RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      한국 국회의원의 관광정책 및 관광담당 행정부에 대한 인식 연구

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100117063

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Korean tourism has been in the center of interest by the legislators for a long time. However, results have not been very satisfying compare to the interests and efforts shown by the government and legislators. It is In order to realize and maximize the political effectiveness, it is important for us to study the views of administrative branch; where they plan and execute the policies and legislators; who makes crucial decisions to have positive perceptions on tourism branch as well as level of communication in between them. My studies will focus on the perception by the two branches and thereby we can understand their stand point. In addition, I have examined the perceptions of the legislators. By studying the perceptions of the two, the study will be able to analyze the reasons and directions in making the policies. As seen on the survey, we were able to see the consensus by the legislators that they were overwhelmingly in favour of Korean tourism policies. But, they have shown disappointments towards administrative bodies where it plans and execute policies. Legislators argue that the administrative branch is reluctant to set Korean tourism on their priority list and they are not very effective communicators when working with other branches. Through this survey, we were able to find out that legislators were very hospitable towards tourism industries and they have been supportive of further financial and political assistance by the administration and by the parliament.
      번역하기

      Korean tourism has been in the center of interest by the legislators for a long time. However, results have not been very satisfying compare to the interests and efforts shown by the government and legislators. It is In order to realize and maximize t...

      Korean tourism has been in the center of interest by the legislators for a long time. However, results have not been very satisfying compare to the interests and efforts shown by the government and legislators. It is In order to realize and maximize the political effectiveness, it is important for us to study the views of administrative branch; where they plan and execute the policies and legislators; who makes crucial decisions to have positive perceptions on tourism branch as well as level of communication in between them. My studies will focus on the perception by the two branches and thereby we can understand their stand point. In addition, I have examined the perceptions of the legislators. By studying the perceptions of the two, the study will be able to analyze the reasons and directions in making the policies. As seen on the survey, we were able to see the consensus by the legislators that they were overwhelmingly in favour of Korean tourism policies. But, they have shown disappointments towards administrative bodies where it plans and execute policies. Legislators argue that the administrative branch is reluctant to set Korean tourism on their priority list and they are not very effective communicators when working with other branches. Through this survey, we were able to find out that legislators were very hospitable towards tourism industries and they have been supportive of further financial and political assistance by the administration and by the parliament.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 조민호, "호텔산업의 환경과 전략에 관한 바람직한 이론적 모형적립" 259-275, 1996

      2 최윤희, "현대PR론" 나남출판사 1992

      3 신호창, "행정PR원론" 이화여대 출판부 2002

      4 지봉구, "지자체 공무원의 지역관광인식 수준별 관광영향지각 차이분석" 대한관광경영학회 22 (22): 307-324, 2007

      5 정정길, "정책학원론" 대명출판사 1997

      6 채경석, "정책학 원론" 대왕사 2005

      7 이남영, "입법부와 행정부간 선진협력 관계 구축 방안 연구 결과보고서" 정책기획위원회

      8 차배근, "매스커뮤니케이션 효과이론" 나담 2003

      9 조민호, "관광호텔업 지원제도 평가에 관한 연구" 한국호텔외식경영학회 17 (17): 19-40, 2008

      10 이연택, "관광정책학" 일신사 2003

      1 조민호, "호텔산업의 환경과 전략에 관한 바람직한 이론적 모형적립" 259-275, 1996

      2 최윤희, "현대PR론" 나남출판사 1992

      3 신호창, "행정PR원론" 이화여대 출판부 2002

      4 지봉구, "지자체 공무원의 지역관광인식 수준별 관광영향지각 차이분석" 대한관광경영학회 22 (22): 307-324, 2007

      5 정정길, "정책학원론" 대명출판사 1997

      6 채경석, "정책학 원론" 대왕사 2005

      7 이남영, "입법부와 행정부간 선진협력 관계 구축 방안 연구 결과보고서" 정책기획위원회

      8 차배근, "매스커뮤니케이션 효과이론" 나담 2003

      9 조민호, "관광호텔업 지원제도 평가에 관한 연구" 한국호텔외식경영학회 17 (17): 19-40, 2008

      10 이연택, "관광정책학" 일신사 2003

      11 정희자, "관광산업 인식제고방안에 관한 연구" 한양대학교 1998

      12 연합뉴스, "관광공사 사장의 ‘한탄’"

      13 최승묵, "관광개발에 대한 관광담당 공무원의 태도" 한국관광학회 29 (29): 209-227, 2005

      14 지봉구, "공무원의 관광인식 차이분석" 한국관광연구학회 21 (21): 227-240, 2007

      15 박양우, "「이명박 정부」와 「참여정부」의 관광정책 비교 고찰" 한국호텔외식경영학회 17 (17): 191-219, 2008

      16 Thomas L. Harris., "Value Added Public Relation" NTC Business Books 1998

      17 Nancy, G. M, "Understanding legislators and their perceptions of the tourism industry: The case of North Carolina, USA, 1990 and 2003" 27 : 684-694, 2006

      18 Dye, T. R, "Understanding Public Policy" Prentice Hall 1981

      19 Lasswell, H. D, "The Policy Orientation" Stanford University Press 1951

      20 Nancy, G. M., "The Polictics of Perception: Legislative Images of the Tourism Industry in Virginia and North Carolina" 44 (44): 684-694, 2006

      21 Grunig, J. E, "Public Relations Techniques" Harcourt Brace College Publishers 1993

      22 Jenkins, W. I., "Political Analysis: A Political and Original-zational Perspective" St. Martin's Press 1978

      23 Myers. D. G., "Exploring Psychology" Worth Publisher 2007

      24 Grunig,J.E., "Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management" Lawrence Erlbaum 1992

      25 Glen,B, "Effective Public Relations,8th edition" Prntice Hall 2000

      26 Ripley, R. B., "Bureaucracy and Policy Implementation" Dorsey 1986

      27 Easton,D.A, "A System Analysis of Political Life" University of chicago Press 1965

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-08 학회명변경 영문명 : (KHTA) -> Korean Hospitality and Tourism Academe KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-11-27 학회명변경 영문명 : Korean Hospitality and Tourism Academe(KOHTA) -> (KHTA) KCI등재
      2015-05-19 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국호텔외식경영학회 -> 한국호텔외식관광경영학회
      영문명 : Korean Academic Society Of Hospitality Administration(Kasha) -> Korean Hospitality and Tourism Academe(KOHTA)
      KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-09-27 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Korea Academic Society of Hotel Administration -> Korean Journal of Hospitality and Tourism(KJHT) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-08-13 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국호텔경영학회 -> 한국호텔외식경영학회
      영문명 : Korean Academic Society Of Hospitality Administration(Kasha) -> Korean Academic Society Of Hospitality Administration(Kasha)
      KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-05-26 학술지명변경 한글명 : Korean Journal of Hotel Administration -> Korean Journal of Hospitality Administration
      외국어명 : Korean Journal of Hotel Administration -> Korean Journal of Hospitality Administration
      KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 2.62 2.62 2.64
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      2.68 2.64 3.073 0.55
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼