RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    한국전쟁기 북한의 점령과 지방사회의 변화 ― 경기도 시흥군의 사례 ― = North Korean Occupation of South Korea and the Change of Rural Society during the Korean War ― Case Study of Sihueng Gun County, Kyonggi Do Province ―

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104143737

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Siheung County was occupied by North Korea during the early period of Korean War. The two and half months of occupation by North Korea reflected general aspects of North Korean occupation policies as well as particular characters of Siheung County case.
    The most distinguishing character of North Korean occupation policies was that North Korea aimed long-term and permanent occupation of South Korea. The occupation administration was prepared with extreme care and meticulousness by North Korea. And it was readjustment of North Korean administration system into South Korea. The restoration of county branch of Korean Labor Party(KLP), the temporary Peoples’ Committee, and social groups started shortly after the occupation of Siheung County in July 3. The administration of North Korean occupation was well organized and efficient.
    Second, the occupation was long time as well as long-range prepared by North Korea. The administrative officers down to the county, towns, and villages’ level were selected with the native Koreans, but the officers of core power structure such as Labor Party and Police Department were dispatched from North Korea.
    Third, the Sihueng County branch of KLP was very weak during the North Korean occupation period. The registered members of KLP Sihueng County branch were seventy three in August 10, 1950. And the political influence of Bodoyeonmang(National Guidance League: NGL) members was very strong in case of Suam town of Sihueng County. The KLP expelled the so called friend parties such as Social Democracy Party and Labor Peoples Party from the political scene and they deported the members of friend parties to the volunteer army for cutting their influence in the community.
    Fourth, the occupation authority focused on two projects, the election of Peoples’ Committee and land reform. After the accomplishment of two projects, farmers and laborers became the key figures in power structure.
    Fifth, the land reform in Sihueng County started in July 20 and finished in August 9. It was announced that lands of land-lords were confiscated and redistributed to the tenants and poor peasants within 20 days. Total 9,818 families and approximately 54,980 people of Siheung County were distributed the confiscated lands. It occupied 61 percent of total Siheung population. But the size of distributed lands was not sufficient for self-sufficiency.
    Sixth, the NGL members of Siheung County played active roles during the North Korean occupation. The occupation authorities wanted their cooperation but were suspicious of their loyalty and sincerity as a communist. Two sides managed tensed relations during the occupation.
    번역하기

    Siheung County was occupied by North Korea during the early period of Korean War. The two and half months of occupation by North Korea reflected general aspects of North Korean occupation policies as well as particular characters of Siheung County cas...

    Siheung County was occupied by North Korea during the early period of Korean War. The two and half months of occupation by North Korea reflected general aspects of North Korean occupation policies as well as particular characters of Siheung County case.
    The most distinguishing character of North Korean occupation policies was that North Korea aimed long-term and permanent occupation of South Korea. The occupation administration was prepared with extreme care and meticulousness by North Korea. And it was readjustment of North Korean administration system into South Korea. The restoration of county branch of Korean Labor Party(KLP), the temporary Peoples’ Committee, and social groups started shortly after the occupation of Siheung County in July 3. The administration of North Korean occupation was well organized and efficient.
    Second, the occupation was long time as well as long-range prepared by North Korea. The administrative officers down to the county, towns, and villages’ level were selected with the native Koreans, but the officers of core power structure such as Labor Party and Police Department were dispatched from North Korea.
    Third, the Sihueng County branch of KLP was very weak during the North Korean occupation period. The registered members of KLP Sihueng County branch were seventy three in August 10, 1950. And the political influence of Bodoyeonmang(National Guidance League: NGL) members was very strong in case of Suam town of Sihueng County. The KLP expelled the so called friend parties such as Social Democracy Party and Labor Peoples Party from the political scene and they deported the members of friend parties to the volunteer army for cutting their influence in the community.
    Fourth, the occupation authority focused on two projects, the election of Peoples’ Committee and land reform. After the accomplishment of two projects, farmers and laborers became the key figures in power structure.
    Fifth, the land reform in Sihueng County started in July 20 and finished in August 9. It was announced that lands of land-lords were confiscated and redistributed to the tenants and poor peasants within 20 days. Total 9,818 families and approximately 54,980 people of Siheung County were distributed the confiscated lands. It occupied 61 percent of total Siheung population. But the size of distributed lands was not sufficient for self-sufficiency.
    Sixth, the NGL members of Siheung County played active roles during the North Korean occupation. The occupation authorities wanted their cooperation but were suspicious of their loyalty and sincerity as a communist. Two sides managed tensed relations during the occupation.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 서용선, "한국전쟁시 점령정책 연구, In 한국전쟁연구: 점령정책·노무운용·동원" 국방군사연구소 1998

    2 장상환, "한국전쟁기 진주지역의 사회변동" 12 : 1996

    3 김수현, "한국전쟁기 북한의 점령지 지배정책 : 부여지역 사례를 중심으로" 한양대학교 대학원 2006

    4 김태우, "한국전쟁기 북한의 남한 점령지역 토지개혁" 역사문제연구소 (70) : 243-273, 2005

    5 이현주, "한국전쟁기 ‘조선인민군’ 점령하의 서울 - 서울시임시인민위원회를 중심으로-" 서울학연구소 (31) : 203-235, 2008

    6 한모니까, "한국전쟁 전후 '수복지구'의 체제 변동 과정 : 강원도 인제군을 중심으로" 가톨릭대학교 대학원 2009

    7 정병준, "한국 농지개혁 재검토" 역사문제연구소 (65) : 117-157, 2003

    8 진실화해를위한과거사정리위원회, "조사보고서" 진실·화해를위한과거사정리위원회 2011

    9 지수걸, "일제하 농민조합운동연구 : 1930년대 혁명적 농민조합운동" 역사비평사 1993

    10 손전후, "우리나라 토지개혁사" 과학백과사전출판사 1983

    1 서용선, "한국전쟁시 점령정책 연구, In 한국전쟁연구: 점령정책·노무운용·동원" 국방군사연구소 1998

    2 장상환, "한국전쟁기 진주지역의 사회변동" 12 : 1996

    3 김수현, "한국전쟁기 북한의 점령지 지배정책 : 부여지역 사례를 중심으로" 한양대학교 대학원 2006

    4 김태우, "한국전쟁기 북한의 남한 점령지역 토지개혁" 역사문제연구소 (70) : 243-273, 2005

    5 이현주, "한국전쟁기 ‘조선인민군’ 점령하의 서울 - 서울시임시인민위원회를 중심으로-" 서울학연구소 (31) : 203-235, 2008

    6 한모니까, "한국전쟁 전후 '수복지구'의 체제 변동 과정 : 강원도 인제군을 중심으로" 가톨릭대학교 대학원 2009

    7 정병준, "한국 농지개혁 재검토" 역사문제연구소 (65) : 117-157, 2003

    8 진실화해를위한과거사정리위원회, "조사보고서" 진실·화해를위한과거사정리위원회 2011

    9 지수걸, "일제하 농민조합운동연구 : 1930년대 혁명적 농민조합운동" 역사비평사 1993

    10 손전후, "우리나라 토지개혁사" 과학백과사전출판사 1983

    11 김성칠, "역사앞에서" 창비 2009

    12 "서울시및경기도토지개혁실행위원회사업정형에 대하여: 농림성 남반부 토지개혁지도위원회 제2차 위원회 결정서(1950.8.2) RG 242, SA 2010, 4/76"

    13 박명림, "북한의 남한통치 II: 토지혁명과 사회경제변혁, In 한국 1950: 전쟁과 평화" 나남 2002

    14 서중석, "미국 문서로 본 한국전쟁과학살: 전쟁 속의 또 다른 전쟁" 선인 2011

    15 박찬승, "마을로 간 한국전쟁" 돌베개 2010

    16 양지은, "농지개혁과 한국농촌사회 변동 : 전라남도 담양군 사례를 중심으로" 이화여자대학교 대학원 2000

    17 "경기도 시흥군 서면 좌익인사 양심서철 RG 242, SA 2009, 7/67"

    18 "一九五○년八월一일~八월 一○일 각면당부 정치정세보고철 선전선동부 RG 242"

    19 "Psychological Warfare Research Report no.1: A Preliminary Study of the Impact of Communist upon Korea" United States Air Force, Air University, Human Resources Research Institute, Maxwell Air Force Base 1951

    20 "Economic Aspects of Land Reform in South Korea" 1951

    21 "1950년도 문서접수부(시흥내무서) SA 2009, Box 4, Item 108.2"

    22 "1950년도 기밀문서접수부(시흥내무서 기요계) SA 2009, Box 4, Item 108.1"

    23 "1950년도 기밀문서발송부(시흥내무서 기요계) SA 2009, Box 4, Item 56"

    24 김양식, "1950년대 충북지역 유지층의 변동과 그 성격" 한국학중앙연구원 26 (26): 53-77, 2003

    25 김경현, "1950년 진주 : 민중과 전쟁기억" 선인 2007

    26 "1950년 극비문서집(동면분주소) RG 242, SA 2010, 5/121"

    27 "1950년 7월 세포회의록집 (시흥군내무서 분세포) SA 2009, 1/47"

    28 "(1950년도) 기밀관게서류(하인천파출소) RG 242, SA 2009, 4/124"

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.66 0.66 0.71
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.65 0.62 1.675 0.11
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼