RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    소상공인 경쟁력 강화를 위한 가산세제도의 개선방안 = Improvements of Penalty Tax to Strength Competitiveness of Small and Micro Business

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104296222

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Small and micro businesses are very limited in scale and having full-time employees of less than 10. Given the circumstances, this study intends to come up with a proposed improvement for the penalty tax system being applied to the defaults in fulfilling tax liabilities. Major improvement measures proposed are as follows:
    Firstly, it would be desirable to set up single penalty tax rate having a certain limit applicable to all unpaid taxes regardless of whether they are caused by a failure to file, incorrect filing or late payment. According to the Shoup report Japan came up with as a theoretical ground for the penalty tax, penalty tax continues to accrue until the total amount of the penalty tax reaches 30% of the original tax amount.
    Secondly, modified filing and overdue filing should be evolved into a system that provides more opportunities for those who failed to file within the prescribed time. Except to the extent that incorrect filing or failure to file have been committed with the expectation that the tax authorities would change or determine the taxable amount, exemption of penalty taxes be granted any time to all cases of such incorrect filing and/or failure to file.
    Thirdly, imposition of the penalty tax constitutes a restriction on citizen’s property right and the justifiable grounds to impose it should be regulated by the law in accordance with the principle of “no taxation without legal basis” The penalty tax rate applicable to the failure to provide supporting evidences with the filing should be reduced down to 1% or removed. Penalty tax for the failure to use business accounts should be abolished gradually and, if maintained, better be transformed into a system whereby tax benefits including tax credit be granted for those who comply rather than imposing penalty taxes to those who fail.
    Fifthly, in view of the regulation that makes it obligatory to use and issue legal receipts and the fact that any violation of this is subjected to sanctions including penalty taxes, issuance of legal receipts is expected to become generalized and it could be considered that the ceiling amount of each such receipt be raised or the system abolished. At any rate, the limit of penalty taxes applicable to the small and micro businesses should be differentiated considering realities.
    번역하기

    Small and micro businesses are very limited in scale and having full-time employees of less than 10. Given the circumstances, this study intends to come up with a proposed improvement for the penalty tax system being applied to the defaults in fulfi...

    Small and micro businesses are very limited in scale and having full-time employees of less than 10. Given the circumstances, this study intends to come up with a proposed improvement for the penalty tax system being applied to the defaults in fulfilling tax liabilities. Major improvement measures proposed are as follows:
    Firstly, it would be desirable to set up single penalty tax rate having a certain limit applicable to all unpaid taxes regardless of whether they are caused by a failure to file, incorrect filing or late payment. According to the Shoup report Japan came up with as a theoretical ground for the penalty tax, penalty tax continues to accrue until the total amount of the penalty tax reaches 30% of the original tax amount.
    Secondly, modified filing and overdue filing should be evolved into a system that provides more opportunities for those who failed to file within the prescribed time. Except to the extent that incorrect filing or failure to file have been committed with the expectation that the tax authorities would change or determine the taxable amount, exemption of penalty taxes be granted any time to all cases of such incorrect filing and/or failure to file.
    Thirdly, imposition of the penalty tax constitutes a restriction on citizen’s property right and the justifiable grounds to impose it should be regulated by the law in accordance with the principle of “no taxation without legal basis” The penalty tax rate applicable to the failure to provide supporting evidences with the filing should be reduced down to 1% or removed. Penalty tax for the failure to use business accounts should be abolished gradually and, if maintained, better be transformed into a system whereby tax benefits including tax credit be granted for those who comply rather than imposing penalty taxes to those who fail.
    Fifthly, in view of the regulation that makes it obligatory to use and issue legal receipts and the fact that any violation of this is subjected to sanctions including penalty taxes, issuance of legal receipts is expected to become generalized and it could be considered that the ceiling amount of each such receipt be raised or the system abolished. At any rate, the limit of penalty taxes applicable to the small and micro businesses should be differentiated considering realities.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 신중식, "현행 국세법상 가산세제도 개선에 관한 연구" 건국대학교 행정대학원 2008

    2 송쌍종, "지방세 가산세 제도의 입법론적 고찰" 한국지방재정공제회 (5) : 2002

    3 한상국, "주요국의 가산세제도"

    4 최명근, "세법학 총론" 세경사 2005

    5 "세법전" ㈜영화조세통람사 2009

    6 김성수, "세무학논집 in: 가산세 제도에 관한 연구"

    7 국세청, "가산세 집행실무 해설"

    1 신중식, "현행 국세법상 가산세제도 개선에 관한 연구" 건국대학교 행정대학원 2008

    2 송쌍종, "지방세 가산세 제도의 입법론적 고찰" 한국지방재정공제회 (5) : 2002

    3 한상국, "주요국의 가산세제도"

    4 최명근, "세법학 총론" 세경사 2005

    5 "세법전" ㈜영화조세통람사 2009

    6 김성수, "세무학논집 in: 가산세 제도에 관한 연구"

    7 국세청, "가산세 집행실무 해설"

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.23 1.23 1.14
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.29 1.2 2.08 0.23
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼