RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    의약품 표시와 소비자능력

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82512038

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study examined how much of the information on the packaging of over the counter medicine
    consumers understood and used for rational decision making, and analyzed if there was any difference in
    the consumer’s competency to understand the information provided on the medication according to
    personal characteristics. The results are as follows;
    First, consumers gave correct answers to 3.82 questions on average out of 10 questions regarding the
    information on medication, which means consumers’ overall knowledge level is low.
    Second, to find out the consumer’ attitudes on the information on medication, the usefulness, reliability,
    and understanding of information were evaluated. The usefulness score was the highest at 3.87, followed
    by the importance score at 3.82, reliability score at 3.56, and the understanding score at 3.37. It means
    consumers’ understanding is lower than other areas of consumer attitudes.
    Third, to find out consumer behaviors regarding the information on medication, consumers’ information
    check and utilization behaviors were evaluated. The information check score was 3.31 and utilization
    score was 3.36, and the utilization score was slightly higher than the check score.
    Fourth, the correlations between consumer knowledge, attitude and behavior were examined. The
    correlation between consumer knowledge and attitude was .070, that between consumer knowledge and
    behavior was .127, and that between consumer attitude and behavior was .708. The correlation between
    consumer attitude and behavior was higher than other correlations.
    Lastly, the analysis of consumer’s competency according to personal and health variables showed that the
    average consumer knowledge score increased in proportion to years of education and age, The average
    consumer attitude score also increased in proportion to age, years of education, status of health, and
    interest in health. And the average consumer behavior score increased in proportion to age, status of
    health, and interest in health.
    번역하기

    This study examined how much of the information on the packaging of over the counter medicine consumers understood and used for rational decision making, and analyzed if there was any difference in the consumer’s competency to understand the informa...

    This study examined how much of the information on the packaging of over the counter medicine
    consumers understood and used for rational decision making, and analyzed if there was any difference in
    the consumer’s competency to understand the information provided on the medication according to
    personal characteristics. The results are as follows;
    First, consumers gave correct answers to 3.82 questions on average out of 10 questions regarding the
    information on medication, which means consumers’ overall knowledge level is low.
    Second, to find out the consumer’ attitudes on the information on medication, the usefulness, reliability,
    and understanding of information were evaluated. The usefulness score was the highest at 3.87, followed
    by the importance score at 3.82, reliability score at 3.56, and the understanding score at 3.37. It means
    consumers’ understanding is lower than other areas of consumer attitudes.
    Third, to find out consumer behaviors regarding the information on medication, consumers’ information
    check and utilization behaviors were evaluated. The information check score was 3.31 and utilization
    score was 3.36, and the utilization score was slightly higher than the check score.
    Fourth, the correlations between consumer knowledge, attitude and behavior were examined. The
    correlation between consumer knowledge and attitude was .070, that between consumer knowledge and
    behavior was .127, and that between consumer attitude and behavior was .708. The correlation between
    consumer attitude and behavior was higher than other correlations.
    Lastly, the analysis of consumer’s competency according to personal and health variables showed that the
    average consumer knowledge score increased in proportion to years of education and age, The average
    consumer attitude score also increased in proportion to age, years of education, status of health, and
    interest in health. And the average consumer behavior score increased in proportion to age, status of
    health, and interest in health.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김석철, "표시적정화에 관한 연구" 한국소비자보호원 1990

    2 천경희, "청소년의소비자사회화에관한연구" 서울대학교 1996

    3 박순덕, "청소년의 소비자 능력과관련변수: 구매기능, 사용기능, 처분기능을 중심으로" 동국대학교 1999

    4 신혜선, "청소년기자녀의소비자사회화유형과소비자 능력에관한연구" 숙명여자대학교 1994

    5 노정옥, "전북지역 학교급식소의 가공식품 구매 실태 및 학교 급식 영양사의 영양 표시에 대한 인식 연구" 한국식품영양학회 21 (21): 87-96, 2008

    6 조영채, "일부 대학생의 자가 판단에 의해 사용하는 일반의약품에 대한 지식, 인식태도 및 사용실태와 관련요인" 한국보건교육·건강증진학회 24 (24): 45-61, 2007

    7 식품의약품안정청, "의약품의표시지침"

    8 장순옥, "영양표시에대한주부소비자의인지,이용, 요구도조사연구" 33 (33): 763-773, 2000

    9 조수희, "여고생의 영양지식,식태도,식습관 및 식품영양표시에 대한 인식" 대한지역사회영양학회 12 (12): 519-533, 2007

    10 이경옥, "식품영양표시에 대한 소비자 의식조사-활용도, 인지도, 신뢰도, 만족도, 필요도를 중심으로-" 한국생활과학회 16 (16): 761-773, 2007

    1 김석철, "표시적정화에 관한 연구" 한국소비자보호원 1990

    2 천경희, "청소년의소비자사회화에관한연구" 서울대학교 1996

    3 박순덕, "청소년의 소비자 능력과관련변수: 구매기능, 사용기능, 처분기능을 중심으로" 동국대학교 1999

    4 신혜선, "청소년기자녀의소비자사회화유형과소비자 능력에관한연구" 숙명여자대학교 1994

    5 노정옥, "전북지역 학교급식소의 가공식품 구매 실태 및 학교 급식 영양사의 영양 표시에 대한 인식 연구" 한국식품영양학회 21 (21): 87-96, 2008

    6 조영채, "일부 대학생의 자가 판단에 의해 사용하는 일반의약품에 대한 지식, 인식태도 및 사용실태와 관련요인" 한국보건교육·건강증진학회 24 (24): 45-61, 2007

    7 식품의약품안정청, "의약품의표시지침"

    8 장순옥, "영양표시에대한주부소비자의인지,이용, 요구도조사연구" 33 (33): 763-773, 2000

    9 조수희, "여고생의 영양지식,식태도,식습관 및 식품영양표시에 대한 인식" 대한지역사회영양학회 12 (12): 519-533, 2007

    10 이경옥, "식품영양표시에 대한 소비자 의식조사-활용도, 인지도, 신뢰도, 만족도, 필요도를 중심으로-" 한국생활과학회 16 (16): 761-773, 2007

    11 김영숙, "식품 영양표시에 대한 소비자능력(지식·태도·기능)과 제도적 제고 방안" 한국소비문화학회 9 (9): 45-66, 2006

    12 김기옥, "소비자와시장경제" 시그마프레스. 2003

    13 김영신, "소비자와시장 환경" 시그마프레스 2003

    14 이기춘, "소비자교육의이론과실제, 2판" 교문사 2000

    15 정자용, "서울지역 일부 성인여성의 영양표시 이용실태와 이해도 및 이에 영향을 미치는 요인 연구" 대한지역사회영양학회 12 (12): 417-425, 2007

    16 이인숙, "대학생들의 식품영양표시 관련 식행동 조사" 한국식생활문화학회 17 (17): 299-308, 2002

    17 한국소비자원, "국내외일반의약품표시실태조사보고서" 2008

    18 Mansson, N. O, "The Relation between self-rated health, socioeconomic status, body mass index and disability pension among middleaged men" 17 : 65-69, 2001

    19 Arset, B. S, "The European consumer’s understanding and perception of the organic food regime" 106 (106): 93-105, 2004

    20 Marietta, A.B, "Knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of college students regarding the 1990 Nutrition Labelling Education Act food labels" 99 (99): 445-449, 1999

    21 Moschis, G. P, "Consumer Socialization: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis" 15 : 599-609, 1978

    22 Dickinson, V. H, "Consumer Education: A Development Approach" Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of American council on Consumer Interests. 1980

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.35 1.35 1.2
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.33 1.34 1.388 0.15
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼