RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    Implications of the coordinated Governance to combating child labor through education : a comparative analysis of Brazil and Cambodia

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T13574240

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The pervasiveness of child labor in a country cannot be explained by a single factor. It is rather an outcome of a set of intertwined factors that are likely to discourage national development as a whole. Therefore, improving performance of a single sector would not be able to root out child labor in the country. Thus, totality approach, by which means multiple sectors of government go through development concurrently, is what is necessary to create a strong and sustainable momentum to drive child labor out of the country.
    Since eliminating child labor through education takes on country-specific context, countries with different cultural, economic, political and social settings have been dealing with the issue in different ways. Cambodia, for instance, has relied heavily on external assistance such as receiving aid from international donors, implementing programs on eliminating child labor that are designed by particular international organizations, and reforming education system in accordance with the suggestions proposed by the international development agencies. Unlikely, Brazil has decided to coordinate the government’s ownership and autonomy on its effort to combat child labor by strengthening the interactions between different levels of the government. While the Brazilian case of reducing child labor through education is widely acknowledged by the international society as a great success, the Cambodian case is often addressed as an example of failure. This study examines the outcomes of the efforts to eliminate child labor through education in the two countries and observes the implications of the degree and form of government’s coordination of ownership to combating child labor.
    번역하기

    The pervasiveness of child labor in a country cannot be explained by a single factor. It is rather an outcome of a set of intertwined factors that are likely to discourage national development as a whole. Therefore, improving performance of a single s...

    The pervasiveness of child labor in a country cannot be explained by a single factor. It is rather an outcome of a set of intertwined factors that are likely to discourage national development as a whole. Therefore, improving performance of a single sector would not be able to root out child labor in the country. Thus, totality approach, by which means multiple sectors of government go through development concurrently, is what is necessary to create a strong and sustainable momentum to drive child labor out of the country.
    Since eliminating child labor through education takes on country-specific context, countries with different cultural, economic, political and social settings have been dealing with the issue in different ways. Cambodia, for instance, has relied heavily on external assistance such as receiving aid from international donors, implementing programs on eliminating child labor that are designed by particular international organizations, and reforming education system in accordance with the suggestions proposed by the international development agencies. Unlikely, Brazil has decided to coordinate the government’s ownership and autonomy on its effort to combat child labor by strengthening the interactions between different levels of the government. While the Brazilian case of reducing child labor through education is widely acknowledged by the international society as a great success, the Cambodian case is often addressed as an example of failure. This study examines the outcomes of the efforts to eliminate child labor through education in the two countries and observes the implications of the degree and form of government’s coordination of ownership to combating child labor.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Table of Contents
    • Abstract i
    • Table of Contents iii
    • Table of Contents
    • Abstract i
    • Table of Contents iii
    • List of Figures vi
    • List of Acronyms vii
    • I. Introduction 1
    • 1. Purpose of the Study 1
    • 2. Research Question 2
    • 3. Definition of Terms 3
    • 3.1. Child 3
    • 3.2. Child Labor 4
    • 4. Research Methodology 7
    • II. Background Research 9
    • 1. Literature Review 9
    • 1.1. Relationship between Child Labor and Economic Circumstance 9
    • 1.2. Relationship between Child Labor and Schooling 11
    • 2. Case Selection 14
    • 3. Conditional Cash Transfer (CCT) Program 16
    • III. Theoretical Framework 19
    • IV. Cambodia 21
    • 1. The Cambodian Response to Child Labor 21
    • 1.1. The Education Strategic Plan (ESP) and Education Sector Support Program (ESSP) 21
    • 1.2. Priority Action Program (PAP) 25
    • 2. Comprehending Child Labor Trends in Cambodia 28
    • 3. Education Trends in Cambodia 32
    • V. Brazil 45
    • 1. National Response to Child Labor – Efforts to Eliminate Child Labor through Education 45
    • 1.1. Bolsa Escola (Education Grant) 45
    • 1.2. National Program for the Elimination of Child Labor (PETI) 48
    • 2. Comprehending Child Labor Trends in Brazil 49
    • 3. Education in Brazil 52
    • VI. Analysis of Findings 54
    • 1. Analysis of Brazil’s Success Factors 54
    • 2. Analysis of Cambodia’s Failure Factors 58
    • 3. Comparative Analysis of Brazil and Cambodia 62
    • VII. Conclusion 66
    • Bibliography 68
    • VIII. Abstract in Korean 72
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼