한국교육방법학회 15 (15): 105-120, 2003

18 김기모, "대학생의 연상위계유형에 따른 창의적 사고와 창의적 성격비교" 순천향대학교 일반대학원 2017

19 이신동, "대학생용 창의적 성격검사의 개발 및 타당화 연구" 한국교육심리학회 16 (16): 43-61, 2002

20 Hamilton, M. A., "“JAMAICANIZING” the MEDNICK Remote Associates Test of Creativity" 55 (55): 321-322, 1982

21 Maduudx, W. W., "When in Rome, learn why the Romans do what they do : How multicultural learning experiences facilitate creativity" 36 : 731-741, 2010

22 Torrance, E. P., "Torrance tests of creative thinking: Directions manual and scoring guide (Verbal test booklet A, B)"

23 Lubart, T. I., "Thinking and problem solving" Cambridge University Press 1994

24 Guilford, J. P., "The structure of intellect" 53 : 267-293, 1956

25 Gupta, N., "The road not taken : Creative solutions require avoidance of high-frequency responses" 23 : 288-294, 2012

26 Mednick, S. A., "The associative basis of the creative process" 69 : 220-232, 1962

27 Mednick, S. A., "The Remote Associates Test" 2 (2): 213-214, 1968

28 Benedek, M., "Revising Mednick’s Model on creativity-related differences in associative hierarchies" 47 (47): 273-289, 2012

29 Amabile, T. M., "Perspective on the social psychology of creativity" 46 : 3-15, 2012

30 Smith, K. A., "Multiply-constrained semantic search in the remote associates test" 128 : 64-75, 2013

31 Runco, M. A., "Judgments of the creativity of artwork from students and professional artists" 128 (128): 23-31, 1994

32 Guilford, J. P., "Intelligence, creativity, and their educational implications" R. O. Knapp 1970

33 Amabile, T. M., "Growing up creative-nurturing a lifetime of creative" CEF Press 1989

34 Treffinger, D. J., "Fostering independence and creativity" 3 (3): 214-224, 1980

35 Sawyer, R. K., "Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation" Oxford University Press 2006

36 Mednick, S. A., "Examiner's manual, remote associates test : . College and adult forms 1 and 2" Houghton Mifflin 1967

37 Chermahini A. S., "Development and validity of a Dutch version of the Remote Associates Task: An item-response theory approach" 7 : 177-186, 2012

38 Pluker, J. A., "Creativity: from potential to realization" American Psychological Association 2004

39 Barron, F., "Creativity, intelligence and personality" 32 (32): 439-476, 1981

40 Torrance, E. P., "Creativity and learning" Houhton Mifflin 1967

41 Guilford, J. P., "Creativity" 5 (5): 444-454, 1950

42 Coney J., "Creative thinking from an information processing perspective : A new approach to Mednick's theory of associative hierarchies" 29 : 109-131, 1995

43 Karlins, M., "Conceptual complexity and remote-associative proficiency as creativity variables in a complex problem solving task" 6 : 264-278, 1967

44 Cunningham, J. B., "Categories of insight and their correlates : An exploration of relationships among classic-type insight problems, revers puzzles, remote associates and esoteric analogies" 43 : 1-22, 2009

45 Torrance, E. P., "Can we teach children to think creatively?" 6 (6): 114-143, 1972

46 Kaufman, J. C., "Beyond big and little : The four models of creativity" 13 (13): 1-12, 2009

47 Friedman, R. S., "Attentional priming effects on creativity" 15 : 277-286, 2003

48 Benedek, M., "Associative abilities underlying creativity" 6 : 273-281, 2012

49 Pluker, J. A., "Assessment of creativity"

50 Ochse, R., "A critical appraisal of the theoretical validity of the Mednick Remote Associations Test" 20 (20): 195-199, 1990