RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      학성 한철하의 복음주의 신학 사상에 대한 연대기적 분석과 "ACTS 신학공관" 제안의 의미 = Achronological analysis of Dr. Chul-ha Han's evangelical theological thought and the significance of the proposal of "ACTS synoptic theological studies"

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T17118632

      • 저자
      • 발행사항

        양평군 : 아신대학교, 2024

      • 학위논문사항

        학위논문(박사) -- 아신대학교 대학원 , 신학과 조직신학전공 , 2024

      • 발행연도

        2024

      • 작성언어

        한국어

      • KDC

        231 판사항(6)

      • DDC

        230 판사항(23)

      • 발행국(도시)

        경기도

      • 형태사항

        x, 616 p. ; 26 cm

      • 일반주기명

        지도교수: 한상화
        "학성 한철하 박사 생애 연대표" 수록
        참고문헌 수록

      • 소장기관
        • 국립중앙도서관 국립중앙도서관 우편복사 서비스
        • 아신대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Dr. Chul-Ha Han (1924-2018) is acknowledged as the father of
      Korean evangelical theology and a globally esteemed Calvin scholar. This
      dissertation presents an exploration of his faith journey, a chronological
      analysis of his theological works, and an examination of his distinctive
      theological methodology, "Synoptic Theological Studies." The aims of this
      study are threefold: first, to investigate the impact of the early Korean
      church's evangelical faith on his theological formation; second, to
      chronologically analyze his theological oeuvre to delineate the core
      characteristics of his evangelical theology; and third, to elucidate the
      content of his Synoptic Theological Studies, thereby establishing a
      foundation for a practical theological methodology.
      Dr. Han's spiritual journey is delineated into three critical phases.
      The first phase encompasses his acquisition of evangelical faith; the
      second phase involves his theological education in the United States,
      where he assimilated Calvin’s theology and formulated his evangelical
      theological framework; the third phase encompasses his incorporation of
      Wesleyan theology into his theological praxis.
      Dr. Han became a theologian through a distinctive journey of faith.
      While searching for the Truth, he became convinced that true truth
      resides in Christianity. He was not influenced by any particular Christian
      thinker or theologian. Instead, he became a theologian through “faith in
      the Gospel” brought to Korea by missionaries. In other words, it was
      through the teachings of the early Korean church that he embarked on
      his theological path.
      He grew up within the Northwestern Christianity in Korea, which
      followed the Old-Princeton Theology tradition. Churches there upheld
      conservative beliefs and evangelical traditions. In the annals of Korean
      theological history, Dr. Han occupies a pivotal position. His theology is
      intimately connected to the orthodoxy of Dr. Hyung-Nyong Park, which
      in turn inherited the theological legacies of Samuel A. Moffett and
      William D. Reynolds from Pyongyang Seminary. Dr. Han’s evangelical
      theology can be synthesized as an amalgamation of 16th-century Calvinist
      theology, 20th-century Old Princeton Theology, and Hyung-Nyong Park's
      orthodoxy, with an additional appropriation of Wesleyan theological
      insights.
      Dr. Han's theology was driven by an "ecclesiological awareness"
      because he had a positive view of revivalism and believed that all
      theology should be devoted to church ministry. He also viewed the
      earthly church as holding significant value as it aspires toward the ideal
      of the heavenly church. Hence, his theology was eschatological and
      otherworldly, focusing on salvation with the ultimate goal of the afterlife
      and the Kingdom of Heaven, while simultaneously addressing real-world
      issues by embodying biblical activism through the practice of evangelical
      faith.
      His quest for truth led him to Japan, where he affirmed the veracity
      of divine truth in Christianity, and subsequently to the United States,
      where he corroborated the historical authenticity of his faith and engaged
      in an extensive study of patristic theology, particularly Calvin’s Institutes
      of the Christian Religion at Westminster Theological Seminary. Upon his
      return to Korea, he served as a professor in Presbyterian seminaries for
      13 years, playing a central role in three major theological controversies:
      the indigenization debate, the 1967 Confession of Faith controversy, and
      the critique of the Family Federation for World Peace and Unification.
      Dr. Han’s theological endeavors reached their zenith with the
      founding of the Asian Center for Theological Studies and Mission
      (ACTS) in 1974, aligned with the global evangelical movement. ACTS
      evolved into a central hub for Korean evangelical theology and a
      pioneering missionary institution. Dr. Han also engaged in theological
      missions through lectures at Fuller Theological Seminary. He played a
      practical midwifery role in the establishment of the Korean Evangelical
      Theological Society, a theological community encompassing Presbyterian,
      Methodist, Holiness, and Pentecostal denominations. He also initiated the
      Korean Evangelical Fellowship, a coalition of evangelical churches,
      striving to balance theology and ministry.
      He consistently critiqued the issues inherent in Western theology and
      called for their rectification. Later, he termed this effort "Theology
      Mission". He identified the problem of Western theology not as one of
      logic, but as a methodological issue incapable of producing genuine faith.
      In other words, he sought to repudiate unbelief.
      His research on Calvin’s theology culminated in the formation of the
      Asian Congress on Calvin Research and the Korea Calvin Society,
      precipitating a Calvinist renaissance in Asia. His scholarly legacy includes
      the development of ”Synoptic Theological Studies“, an innovative
      methodological approach that addresses the limitations of Western
      theology by emphasizing a hermeneutic centered on soteriology. This
      approach, grounded in the essence of redemptive religion, is being
      propagated through the faculty of ACTS and aims to reorient
      contemporary theology towards practical applications that benefit the
      church.
      Dr. Han provided critical guidance for Christianity in a postmodern,
      secularized context, offering a methodological framework for conducting
      theology that centers on salvation and faith. His teachings call upon
      contemporary theologians to uphold the ultimate goal of faith (scopus
      fidei) and to develop a practical theology that serves the church
      effectively.
      번역하기

      Dr. Chul-Ha Han (1924-2018) is acknowledged as the father of Korean evangelical theology and a globally esteemed Calvin scholar. This dissertation presents an exploration of his faith journey, a chronological analysis of his theological works, and an ...

      Dr. Chul-Ha Han (1924-2018) is acknowledged as the father of
      Korean evangelical theology and a globally esteemed Calvin scholar. This
      dissertation presents an exploration of his faith journey, a chronological
      analysis of his theological works, and an examination of his distinctive
      theological methodology, "Synoptic Theological Studies." The aims of this
      study are threefold: first, to investigate the impact of the early Korean
      church's evangelical faith on his theological formation; second, to
      chronologically analyze his theological oeuvre to delineate the core
      characteristics of his evangelical theology; and third, to elucidate the
      content of his Synoptic Theological Studies, thereby establishing a
      foundation for a practical theological methodology.
      Dr. Han's spiritual journey is delineated into three critical phases.
      The first phase encompasses his acquisition of evangelical faith; the
      second phase involves his theological education in the United States,
      where he assimilated Calvin’s theology and formulated his evangelical
      theological framework; the third phase encompasses his incorporation of
      Wesleyan theology into his theological praxis.
      Dr. Han became a theologian through a distinctive journey of faith.
      While searching for the Truth, he became convinced that true truth
      resides in Christianity. He was not influenced by any particular Christian
      thinker or theologian. Instead, he became a theologian through “faith in
      the Gospel” brought to Korea by missionaries. In other words, it was
      through the teachings of the early Korean church that he embarked on
      his theological path.
      He grew up within the Northwestern Christianity in Korea, which
      followed the Old-Princeton Theology tradition. Churches there upheld
      conservative beliefs and evangelical traditions. In the annals of Korean
      theological history, Dr. Han occupies a pivotal position. His theology is
      intimately connected to the orthodoxy of Dr. Hyung-Nyong Park, which
      in turn inherited the theological legacies of Samuel A. Moffett and
      William D. Reynolds from Pyongyang Seminary. Dr. Han’s evangelical
      theology can be synthesized as an amalgamation of 16th-century Calvinist
      theology, 20th-century Old Princeton Theology, and Hyung-Nyong Park's
      orthodoxy, with an additional appropriation of Wesleyan theological
      insights.
      Dr. Han's theology was driven by an "ecclesiological awareness"
      because he had a positive view of revivalism and believed that all
      theology should be devoted to church ministry. He also viewed the
      earthly church as holding significant value as it aspires toward the ideal
      of the heavenly church. Hence, his theology was eschatological and
      otherworldly, focusing on salvation with the ultimate goal of the afterlife
      and the Kingdom of Heaven, while simultaneously addressing real-world
      issues by embodying biblical activism through the practice of evangelical
      faith.
      His quest for truth led him to Japan, where he affirmed the veracity
      of divine truth in Christianity, and subsequently to the United States,
      where he corroborated the historical authenticity of his faith and engaged
      in an extensive study of patristic theology, particularly Calvin’s Institutes
      of the Christian Religion at Westminster Theological Seminary. Upon his
      return to Korea, he served as a professor in Presbyterian seminaries for
      13 years, playing a central role in three major theological controversies:
      the indigenization debate, the 1967 Confession of Faith controversy, and
      the critique of the Family Federation for World Peace and Unification.
      Dr. Han’s theological endeavors reached their zenith with the
      founding of the Asian Center for Theological Studies and Mission
      (ACTS) in 1974, aligned with the global evangelical movement. ACTS
      evolved into a central hub for Korean evangelical theology and a
      pioneering missionary institution. Dr. Han also engaged in theological
      missions through lectures at Fuller Theological Seminary. He played a
      practical midwifery role in the establishment of the Korean Evangelical
      Theological Society, a theological community encompassing Presbyterian,
      Methodist, Holiness, and Pentecostal denominations. He also initiated the
      Korean Evangelical Fellowship, a coalition of evangelical churches,
      striving to balance theology and ministry.
      He consistently critiqued the issues inherent in Western theology and
      called for their rectification. Later, he termed this effort "Theology
      Mission". He identified the problem of Western theology not as one of
      logic, but as a methodological issue incapable of producing genuine faith.
      In other words, he sought to repudiate unbelief.
      His research on Calvin’s theology culminated in the formation of the
      Asian Congress on Calvin Research and the Korea Calvin Society,
      precipitating a Calvinist renaissance in Asia. His scholarly legacy includes
      the development of ”Synoptic Theological Studies“, an innovative
      methodological approach that addresses the limitations of Western
      theology by emphasizing a hermeneutic centered on soteriology. This
      approach, grounded in the essence of redemptive religion, is being
      propagated through the faculty of ACTS and aims to reorient
      contemporary theology towards practical applications that benefit the
      church.
      Dr. Han provided critical guidance for Christianity in a postmodern,
      secularized context, offering a methodological framework for conducting
      theology that centers on salvation and faith. His teachings call upon
      contemporary theologians to uphold the ultimate goal of faith (scopus
      fidei) and to develop a practical theology that serves the church
      effectively.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 들어가는 글 ······················································································· 1
      • A. 연구 주제와 목적 및 범위 ····································································· 1
      • 1. 주제와 목적과 유익 ·········································································· 3
      • 2. 자료 및 범위와 한계(Delimitation) ·················································· 6
      • B. 연구 방법론 및 논문 구조와 지도개념 ················································ 9
      • Ⅰ. 들어가는 글 ······················································································· 1
      • A. 연구 주제와 목적 및 범위 ····································································· 1
      • 1. 주제와 목적과 유익 ·········································································· 3
      • 2. 자료 및 범위와 한계(Delimitation) ·················································· 6
      • B. 연구 방법론 및 논문 구조와 지도개념 ················································ 9
      • 1. 연구 방법론(Methodology) ································································ 9
      • 2. 논문의 전체구조(Structure) ··························································· 11
      • 3. 지도개념(Keyword) ·········································································· 16
      • a. 기독교종교(Christisn Religion) ················································ 16
      • b. 복음신앙(Fides Evangelii, Faith in the Gospel) ················· 20
      • c. 신본주의(Theocentricism) ·························································· 23
      • d. 복음주의(Evangelicalism) ·························································· 24
      • e. 중심진리(Central Truth) ····························································· 28
      • f. 신학공관(Synoptic Theological Studies) ································ 30
      • g. 칼빈의 신학과 웨슬리적 실천 ··················································· 33
      • C. ACTS 신학과의 관계 ············································································ 35
      • Ⅱ. 학성의 신앙과 신학 배경으로서 한국교회 초기 신앙 ············· 38
      • A. 역사 해석 방법론 ················································································· 38
      • B. 한국교회 초기 복음신앙과 학성의 신앙 형성 ································· 44
      • 1. 한국교회 초기 복음신앙의 경향성 ················································· 46
      • a. 기독교의 본질(本質): 종교론 ··················································· 46
      • b. 복음의 기원(起源): 성경론 ························································· 50
      • c. 복음의 전당(殿堂): 교회론 ························································· 54
      • d. 복음의 역동적 역사(役事): 부흥(Revival) ······························ 59
      • e. 복음의 투쟁(鬪爭): 항일운동, 반공사상, 신사참배 저항 ······ 66
      • 2. 학성의 생(生)과 한국교회 복음신앙과의 만남 ···························· 71
      • Ⅲ. 학성의 복음주의신학 태동 (1924~1974) ··································· 78
      • A. 제1기: 한국교회와 복음신앙 경험(1924~1954) ····························· 79
      • 1. 유소년 시절(1924~1942): 한국교회 복음신앙 체득 ··················· 79
      • 2. 청년 시절(1942~1950): 일본 유학과 지성적 자각 ····················· 87
      • 3. 목회자 시절(1950~1954): 교회 개척과 문서 사역 ····················· 97
      • B. 미국 유학과 세계복음주의신학 체험(1955~1960) ························· 106
      • 1. 맥코믹신학교(1955. 9~1956. 6): Albright 학파와 성경신학 ·· 109
      • 2. 웨스트민스터신학교(1956. 9~1958. 6): 반틸의 변증학 ········ 115
      • 3. 버지니아 유니온신학교(1958. 9~1960. 6): 개신교 교부학 ···· 121
      • C. 학성의 신학교육과 현실 참여(1960~1974) ································· 128
      • 1. 장로교 교단 신학교의 신학자(1960~1974) ································ 128
      • a. 합동측 남산 총회신학대학교 교수(1960~1963) ·················· 129
      • b. 통합측 광나루 장로회신학대학교 교수(1964~1974) ·········· 134
      • c. 보세이 에큐메니칼연구소: 사회복음 연구(1966~1967) ····· 148
      • 2. 학성의 복음주의신학과 신학논쟁 그리고 가톨릭과의 대화 ····· 154
      • a. 제1차 논쟁: 토착화 논쟁(1964) ············································· 155
      • b. 제2차 논쟁: 신조 논쟁(1967)\ ················································ 173
      • c. 제3차 논쟁: 이단 논쟁(1970~1971) ······································ 188
      • d. 한국 가톨릭과의 대화(1963, 1968~1971) ··························· 197
      • 3. 학성의 현실 참여(1971~1973): 민주수호국민협의회 ··············· 203
      • Ⅳ. 학성의 복음주의신학의 발전과 확장 (1974~1997) ················ 233
      • A. 세계 복음주의 운동과 한국복음주의신학의 개척 ························· 233
      • 1. 아세아연합신학대학원(ACTS) 한국 유치와 설립(1974) ········· 233
      • 2. 미국 풀러신학교에서의 강연(1979,1985) ·································· 254
      • 3. 아시아신학연맹(ATA) 창립(1971)과 아시아신학대학원(AGST)
      • 설립 제안(1984) ············································································· 275
      • B. 국내에서의 복음주의신학 운동과 칼뱅 연구의 중흥 ····················· 283
      • 1. 한국복음주의신학회 설립(1971~1981) ········································ 283
      • 2. 한국복음주의협의회(KEF) 설립(1978~1981) ···························· 303
      • 3. 아시아칼빈학회(1987)와 한국칼빈학회(1988) 설립 ················· 305
      • a. 「신학지남」칼뱅 특집호(1962): 학성의 기고 작품 해설 · 305
      • b. 학성의 “칼빈신학에 있어서의 경건” 연구(1964) ················ 310
      • 4. 한국과 아시아의 칼뱅 르네상스: 학성의 칼뱅 작품 연구 ····· 315
      • a. “칼빈과 칼 바르트에 있어서의 기도론 비교”(1983) ·········· 320
      • b. “칼뱅 신학에 있어서의 목회 신학”(1989) ··························· 324
      • c. “칼뱅의 하나님의 영원한 선택교리와 목회 신학”(1995) ·· 334
      • d. 개회연설: “칼뱅의 종교에 있어 한국 칼뱅주의의 뿌리를
      • 찾아서”(1998) ········································································· 340
      • e. “칼뱅의 부활론과 목회 사역”(1999) ··································· 345
      • f. “칼뱅에 있어 신앙의 목표”(2002) ········································ 353
      • C. ACTS 신학공관 제안(1994) 및 ACTS 선교대학원 건립(1997) ·· 360
      • Ⅴ. 학성의 복음주의신학의 성숙(1998~2018) ································ 371
      • A. 복음중심의 에큐메니칼 신학: 칼뱅신학과 웨슬리 신학의 추구 ·· 372
      • 1. 학성의 ACTS 신학 건설의 비전 ················································· 372
      • 2. 학성의 복음주의신학: 칼뱅과 웨슬리의 본질적 일치 ·············· 376
      • 3. 학성의 “칼뱅과 웨슬리의 성화론” 이해 ····································· 391
      • B. 학성의 신학 여정의 결정판: 『21세기 인류의 살 길』··············· 402
      • C. 정교한 독서법의 완성판: 『기독교강요 해설과 토론』················ 450
      • Ⅵ. 신학공관 제안과 실천(1994~2018) ··········································· 466
      • A. 신학공관의 제안 ················································································· 466
      • 1. 신학공관의 정의와 필요성 ···························································· 466
      • 2. 학성의 제안과 실천의 역사 ························································ 473
      • B. 공동 연구로서의 신학공관과 ACTS 교수진의 실천 ··················· 505
      • 1. 공동 연구의 가치와 중요성 ························································· 506
      • 2. ACTS 교수진의 분과별 공동 연구 논문 개관 ·························· 511
      • 3. ACTS 신학포럼을 통한 공동 연구 실천 ··································· 519
      • C. 신학공관의 방법론(Methodology) ····················································· 522
      • 1. 중심진리와 신앙의 목표(Scopus Fidei) ···································· 523
      • 2. 해석학적 구조: 총괄(Summa)과 부분(Pars)의 관계 ············· 529
      • 3. 종교적 독서: 실재 자체(res ipsa) ············································ 534
      • 4. 신학자의 자세와 경건한 글쓰기(Pious Writing) ················· 537
      • D. 신학공관 평가(Evaluation)와 역사적 신학적 의의 ······················ 543
      • 1. 북미 복음주의 학자들의 평가: D. A. Carson(1999), Frank A.
      • James(2017) ················································································· 543
      • 2. 신학공관 평가의 함의 ·································································· 553
      • 3. 신학공관의 역사적 신학적 의의 ··············································· 554
      • Ⅶ. 나가는 글 ······················································································· 560
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼