RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    한·중 부동산 조세정책의 비교분석에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Comparison Analysis of Real Estate Tax Policy in Korea and China

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T13823363

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    China's economy has grown rapidly since its reform and opening-up. For this reason, there has been much interest in real estate, especially in China, followed by strong desire to possess it. In China, private ownership to the land was not recognized. However, since the reform and opening up, land use right, one of the features of land ownership, has come to be recognized. Therefore, interested in investing in real estate has been very strong in China, which has recently resulted in serious problems related to real estate speculation. Rampant real estate speculation would increase the frequency of irregular transactions among the speculators who seek after unearned incomes, which raises the values of real estate, contributing to a boost in prices. This would cause overall chaos in the order of the real estate transactions in China, leading to a loss of motivation among the ordinary people.

    In this regard, the Chinese government is making its efforts to improve its real estate tax policy to prevent speculation, but the improvement efforts are still incomplete state. Thus, this study seeks to derive ways of making China's real estate tax policy more efficient in an effort to hold in checks real estate speculations in China, by making comparison and analysis between the taxation policies in the two countries (i,e., China and Korea).

    First, regarding Korea's real estate tax system, this study examined the Acquisition tax, in which acquisition of a certain property such as real estate becomes an object of taxation; Property tax & Comprehensive Real Estate Holding Tax, in which ownership of real estate constitutes an object of taxation; and Transfer Income Tax, in which incomes incurred through an transfer of land, buildings, etc. are subject to taxation.

    As for China's taxation system, it reviewed Contract Tax (i.e.,契税), the Chinese version of Acquisition Tax, in which the real estate if its ownership is changed, becomes an object of taxation; Stamp Tax (i.e.,印花稅), which is collected from receiving parties as Property Tax after the change or the transfer of property right (over real estate) takes place; Land Value Added Tax (i.e.土地增值税), the Chinese version of Real Estate Transfer Tax, in which, if transferred, the right of using state-owned land as well as buildings or fixtures on land becomes subject to taxation; Corporate Income Tax which is collected on the incomes of the businesses that develop, manage, and administer real estate; Property Tax (i.e.,房產稅), the Chinese version of Possession Tax, which is collected from the owners of the buildings, when profits are incurred from the increased values of, or the lease of those buildings; and City & Town Land Tax (i.e.,城镇土地稅), which is collected on land in cities or towns (i.e.,镇,) purposed to encourage reasonable use of the land, and moderately adjust the gaps in the levels of incomes incurred from the land use in those areas.

    Also, it mentioned the challenges against China's future tax policies, by deriving common denominators and differences and then by making comparison and analysis between the two countries' systems of Acquisition tax, Transfer Tax, and Possession Tax. In order to overcome these challenges, the kinds of taxes related to real estate should be integrated, the demand and supply of real estate (should be) realigned, the scopes of taxation (should be) defined, and the income of real estate tax (should be) transferred to local government. In addition, in light of a great difference between the regions in China, by-grade jurisdiction of real estate taxation should be established based on real situation of each district.
    번역하기

    China's economy has grown rapidly since its reform and opening-up. For this reason, there has been much interest in real estate, especially in China, followed by strong desire to possess it. In China, private ownership to the land was not recognized. ...

    China's economy has grown rapidly since its reform and opening-up. For this reason, there has been much interest in real estate, especially in China, followed by strong desire to possess it. In China, private ownership to the land was not recognized. However, since the reform and opening up, land use right, one of the features of land ownership, has come to be recognized. Therefore, interested in investing in real estate has been very strong in China, which has recently resulted in serious problems related to real estate speculation. Rampant real estate speculation would increase the frequency of irregular transactions among the speculators who seek after unearned incomes, which raises the values of real estate, contributing to a boost in prices. This would cause overall chaos in the order of the real estate transactions in China, leading to a loss of motivation among the ordinary people.

    In this regard, the Chinese government is making its efforts to improve its real estate tax policy to prevent speculation, but the improvement efforts are still incomplete state. Thus, this study seeks to derive ways of making China's real estate tax policy more efficient in an effort to hold in checks real estate speculations in China, by making comparison and analysis between the taxation policies in the two countries (i,e., China and Korea).

    First, regarding Korea's real estate tax system, this study examined the Acquisition tax, in which acquisition of a certain property such as real estate becomes an object of taxation; Property tax & Comprehensive Real Estate Holding Tax, in which ownership of real estate constitutes an object of taxation; and Transfer Income Tax, in which incomes incurred through an transfer of land, buildings, etc. are subject to taxation.

    As for China's taxation system, it reviewed Contract Tax (i.e.,契税), the Chinese version of Acquisition Tax, in which the real estate if its ownership is changed, becomes an object of taxation; Stamp Tax (i.e.,印花稅), which is collected from receiving parties as Property Tax after the change or the transfer of property right (over real estate) takes place; Land Value Added Tax (i.e.土地增值税), the Chinese version of Real Estate Transfer Tax, in which, if transferred, the right of using state-owned land as well as buildings or fixtures on land becomes subject to taxation; Corporate Income Tax which is collected on the incomes of the businesses that develop, manage, and administer real estate; Property Tax (i.e.,房產稅), the Chinese version of Possession Tax, which is collected from the owners of the buildings, when profits are incurred from the increased values of, or the lease of those buildings; and City & Town Land Tax (i.e.,城镇土地稅), which is collected on land in cities or towns (i.e.,镇,) purposed to encourage reasonable use of the land, and moderately adjust the gaps in the levels of incomes incurred from the land use in those areas.

    Also, it mentioned the challenges against China's future tax policies, by deriving common denominators and differences and then by making comparison and analysis between the two countries' systems of Acquisition tax, Transfer Tax, and Possession Tax. In order to overcome these challenges, the kinds of taxes related to real estate should be integrated, the demand and supply of real estate (should be) realigned, the scopes of taxation (should be) defined, and the income of real estate tax (should be) transferred to local government. In addition, in light of a great difference between the regions in China, by-grade jurisdiction of real estate taxation should be established based on real situation of each district.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서 론 1
    • 1. 연구의 목적 1
    • 2. 연구의 방법 및 범위 2
    • Ⅱ. 부동산조세정책에 관한 이론적 고찰 4
    • Ⅰ. 서 론 1
    • 1. 연구의 목적 1
    • 2. 연구의 방법 및 범위 2
    • Ⅱ. 부동산조세정책에 관한 이론적 고찰 4
    • 1. 부동산조세의 개념·근거·분류 4
    • 1) 부동산조세의 개념 4
    • 2) 부동산조세의 근거 5
    • 3) 부동산조세의 분류 6
    • 2. 부동산에 관한 납세의무의 성립·소멸 6
    • 3. 부동산의 과세처분에 관한 불복 절차 7
    • Ⅲ. 한국 부동산조세제도의 체계 및 내용 9
    • 1. 부동산 취득세 9
    • 1) 정의 9
    • 2) 과세대상 및 납세의무자 10
    • (1) 과세대상 10
    • (2) 납세의무자 11
    • 3) 취득시기·과세표준·세율 13
    • (1) 취득시기 13
    • (2) 과세표준 13
    • (3) 세율 14
    • 4) 취득세 부과 및 납부 17
    • 5) 취득세 비과세 18
    • 6) 처벌 18
    • 2. 부동산 양도소득세 19
    • 1) 양도소득세의 의의 19
    • 2) 과세근거 20
    • 3) 과세대상 및 납세의무자 20
    • (1) 과세대상 20
    • (2) 납세의무자 23
    • 4) 취득시기·세율 23
    • (1) 양도 및 취득시기 23
    • (2) 세율 25
    • 5) 양도소득세제상 중과세 적용 27
    • (1) 미등기자산 27
    • (2) 1세대 3주택(조합원 입주권 포함) 이상에 해당하는 주택 28
    • (3) 양도소득세가 중과되는 1세대 2주택 28
    • 6) 납부 30
    • (1) 물납 30
    • (2) 분납 30
    • 7) 양도소득세의 비과세 31
    • 8) 벌칙 32
    • (1) 신고불성실가산세 32
    • (2) 납부불성실가산세 33
    • 3. 부동산 보유세 33
    • 1) 종합부동산세 33
    • (1) 종합부동산세의 의의 33
    • (2) 과세근거 34
    • (3) 종합부동산세의 과세대상 및 납세의무자 34
    • (4) 과세표준·세율 35
    • (5) 종합부동산세의 부과 및 징수 39
    • (6) 종합부동산세의 비과세 39
    • (7) 납부 40
    • (8) 처벌 41
    • 2) 재산세 42
    • (1) 재산세의 개념 42
    • (2) 과세근거 42
    • (3) 과세대상 및 납세의무자 43
    • (4) 과세표준·세율 46
    • (5) 재산세 부과 및 징수 48
    • (6) 재산세의 비과세 49
    • (7) 납부 50
    • (8) 벌칙 51
    • Ⅳ. 중국의 부동산조세제도 53
    • 1. 부동산 취득세 53
    • 1) 계세(契稅) 53
    • (1) 계세의 개념 53
    • (2) 계세의 근거 54
    • (3) 납세대상 및 납세의무자 55
    • (4) 세율 및 과세기준 57
    • (5) 비과세 58
    • 2) 인화세(印花稅) 59
    • (1) 인화세의 개념 59
    • (2) 과세근거 60
    • (3) 세율 60
    • (4) 비과세 63
    • (5) 납세 63
    • (6) 처벌 64
    • 2. 부동산 양도세 66
    • 1) 토지증치세(土地增值稅) 66
    • (1) 토지증치세의 개념 66
    • (2) 납세대상 및 납세의무자 67
    • (3) 세율 70
    • (4) 징수 71
    • (5) 비과세 72
    • 2) 성시유호건설세(城市有效建設稅) 74
    • 3. 부동산 보유세 75
    • 1) 방산세(房產稅) 75
    • (1) 방산세의 개념 75
    • (2) 방산세의 과세근거 75
    • (3) 납세대상 및 납세의무자 76
    • (4) 징수 77
    • (5) 비과세 78
    • (6) 납부 78
    • 2) 경지점용세(耕地佔用稅) 79
    • (1) 경지점용세의 개념 79
    • (2) 과세대상 및 납세의무자 79
    • (3) 세율 79
    • (4) 비과세 80
    • (5) 납부 81
    • 3) 성진토지사용세(城鎮土地使用稅) 82
    • (1) 성진토지사용세의 개념 82
    • (2) 성진토지사용세의 근거 82
    • (3) 납세대상 및 의무자 82
    • (4) 세율 83
    • (5) 비과세 84
    • (6) 납부 84
    • Ⅴ. 중국 부동산조세정책의 과제 및 방향 85
    • 1. 한·중 부동산조세제도의 비교 85
    • 1) 한·중 부동산 취득세의 공통점 및 차이점 85
    • 2) 한·중 부동산 양도세의 공통점 및 차이점 87
    • 3) 한·중 부동산 보유세의 공통점 및 차이점 88
    • 2. 중국의 부동산조세정책의 과제 및 방향 90
    • 1) 수입 모집을 위주로 확정 90
    • 2) 부동산조세종류 통합 및 부동산 수금정비 93
    • 3) 부동산세 과세범위 및 표준의 확장 94
    • 4) 투명한 세제규정 95
    • 5) 부동산세 수입의 지방정부 소유화 96
    • Ⅵ. 결 론 97
    • 참 고 문 헌 101
    • ABSTRACT 104
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼