중학생 자기애 성향의 하위유형에 따른 기질과 공감 능력의 차이 = Temperament and Empathy on the overt and covert narcissistic subjects in youth group

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In this study, narcissistic group of the junior high school students were divided into two subtypes of overt and covert. To investigate differences of two groups the Narcissistic Personality Disorder Scale(in PDDS-A), the Covert Narcissism Scale (CNS), The Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI), and The Temperament and Character Inventory (JTCI) were administered to 325 students of age 13-14. 35 students of those were overt narcissistic and 45 students of those were covert narcissistic. The control group was consisted of 37 students. Correlation analysis have been carried out using SPSS. As a result, the covert narcissistic students showed statistically higher Novelty seeking and Harm avoidance but lower Persistence compare to the overt narcissistic and control students. After looking for empathy between groups, we found that overt narcissistic student present better perspective-taking than covert. And overt and covert narcissistic students showed higher fantasy compare to controls. There was no difference between groups on empathic concern. On personal distress, covert narcissistic students showed higher score than the overts and the controls. These results suggested that covert narcissists have more malfunctioned aspects on the other hand the overt narcissists are rather adaptive in a real world.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구는 중학생을 대상으로 자기애적 성격의 하위 유형인 외현적 자기애 성향군과 내현적 자기애 성향군이 기질과 공감 능력에서 차이를 보이는지 알아보기 위하여 수행되었다. 이를 위해 중학교 2학년생 325명을 대상으로 성격장애진단검사-청소년용(PDDS-A)의 자기애적 성격장애 척도, 내현적 자기애 척도(CNS), 대인관계 반응양식 척도(IRI), 기질 및 성격검사(JTCI)의 기질척도를 실시하였다. 자기애적 성격장애 척도 점수와 내현적 자기애 척도 점수를 조합하여 내현적 자기애 성향집단 45명(남16, 여29), 외현적 자기애 성향집단 35명(남15, 여20), 자기애 성향이 낮은 비교집단 37명(남28, 여9)을 선발하여 비교하였다. 비교결과 자극추구와 위험회피에서 내현적 자기애 성향집단이 외현적 자기애 성향집단 및 비교집단보다 유의하게 높은 점수를 보였다. 반면에 인내력에서는 내현적 자기애 성향집단이 비교집단 및 외현적 자기애 성향집단보다 유의하게 낮은 점수를 보였다. 자기애 성향이 높은 집단과 낮은 집단 간에 공감능력(관점취하기, 상상하기, 공감적 관심, 개인적 고통)에 차이가 있는지 검증한 결과 관점 취하기에서는 외현적 자기애 성향집단이 내현적 자기애 성향집단보다 유의미하게 높은 것으로 나타났고, 상상하기에서는 내현적 자기애 성향집단과 외현적 자기애 성향집단이 비교집단보다 유의하게 높은 것으로 나타났다. 공감적 관심에서는 집단 간 유의미한 차이가 나타나지 않았으며, 개인적 고통에서는 내현적 자기애 성향집단이 외현적 자기애 성향집단과 비교집단보다 유의미하게 높은 점수를 얻었다. 이러한 결과는 내현적 자기애 성향집단이 외현적 자기애 성향집단에 비하여 실제 적응에서 보이는 공감 특성이 더 역기능적임을 시사한다. 끝으로 본 연구의 의의와 후속 연구 방향에 대해 논의하였다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 서재삼, "한국형 성격장애 진단검사의 개발과 타당화" 한국임상심리학회 25 (25): 273-288, 2006

2 김성은, "학생의 감정공명과 학업성적, 학급내 사회성, 학교에 대한 태도와의 관계에 관한 연구" 중앙대학교 대학원 1997

3 손애리, "청소년기 성격 병리의 평가: 성격장애 진단검사의 사용가능성"

4 황순택, "전형성 평정에 의한 성격장애 진단준거 개발" 연세대학교 1995

5 유성진, "심리평가 및 심리치료에 있어서 기질-성격 모형의 임상적 시사점" 한국임상심리학회 28 (28): 563-586, 2009

6 강선희, "내현적 자기애 척도의 개발 및 타당화 연구" 한국상담심리학회 14 (14): 705-723, 2002

7 오현숙, "기질 및 성격검사-청소년용 매뉴얼" (주)마음사랑 2004

8 민병배, "기질 및 성격 검사 매뉴얼" (주)마음사랑 2007

9 박성희, "공감학" 학지사 2004

10 Wink, P., "Two faces of narcissism" 61 (61): 590-597, 1991

11 Kohut, H., "The restoration of the self" International Universities press 1977

12 Rogers, C. R., "The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality charge" 2 : 95-103, 1957

13 Rose, P., "The happy and unhappy faces of narcissism" 33 : 371-391, 2002

14 Kohut, H., "The analysis of the self" International Universities Press 1971

15 Cloninger, C. R., "The Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI): a guide to its development and use" Washington University 1994

16 Rhodewalt, F., "The Social mind of the narcissist: Cognitive and motivational aspects of interpersonal self-construction. in : The social mind: Cognitive and Motivational aspects of interpersonal behavior" Cambridge University Press 177-198, 2001

17 Svrakic, D. M., "Temperament, Character, and personality disorders: Etiologic, Diagnostic, treatment issues" 106 : 2002

18 Battaglia, M., "Temperament dimensions explain the comorbidity of Psychiatric disorders" 37 : 292-298, 1996

19 Wills, T. A., "Temperament and novelty seeking in adolescent substance use: Convergence of dimensions of temperament with constructs from Cloninger’s theory" 74 : 387-406, 1998

20 Rhodewalt, F., "Social motivation and object relations: Narcissism and interpersonal self-esteem regulation. in : Social Motivation: Conscious and incounscious processes" Cambridge University Press 332-350, 2005

21 Watson, P., "Self-reported narcissism and shame: testing the defensive self-esteem and continuum hypothesis" 21 : 253-259, 1996

22 Rhodewalt, F., "Reflections in troubled waters: Narcissism and the vicissitudes of a interpersonally contextualized self. in : On building, defending and regulating the self: A psychological perspective" Philadelphia Psychology Press 125-149, 2005

23 Cloninger, C. R., "Psychobiological model of temperament and character" 50 : 975-990, 1993

24 Aktar, S., "Overview: Narcissistic personality Disorder" 139 (139): 12-20, 1982

25 Hickman, S., "Optimism, pessimism, and the complexity of narcissism" 20 : 521-525, 1996

26 Rhodewalt, F., "On self-aggrandizement and anger: A temporal analysis of narcissism and affective reasons to success and failure" 74 : 672-685, 1998

27 Wink, P., "New narcissism scales for the California Psychological Inventory and MMPI" 54 : 446-462, 1990

28 Raskin, R., "Narcissistic self-esteem management" 60 : 911-918, 1991

29 Watson, P. J., "Narcissistic personality inventory factors, Splitting and self-consciousness" 61 : 41-57, 1993

30 Ronningstam, E, "Narcissistic personality disorder. in : American psychiatric press review of psychiatry, 11" American Psychoatric Press 80-97, 2002

31 Emmons, R. A., "Narcissism: Theory and measurement" 52 : 11-17, 1987

32 Zuckerman, M., "Narcissism and well-being: A longitudinal perspective" 39 : 957-972, 2009

33 Morf, C. C., "Narcissism and self-evaluation maintenance: Exploration in object relations" 19 : 668-676, 1993

34 Davis, M. H., "Measuring individual differences in empathy; Evidence for multidimensional approach" 44 : 113-126, 1983

35 Watson, P., "Measures of the narcissistic personality: Complexity of relationships with self-esteem and empathy" 6 : 433-448, 1992

36 Cloninger, C. R., "Measurement of temperament and character in mood disorders: a model of fundamental states as personality types" 51 : 21-32, 1998

37 Rhodewalt, F., "Interpersonal self-regulation: Lessons from the study of narcissism. in : Handbook of self and identity" Guilford 519-535, 2002

38 Cloninger, C. R., "Feeling good: The sience of well-being" Oxford university Press 2004

39 Emmons, R. A., "Factor analysis and construct validity of the Narcissistic personality inventory" 48 : 291-300, 1984

40 Morf, C. C., "Expanding the dynamic self-regulatory processing model of narcissism" 12 : 243-251, 2001

41 Davis, M. H., "Empathy: A social psychological approach" Brown & Benchmark 1994

42 Hoffman, M. L., "Empathy, its development and prosocial implication. in : Nebraska Symposium on Motivation" University of Nebraska 1977

43 Bohart, A., "Empathy revisited: New directions in psychotherapy" American Psychological Association 1997

44 Svrakic, D. M., "Differential diagnosis of personality disorders by the seven-factor of model of temperament and character" 991-999, 1993

45 American Psychiatric Association, "Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder(4th Ed.)" Author 1994

46 American Psychiatric Association, "Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder(3rd Ed.)" Author 1980

47 Beck, A. T., "Cognitive theory of personality disorders" Guilford Press 2004

48 Kernberg, O., "Borderline conditions and pathological narcissism" Aronson 1976

49 Hendin, H. M., "Assessing hypersensitive narcissism: A reexamination of Murray’s narcism scale" 31 : 588-599, 1997

50 Sedikides, C., "Are normal narcissists psychologically healthy? Self-esteem matters" 87 : 400-416, 2004

51 Rathvon, N., "An MMPI-2 portrait of narcissism" 66 (66): 1-19, 1996

52 Cloninger, C. R., "A systematic method for clinical description and classification of personality variants" 44 : 573-588, 1987

53 Davis, M. H., "A multidimensional approach to individual difference in empathy" 10 : 85-, 1980