RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    올림픽 국가대표선수와 일반선수의 자기관리 비교 분석 = A Comparative analysis of the Korea Olympic representative athletes`s and common athletes`s Self-management

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A75482707

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this research is to compare self-management profiles of the members in Korean Olympic team with those of common athletes. The 261 participants (male: 134, female: 127)as the members of Korean Olympic team were sampled from the athletes, who were under training as the entrants for Athens 2004 Olympic Games, among 17 different events. 252 athletes among 15 different events, who have never been national representatives, participated for the common athletes. They were the members of the teams from several high schools, universities, and companies. In this research, three questions about the attitude of the athletes, and the test about self-management of athletes (ASMQ), developed by Heo, Jung-hoon(2003), were used. In addition, we analyzed the result statistically according to the athletes` play level and sex, and carried out t-tests. The results showed that 63% of participants in the group of members in Korean Olympic team consider winning a medal as the most important thing. On the other hand, the participants in the group of common athletes attached more importance to renewing their records, and self-satisfaction. For the question about the most important things for athletes, all of the participants answered that confidence and concentration are more significant than any other things. This means that they know the significance of psychological self-management. In the case of male athletes, the participants in the group of members in Korean Olympic team attached more importance to management of their bodies (p<0.01), personal relations (p<0.05), practice (p<0.05), and their mental strength (p<0.01) than the participants in the group of common athletes did. However, in the case of female athletes, the participants in the group of members in Korean Olympic team just attached more importance to the management of practice (p<0.05) than common athletes did. Furthermore, the male athletes in the group of members in Korean Olympic team showed high level of self-management on their mental strength. Both group of members of Korean Olympic team and group of common athletes showed low level of self-management on their body management, while they concentrated on the management of their personal relations. Both groups showed the same trends of self-management profiles.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this research is to compare self-management profiles of the members in Korean Olympic team with those of common athletes. The 261 participants (male: 134, female: 127)as the members of Korean Olympic team were sampled from the athletes,...

    The purpose of this research is to compare self-management profiles of the members in Korean Olympic team with those of common athletes. The 261 participants (male: 134, female: 127)as the members of Korean Olympic team were sampled from the athletes, who were under training as the entrants for Athens 2004 Olympic Games, among 17 different events. 252 athletes among 15 different events, who have never been national representatives, participated for the common athletes. They were the members of the teams from several high schools, universities, and companies. In this research, three questions about the attitude of the athletes, and the test about self-management of athletes (ASMQ), developed by Heo, Jung-hoon(2003), were used. In addition, we analyzed the result statistically according to the athletes` play level and sex, and carried out t-tests. The results showed that 63% of participants in the group of members in Korean Olympic team consider winning a medal as the most important thing. On the other hand, the participants in the group of common athletes attached more importance to renewing their records, and self-satisfaction. For the question about the most important things for athletes, all of the participants answered that confidence and concentration are more significant than any other things. This means that they know the significance of psychological self-management. In the case of male athletes, the participants in the group of members in Korean Olympic team attached more importance to management of their bodies (p<0.01), personal relations (p<0.05), practice (p<0.05), and their mental strength (p<0.01) than the participants in the group of common athletes did. However, in the case of female athletes, the participants in the group of members in Korean Olympic team just attached more importance to the management of practice (p<0.05) than common athletes did. Furthermore, the male athletes in the group of members in Korean Olympic team showed high level of self-management on their mental strength. Both group of members of Korean Olympic team and group of common athletes showed low level of self-management on their body management, while they concentrated on the management of their personal relations. Both groups showed the same trends of self-management profiles.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김판곤, "프로와 아마 축구선수의 심리기술과 자기관리 특성 분석" 창원대학교 대학원 2007

    2 박광진, "프로 경륜선수들의 자기관리 행동 분석" 창원대학교 대학원 2005

    3 권성호, "육상선수의 자기관리가 자신감에 미치는 영향" 한국스포츠심리학회 18 (18): 1-14, 2007

    4 김병준, "운동선수 자기관리행동의 측정" 국민체육진흥공단 체육과학연구원 14 (14): 125-140, 2003

    5 허정훈, "운동선수 자기관리 측정도구의 구조적 타당화와 인과모형 검증" 중앙대학교 대학원 2002

    6 윤혜선, "운동선수 자기관리 중재프로그램 적용의 효과" 한국스포츠심리학회 17 (17): 53-70, 2006

    7 허정훈, "운동선수 자기관리 검사지(ASMQ) 개발" 한국스포츠심리학회 14 (14): 95-109, 2003

    8 김종욱, "스포츠지도자의 리더십과 선수의 자기관리 및 경기력의 관계" 한국체육학회 46 (46): 335-343, 2007

    9 허정훈, "대학운동 선수들의 자기관리 전략: 평소연습과 시합상황의 비교" 40 (40): 187-198, 2001

    10 조현익, "대학 운동선수의 자기관리가 운동몰입 및 운동만족도에 미치는 영향" 한국체육학회 46 (46): 205-218, 2007

    1 김판곤, "프로와 아마 축구선수의 심리기술과 자기관리 특성 분석" 창원대학교 대학원 2007

    2 박광진, "프로 경륜선수들의 자기관리 행동 분석" 창원대학교 대학원 2005

    3 권성호, "육상선수의 자기관리가 자신감에 미치는 영향" 한국스포츠심리학회 18 (18): 1-14, 2007

    4 김병준, "운동선수 자기관리행동의 측정" 국민체육진흥공단 체육과학연구원 14 (14): 125-140, 2003

    5 허정훈, "운동선수 자기관리 측정도구의 구조적 타당화와 인과모형 검증" 중앙대학교 대학원 2002

    6 윤혜선, "운동선수 자기관리 중재프로그램 적용의 효과" 한국스포츠심리학회 17 (17): 53-70, 2006

    7 허정훈, "운동선수 자기관리 검사지(ASMQ) 개발" 한국스포츠심리학회 14 (14): 95-109, 2003

    8 김종욱, "스포츠지도자의 리더십과 선수의 자기관리 및 경기력의 관계" 한국체육학회 46 (46): 335-343, 2007

    9 허정훈, "대학운동 선수들의 자기관리 전략: 평소연습과 시합상황의 비교" 40 (40): 187-198, 2001

    10 조현익, "대학 운동선수의 자기관리가 운동몰입 및 운동만족도에 미치는 영향" 한국체육학회 46 (46): 205-218, 2007

    11 허정훈, "국가대표 선수들의 자기관리 전략: 질적 연구" 한국스포츠심리학회 15 (15): 27-52, 2004

    12 박석래, "고등학교 운동선수들의자기관리 전략분석" 순천대학교 대학원 2003

    13 이금주, "경마선수들의 자기관리가 운동몰입 및 선수만족에 미치는 영향" 한국체육대학교 2005

    14 Gould, D., "Sources of stress experienced by national champion figure skaters" U.S Olympic Committee 1993

    15 Crews, D., "Self-regulation strategies in sport and exercise. In: Handbook on research in sport psychology" Macmillan Publishing Company 557-568, 1993

    16 Orlick T., "Mental links to excellence" 2 : 105-130, 1988

    17 Loehr, J., "Athletic Excellence : Mental Toughness Training for Sports" Forum Publishing Company 1982

    18 Jackson, S., "Athletes in flow: A qualitative investigation of flow states in slite figure skaters" 4 : 161-180, 1992

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2002-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.32 1.32 1.66
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.52 1.58 1.732 0.35
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼