RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    대안학교 중 특성화 중학교의 가정교과 운영실태 및 인식에 관한 연구 = Recognition and Operation of Home Economics Education in Specialized Middle Schools among Alternative Schools

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104332203

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study examined the organization and operation of home economics curriculum of specialized middle school in the form of regular school among alternative schools and analyzed the perceptions of teachers and students about home economics class.
    Interviews were conducted with teachers of 6 specialized schools in order to determine the operations and teachers' perceptions of home economics education. Students' perceptions for home economics class were gathered through surveys with students from the 3 (of the original 6) schools that authorized the questionnaire survey. The final analysis utilized 205 student responses. Survey data were analyzed using the SPSS program.
    The results of the research were as follows:
    First, home economics education within specialized middle schools was mostly conducted according to the form of the technology-home economics curriculum, which is the national common basic curriculum. Compared to the 7th national curriculum, the class of technology-home economics curriculum in 4 schools occurred 1 hour less each week. Each school incorporated various specialized curricula related to home economics.
    Second, as for the operation of home economics education in specialized schools, most home economics classes were conducted by teachers who had majored (or minored) in home economics. Moreover, all but 1 school, which used self-made materials, used the national textbook and dealt with the entire content of the textbook. For teaching-learning methods and instructional media, various means were utilized. For evaluation methods, most schools based grades on paper-and-pencil tests(50-60%) and performance tests(40-50%).
    Third, among teachers' perceptions of home economics education, the meaning of home economics education was focused on practical help and the pursuit of home happiness; the purpose was to realize the happiness of students and their homes by applying these to actual living, and increase students' ability to see the world. In regards to difficulties in educational operations, most pointed out poor conditions of practice rooms. As for differences from general schools, most teachers mentioned the active communication with students.
    Fourth, through the home economics class, it was found that students perceived the goal of technology-home economics curricula as lower than average. Among students' perceptions about home economics class, most were negative. Perceptions about goal of technology-home economics curricula and home economics class also showed meaningful differences according to each school. Students of the school, which had more home economics class hours and specialized curricula related to home economics, perceived more positively. Also, students who were more satisfied with school and learned from a teacher who majored in home economics tended to perceive home economics class more positively.
    번역하기

    This study examined the organization and operation of home economics curriculum of specialized middle school in the form of regular school among alternative schools and analyzed the perceptions of teachers and students about home economics class. Inte...

    This study examined the organization and operation of home economics curriculum of specialized middle school in the form of regular school among alternative schools and analyzed the perceptions of teachers and students about home economics class.
    Interviews were conducted with teachers of 6 specialized schools in order to determine the operations and teachers' perceptions of home economics education. Students' perceptions for home economics class were gathered through surveys with students from the 3 (of the original 6) schools that authorized the questionnaire survey. The final analysis utilized 205 student responses. Survey data were analyzed using the SPSS program.
    The results of the research were as follows:
    First, home economics education within specialized middle schools was mostly conducted according to the form of the technology-home economics curriculum, which is the national common basic curriculum. Compared to the 7th national curriculum, the class of technology-home economics curriculum in 4 schools occurred 1 hour less each week. Each school incorporated various specialized curricula related to home economics.
    Second, as for the operation of home economics education in specialized schools, most home economics classes were conducted by teachers who had majored (or minored) in home economics. Moreover, all but 1 school, which used self-made materials, used the national textbook and dealt with the entire content of the textbook. For teaching-learning methods and instructional media, various means were utilized. For evaluation methods, most schools based grades on paper-and-pencil tests(50-60%) and performance tests(40-50%).
    Third, among teachers' perceptions of home economics education, the meaning of home economics education was focused on practical help and the pursuit of home happiness; the purpose was to realize the happiness of students and their homes by applying these to actual living, and increase students' ability to see the world. In regards to difficulties in educational operations, most pointed out poor conditions of practice rooms. As for differences from general schools, most teachers mentioned the active communication with students.
    Fourth, through the home economics class, it was found that students perceived the goal of technology-home economics curricula as lower than average. Among students' perceptions about home economics class, most were negative. Perceptions about goal of technology-home economics curricula and home economics class also showed meaningful differences according to each school. Students of the school, which had more home economics class hours and specialized curricula related to home economics, perceived more positively. Also, students who were more satisfied with school and learned from a teacher who majored in home economics tended to perceive home economics class more positively.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 최지혜, "제7차 기술?가정 교과에 대한 학생의 인식" 53 (53): 555-580, 2005

    2 김영찬, "제7차 교육과정에서의 기술?가정 교과에 대한 중학생의 태도 연구" 홍익대학교 2003

    3 김희동, "작은 학교가 아름답다" 보리 1994

    4 조용태, "우리나라 대안학교의 이념과 역사" 21 (21): 151-170, 2000

    5 이미리, "서울시 도시형 대안학교의 체육수업 현황과 학생들의 요구" 44 (44): 305-317, 2005

    6 김지현, "대안학교의 수학교육에 관한 연구" 홍익대학교 2004

    7 고형일, "대안학교와 일반학교의 교육활동 비교 연구" 8 (8): 127-162, 1998

    8 박근이, "대안학교에서 미술과 교육 현황" 이화여자대학교 2004

    9 강대중, "대안학교는 학교가 아니다" 박영률 2002

    10 강성희, "대안학교 영어교육현황 분석" 총신대학교 2005

    1 최지혜, "제7차 기술?가정 교과에 대한 학생의 인식" 53 (53): 555-580, 2005

    2 김영찬, "제7차 교육과정에서의 기술?가정 교과에 대한 중학생의 태도 연구" 홍익대학교 2003

    3 김희동, "작은 학교가 아름답다" 보리 1994

    4 조용태, "우리나라 대안학교의 이념과 역사" 21 (21): 151-170, 2000

    5 이미리, "서울시 도시형 대안학교의 체육수업 현황과 학생들의 요구" 44 (44): 305-317, 2005

    6 김지현, "대안학교의 수학교육에 관한 연구" 홍익대학교 2004

    7 고형일, "대안학교와 일반학교의 교육활동 비교 연구" 8 (8): 127-162, 1998

    8 박근이, "대안학교에서 미술과 교육 현황" 이화여자대학교 2004

    9 강대중, "대안학교는 학교가 아니다" 박영률 2002

    10 강성희, "대안학교 영어교육현황 분석" 총신대학교 2005

    11 손영덕, "대안학교 교육만족도 연구" 연세대학교 교육대학원 2003

    12 이춘화, "대안학교 교육만족도 분석" 18 : 133-162, 2004

    13 정유성, "대안교육이란 무엇인가" 내일을 여는 책 1997

    14 서울평화교육센터, "대안교육의 모델과 실천" 내일을 여는 책 1996

    15 교육인적자원부, "대안교육백서" 교육인적자원부 2007

    16 이종태, "대안교육과 대안학교" 민들레 2002

    17 임수경, "남자 중학생의 가정교과 인식 및 가정교과 영역별 요구도" 이화여자대학교 2003

    18 이연숙, "기술?가정 교과 운영에 대한 교사의 인식과 요구" 14 (14): 1-14, 2002

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-09-03 학술지명변경 외국어명 : (Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association) -> Journal of Home Economics Education Research KCI등재
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2000-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.43 1.43 1.38
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.49 1.37 1.63 0.1
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼