친육아주택 인증제도 고찰 및 도입 방안 연구 = A Study on Japanese Child-Rearing-Friendly Housing Certification Systems and Introduction in Korea

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper pays attention to the qualification standard on Child-Rearing-Friendly Housing(CRFH) as part of a countermeasure for the low birth rate, which Japan’s local government and private sector operates for the objective of enhancing the housing and child-rearing environment. In order to analyze the feasibility of implementation and demand characteristics in Korea, the characteristics and items for qualification standard of this system was surveyed among 178 women living in an apartment in Songpa-gu, Seoul. Major findings are as follows: Firstly, qualification standards on CRFH have been implemented and operated as a part of promoting local settlement and housing service for the child-rearing generation with slight variance according to local governments in Japan. However, Japan’s qualification standard is not supported by any legal basis, but executed and promoted by and guidelines of the local government instead. Secondly, as a result of the survey, 73.6% of the respondents was not aware of the qualification system of CRFH, but 75.3% agreed on the need to introduce it. There is a need to review the feasibility of implementation in Korea accordingly. Also, ‘Happy house’ (for newlyweds) actively promoted by the Korean government tends to emphasize the quantitative supply of housing. Thus, there is a need for immediate review the qualification items of CRFH and planning to reflect it in supply and construction. Thirdly, the biggest motivation for agreement on a qualification system on CRFH was this; ‘it is possible to focus more on work life’. On the contrary, people opposed for the reason; ‘it may induce the increase in price for housing’. In order to induce participation of business operators in the qualification system of CRFH without any increase of construction costs transferring to the moving in families, providing incentives such as the relaxation of floor area ratio must be sought as a solution for coexistence. Finally, as a result of a comparison analysis on the importanceevaluation among qualification items, there was a significant statistic difference in the average between singles and the married. The married evaluated items such as “storage space, prevention of noise complaint issues from downstairs, and convenience of medical facilities” as important, whereas singles evaluated ‘distance from city center’ as important.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• I. 서 론
• II. 이론적 고찰
• III. 일본 친육아주택 인증제도 비교
• Ⅳ. 설문조사 : 국내 친육아주택인증제도에 대한 인식 및 수요
• V. 결론
• 참고문헌

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 조성호, "한국과 일본의 저출산 현황과대응 정책"

2 신배정, "주거환경이 초등학생의 성장발달에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 5 (5): 387-125, 2007

3 정경숙, "주거커뮤니티내 아동친화적 근린환경 디자인지침 개발" 대한건축학회 25 (25): 93-101, 2009

4 천현숙, "일본의 출산지원 주택정책 및 육아지원서비스 운용사례 심층 조사" 국토연구원 2012

5 윤윤정, "일본의 저출산 대응 주택정책과 지역육아지원거점 사업" 375 : 118-128, 2013

6 김진범, "일본의 저출산 대응 정책 : 생활환경을 중심으로" 352 : 51-62, 2011

7 최희원, "일본 육아지원 공동주택 인증사례의 계획요소 특성에 관한 연구- 일본 요코하마(橫浜)시의 사례를 중심으로 -" 한국주거학회 25 (25): 11-18, 2014

8 최희원, "일본 육아지원 공동주택 인증기준의 평가항목 및 계획요소에 관한 기초연구" 25 (25): 267-272, 2013

9 정명희, "어린이집 평가인증 지표와 사후유지관리에 대한 영아반 보육교사와 원장의 인식 : 보육환경영역을 중심으로" 호남대학교 2014

10 임미숙, "어린이 발달을 지원하는 공동주택 개발 연구" 대한주택공사 2004

11 김예슬, "국민임대주택단지의 어린이 보육시설 환경 개선을 위한 건축계획 연구" 한양대학교 대학원 2014

12 袖井孝子, "日本の住まい変わる家族" ミネルヴ 2002

13 (社)近畿圏不動産流通機構, "居住ニーズの変化と新たな住宅形態" 29 : 2008

14 所道彦, "少子化対策の展開と子育て支援の住まい・まちづくり" (56) : 2007

15 村上あかね, "子育て期の家族・家計・住宅" (56) : 2007

16 横森圭, "子育て支援マンションの整備動向に関する考察: 自治体と民間の認定制度比較" 2011

17 松橋直人, "子育て支援マンションの建築計画に関する研究:: 自治体等の子育て支援マンション認定基準と実績の比較" 2008

18 掛水彩, "子育て支援マンションにおける子育て世帯への支援の在り方に関する研究" 2012

19 定行まり子, "子育ち支援と住まい・まちづくり" 2006

20 三村浩史, "住まい学のすすめ" 彰国社 1989