RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      장애유아 통합교육에 관한 일반유아교사와 유아특수교사의 인식차이 = Recognition comparison of the handicapped pre-school Teachers and the unhandicapped pre-school Teachers about the Intergration education program for the handicapped pupil

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T9844585

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of this study is to enhance the intergration education of pre-school Teacher and teacher about the handicapped preschooler, So this study has its purpose in comparing reconition about an intergration education of the handicapped teacher and the unhandicapped teacher. also had its purpose in providing it as a basic material for a correct intergration education.
      The object of study was care teacher working in jeon-buk. was used a questionaire as a measuring implement of study. I distibuted 150 questionaire papers to the teachers and used SPSS win 10.0 program about 128 papers and analyzed statistically.
      The necessity of a intergaration education, the application for an intergration education, the curricuium for an intergration, the problem for an intergration education, the prepareration prereguiste task for an intergration education, in five spheres was compared teachers' recognition.
      The results obtained from this study are as follows;
      First, necessity of a intergaration education, handicapped teacher and the generally have higher than unhandicapped teachers. but the most part the teachers of two group recognized that an intergaration education of ac handicapped children was necessary. They also understood positively about the impact it affeected.
      Second, the application for an intergration education, handicapped teacher and the generally have higher than unhandicapped teachers.
      Third, curriculum for an intergration handicapped teacher and the generally have higher than unhandicapped teachers. but the most part the teachers of two group recognized that an intergaration education of ac handicapped children was education curiculrum
      Forth, the problem for an intergration handicapped teacher and the generally have higher than unhandicapped teachers. but the most part the teachers of two group recognized that an intergaration education of ac handicapped children was problem
      Finally, the prereguiste task for an intergration unhandicapped teacher and the generally have higher than handicapped teachers. but the most part the teachers of two group recognized that an intergaration education of ac handicapped children was preparation work
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study is to enhance the intergration education of pre-school Teacher and teacher about the handicapped preschooler, So this study has its purpose in comparing reconition about an intergration education of the handicapped teacher an...

      The purpose of this study is to enhance the intergration education of pre-school Teacher and teacher about the handicapped preschooler, So this study has its purpose in comparing reconition about an intergration education of the handicapped teacher and the unhandicapped teacher. also had its purpose in providing it as a basic material for a correct intergration education.
      The object of study was care teacher working in jeon-buk. was used a questionaire as a measuring implement of study. I distibuted 150 questionaire papers to the teachers and used SPSS win 10.0 program about 128 papers and analyzed statistically.
      The necessity of a intergaration education, the application for an intergration education, the curricuium for an intergration, the problem for an intergration education, the prepareration prereguiste task for an intergration education, in five spheres was compared teachers' recognition.
      The results obtained from this study are as follows;
      First, necessity of a intergaration education, handicapped teacher and the generally have higher than unhandicapped teachers. but the most part the teachers of two group recognized that an intergaration education of ac handicapped children was necessary. They also understood positively about the impact it affeected.
      Second, the application for an intergration education, handicapped teacher and the generally have higher than unhandicapped teachers.
      Third, curriculum for an intergration handicapped teacher and the generally have higher than unhandicapped teachers. but the most part the teachers of two group recognized that an intergaration education of ac handicapped children was education curiculrum
      Forth, the problem for an intergration handicapped teacher and the generally have higher than unhandicapped teachers. but the most part the teachers of two group recognized that an intergaration education of ac handicapped children was problem
      Finally, the prereguiste task for an intergration unhandicapped teacher and the generally have higher than handicapped teachers. but the most part the teachers of two group recognized that an intergaration education of ac handicapped children was preparation work

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 목차 = Ⅰ
      • Abstract = ⅰ
      • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
      • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 1
      • 2. 연구의 문제 = 2
      • 목차 = Ⅰ
      • Abstract = ⅰ
      • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
      • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 1
      • 2. 연구의 문제 = 2
      • 3. 연구의 제한점 = 3
      • 4. 용어의 정의 = 3
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 5
      • 1. 통합교육의 개념과 배경 = 5
      • 2. 통합교육의 효과 및 조건 = 7
      • 3. 통합교육에 대한 교사의 태도 = 8
      • 4. 성공적인 장애유아 통합교육의 선제조건 = 10
      • 5. 선행연구의 고찰 = 11
      • Ⅲ. 연구의 방법 = 13
      • 1. 연구대상 = 13
      • 2. 조사도구 = 13
      • 3. 자료의 처리 = 15
      • Ⅳ. 연구 결과 및 해석 = 16
      • 1. 특수교육의 필요성 = 16
      • 2. 통합교육의 운영 = 18
      • 3. 통합교육의 교육과정 = 20
      • 4. 통합교육의 문제점 = 22
      • 5. 통합교육의 선결과제 = 24
      • Ⅴ. 요약 및 결론 = 27
      • 1. 요약 = 27
      • 2. 결론 = 35
      • 3. 제언 = 38
      • ※ 참고문헌 = 39
      • 질문지 = 40
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼