Finding solutions for furthering regional cooperation in Northeast Asia : focusing on Korea, Japan, and China|RISS 상세보기

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

To analyze how regional cooperation strategies for Northeast Asia’s regionalism initiated by governments of three major countries ,Korea, Japan, and China, have been chronologically evolved within the context of regional dynamics and international paradigm shift, this thesis examined how, when, why Northeast Asia’s regional institutionalization has been advanced to some degree on the basis of the recent literatures on Northeast Asia’s regionalism - the Critical Juncture Framework model and Political Will model. The thesis conducted a comparative analysis, with three variables: Security-related Crisis (SRC), Financially induced Crisis (FIC), and Political Will (PW), to find out which factor has mainly affected the evolution of Northeast Asia’s regionalism. The thesis classified every regional cooperation strategies of three countries into three different categories: SRC, FIC, and PW based on the initial condition of each strategy whether it was a product of crisis or top leader’s political leadership, analyzes whether each regional cooperation strategy brought about any variations in regional institutional arrangement or not, and figures out which variable among three is the most effective one in explaining the evolution of Northeast Asia’s institutionalization at the regional level. Finally, the thesis, based on the comparative analysis, concluded that Political Will (PW) has been the most effective factor to gear up Northeast Asia’s regionalism.

번역하기

목차 (Table of Contents)

I. Introduction
1.1. Overview of Northeast Asia 1
1.1.1.Asian Paradox 1
1.1.2.Historical Reconciliation 2
1.2. Methodology 4

I. Introduction
1.1. Overview of Northeast Asia 1
1.1.1.Asian Paradox 1
1.1.2.Historical Reconciliation 2
1.2. Methodology 4
II. Evolving Regionalism in Northeast Asia
2.1. Underlying Conditions of Regional Cooperation 7
2.1.1. Percpetion of Three Countries 7
2.1.1.1. Korea 7
2.1.1.2. Japan 8
2.1.1.3. China 10
2.1.2. Theoratical Framework of Regionalism 11
2.1.2.1. Neo-Functional Framework 12
2.1.2.2. Critical-Juncture Framework 14
2.1.2.3. Political Will Framework 16
III. Historical Overview of Regional Cooperation Strategies
3.1. The Birth of Northeast Asia’s Regionalism 19
3.2. Korea’s Regional Cooperation Strategies 21
3.2.1. ‘East Asia Vision Group’ 21
3.2.2. ‘Northeast Asian Cooperation Initiative’24
3.2.3. ‘New Asia Initiative’ 26
3.2.4. ‘Northeast Asia Peace and Cooperation Initiative’ 28
3.2.5. Korea’s Charateristics of Regional Cooperation Strategies 31
3.3. Japan’s Regional Cooperation Strategies 34
3.3.1. ‘Obuchi Plan’ 34
3.3.2. ‘New Fukuda Doctrine’ 36
3.3.3. ‘East Asia Community’ 38
3.3.4. Japan’s Charateristics of Regional Cooperation Strategies 40
3.4. China’s Regional Cooperation Strategies 42
3.4.1. ‘Peaceful Rise and Harmonious World’ 43
3.4.2. ‘China Dream’ 45
3.4.3. China’s Charateristics of Regional Cooperation Strategies 47
Ⅳ. Comparative Analysis of Regional Cooperation Strategies
4.1.The Critical-Juncture Framework 50
4.1.1. Security-related Crisis (SRC) 50
4.1.2. Financially induced Crisis (FIC) 53
4.2. Political Will Framework 55
4.3.Assessment of Three Models: SRC, FIC, and PW 58
Ⅴ. Conclusion 60
Bibliography 62

상세검색

RISS 보유자료

상세검색

해외전자자료