We studied workers in companies with an environment management system (EMS: ISO 14000) and those working in companies without such a system in order to understand the recognition differentiations between the two groups by measuring recognition of envi...
We studied workers in companies with an environment management system (EMS: ISO 14000) and those working in companies without such a system in order to understand the recognition differentiations between the two groups by measuring recognition of environmental contamination, knowledge, communication methods, environment policy and education method within the companies. Based on the results,we verify the related factors affecting recognition of environment contamination. We obtained responses from 395 workers who work for companies with an EMS and 351 workers who work for companies without an EMS using a structured questionnaire.The level of environment pollution was recognized at an average 4.27, which is not so severe but 'more than medium-level.' And they stated that they are satisfied with the environmental status of Korea a little and their health status is very good.It is shown that both groups obtain information on the environment from mainly from television, followed by the Internet, newspapers, radio and company education and speeches, in that order. On the question whether incidents that happen during tasks may be harmful, they responded that they rather think it is harmful a little.The both groups responded that they are not aware of their companies'' environmental policy or that they have no interest in it, which means they generally don''t know the policy. In addition, they recognized that their employers do not care for environmental management. In terms of environmental educational methods within the companies, they responded that there have rarely been environment education and pollution prevention activities within their companies. Also, they don''t actively participate in educational programs, if provided, and believe that education for the environment is only a little helpful. On the question whether they think education for the environment and methods should be changed, they replied that they don''t have any interest in it or don''t know about it.In terms of main environmental pollution, on the question whether environmental pollution is harmful to people''s health, in general they recognized that it is harmful to people''s health. On the other hand, they also thought that the damage can be directly or indirectly reduced by technology or the ability of people. The recognition of the environmental pollution is higher in the workers who work for companies without an EMS than in the workers who work for companies with an EMS. The more the media sources where they can obtain information, the higher the education they got the more communication with outside interests when environment pollution occurs, the stronger the inclination they have in participating ineducation for the environment and in improving the educational methods and the more seriously they recognize environmental pollution. The employer''s interest in environmental pollution was shown as the main factor significantly affecting the workers'' recognition levels. Mutual consentand encouragement on the nature-friendly environmental management should be made by conducting follow-up studies on the recognition and behavior pattern of the owners of the companies, environmental management agencies, and workers. And the results should be consulted in forming a national environmental policy and in environmental legislation. At this time, government, industry and education should be combined in order to establish a propelling body that will support long-term and detailed objectives from planning to implementation.