RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    지구단위계획과 공공기여의 산정 = District-Unit Plan and Calculation of Public Contribution

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108091103

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In order for the owner to build a building on the relevant land, he/she must comply with the urban plan already established and determined by the administrative agency. However, there are cases where large-scale idle land is developed in combination for urban development or the area needs to be newly developed due to the relocation of urban planning facilities. In this case, the implementer of development project can proceed with the development project accordingly only when the administrative agency first changes to an urban plan that includes matters necessary for development. And this change in urban plan generates enormous development profits for implementers of development project. Therefore, through pre-negotiation and district-unit plans, the administrative agency changes it to an appropriate urban plan for development projects such as floor space index incentive, and in return, imposes the payment of land or money for public facilities on the implementer of development project. In this way, the obligation imposed by the administrative agency to the implementer of development project to recover the development profits from the change in urban plan is called “public contribution”.
    Since public contribution is a structure in which implementers of development project provide public facilities to relax the floor space index, it is often recognized and used similarly to “floor space index incentive according to the provision of new public facilities” among legal system for public facilities under the Development Project Law. Public contribution can be seen as a flexible transformation of the legal principles based on the legal system for public facilities under the Development Project Law. If so, public contribution needs to be interpreted and operated according to the characteristics distinguished from the legal system for public facilities under the Development Project Law. In particular, the key part that needs to establish standards for interpretation according to the conceptual purpose of public contribution is the calculation of public contribution.
    Public contribution has limitations in public law that cannot exceed the increase in land value due to changes in urban plan. In addition, the calculation of public contribution shall be in line with the public interest and shall not violate the principle of proportionality. Specific methods of the calculation of public contribution can be determined according to the principle and characteristic of public contribution. First, in order to reflect the actual increase in land value, the calculation of public contribution is evaluated by classifying the current value and future value of the target land. Such property appraisal is conducted at the time of pre-negotiation and included in the district-unit plan through the public contribution plan. In addition, since the amount of public contribution is a part of the development profits that the implementer of development project must bear, it is calculated based on the future value reflecting the development profits. Specific legislation is needed in the future for the criteria for the calculation of public contribution and means for securing the performance of public contributions to implementers of development project.
    번역하기

    In order for the owner to build a building on the relevant land, he/she must comply with the urban plan already established and determined by the administrative agency. However, there are cases where large-scale idle land is developed in combination f...

    In order for the owner to build a building on the relevant land, he/she must comply with the urban plan already established and determined by the administrative agency. However, there are cases where large-scale idle land is developed in combination for urban development or the area needs to be newly developed due to the relocation of urban planning facilities. In this case, the implementer of development project can proceed with the development project accordingly only when the administrative agency first changes to an urban plan that includes matters necessary for development. And this change in urban plan generates enormous development profits for implementers of development project. Therefore, through pre-negotiation and district-unit plans, the administrative agency changes it to an appropriate urban plan for development projects such as floor space index incentive, and in return, imposes the payment of land or money for public facilities on the implementer of development project. In this way, the obligation imposed by the administrative agency to the implementer of development project to recover the development profits from the change in urban plan is called “public contribution”.
    Since public contribution is a structure in which implementers of development project provide public facilities to relax the floor space index, it is often recognized and used similarly to “floor space index incentive according to the provision of new public facilities” among legal system for public facilities under the Development Project Law. Public contribution can be seen as a flexible transformation of the legal principles based on the legal system for public facilities under the Development Project Law. If so, public contribution needs to be interpreted and operated according to the characteristics distinguished from the legal system for public facilities under the Development Project Law. In particular, the key part that needs to establish standards for interpretation according to the conceptual purpose of public contribution is the calculation of public contribution.
    Public contribution has limitations in public law that cannot exceed the increase in land value due to changes in urban plan. In addition, the calculation of public contribution shall be in line with the public interest and shall not violate the principle of proportionality. Specific methods of the calculation of public contribution can be determined according to the principle and characteristic of public contribution. First, in order to reflect the actual increase in land value, the calculation of public contribution is evaluated by classifying the current value and future value of the target land. Such property appraisal is conducted at the time of pre-negotiation and included in the district-unit plan through the public contribution plan. In addition, since the amount of public contribution is a part of the development profits that the implementer of development project must bear, it is calculated based on the future value reflecting the development profits. Specific legislation is needed in the future for the criteria for the calculation of public contribution and means for securing the performance of public contributions to implementers of development project.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 홍정선, "행정법원론(상)" 박영사 2021

    2 김동희, "행정법Ⅰ" 박영사 2021

    3 서울특별시, "지구단위계획 수립기준・관리운영기준 및 매뉴얼"

    4 지준만 ; 김형주, "이전적지의 유형별 활용 사례 및 활용촉진방안 연구: 공공기여 및 용도변경을 중심으로" 한국도시행정학회 28 (28): 145-169, 2015

    5 김지엽 ; 남진 ; 홍미영, "서울시 사전협상제를 중심으로 한 공공기여의 의미와 법적 한계" 한국도시설계학회 17 (17): 119-129, 2016

    6 최나영 ; 설성혜 ; 김용학 ; 이상면, "사전협상에 따른 공공기여 기준 개선방안 연구 - 현대자동차부지특별계획구역 사전협상을 사례로 -" 한국부동산원 3 (3): 93-118, 2017

    7 정해영, "법치행정의 원리와 공공기여금" 법학연구소 10 (10): 198-220, 2017

    8 주명수 ; 이성창 ; 이제원, "도시계획변경 사전협상제도 운영상 특징과 개선방안 - 서울시 적용사례를 중심으로" 한국도시설계학회 18 (18): 23-38, 2017

    9 김상일, "도시계획 사전협상제도 : 성공적인 정착을 위한 과제" (39) : 2009

    10 송재선 ; 김철홍 ; 장재영, "기부채납에 의해 설치되는 공공시설 계획의 최적입지 유도방안" 한국도시설계학회 11 (11): 137-150, 2010

    1 홍정선, "행정법원론(상)" 박영사 2021

    2 김동희, "행정법Ⅰ" 박영사 2021

    3 서울특별시, "지구단위계획 수립기준・관리운영기준 및 매뉴얼"

    4 지준만 ; 김형주, "이전적지의 유형별 활용 사례 및 활용촉진방안 연구: 공공기여 및 용도변경을 중심으로" 한국도시행정학회 28 (28): 145-169, 2015

    5 김지엽 ; 남진 ; 홍미영, "서울시 사전협상제를 중심으로 한 공공기여의 의미와 법적 한계" 한국도시설계학회 17 (17): 119-129, 2016

    6 최나영 ; 설성혜 ; 김용학 ; 이상면, "사전협상에 따른 공공기여 기준 개선방안 연구 - 현대자동차부지특별계획구역 사전협상을 사례로 -" 한국부동산원 3 (3): 93-118, 2017

    7 정해영, "법치행정의 원리와 공공기여금" 법학연구소 10 (10): 198-220, 2017

    8 주명수 ; 이성창 ; 이제원, "도시계획변경 사전협상제도 운영상 특징과 개선방안 - 서울시 적용사례를 중심으로" 한국도시설계학회 18 (18): 23-38, 2017

    9 김상일, "도시계획 사전협상제도 : 성공적인 정착을 위한 과제" (39) : 2009

    10 송재선 ; 김철홍 ; 장재영, "기부채납에 의해 설치되는 공공시설 계획의 최적입지 유도방안" 한국도시설계학회 11 (11): 137-150, 2010

    11 허지인, "공공시설의 무상양도와 용적률 완화" 행정법이론실무학회 (65) : 121-147, 2021

    12 조희정 ; 강준모, "공공기여의 질적 제고를 위한 기부채납 효용성에 관한 연구- 서울시 도시계획구역을 중심으로" 한국도시설계학회 15 (15): 175-188, 2014

    13 김종보, "건설법의 이해" 피데스 2018

    14 유기현 ; 변창흠, "개발이익환수 수단으로서 공공기여의 효과에 관한 연구 - 특별계획구역을 중심으로 -" 대한건축학회 27 (27): 91-98, 2011

    15 허지인, "개발사업법상 공공시설에 관한 공법적 연구" 서울대학교 2020

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-11-20 학회명변경 한글명 : 행정법이론실무학회(行政法理論實務學會) -> 행정법이론실무학회
    영문명 : Korea Administrative Law And Practice Association(약칭 Kalpa) -> Korea Administrative Law And Practice Association(약칭 KALPA)
    KCI등재
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-05-30 학술지명변경 한글명 : 행정법연구(行政法硏究) -> 행정법연구 KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.61 1.61 1.39
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.31 1.37 1.384 0.57
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼