선진유학에서의 선악 개념 = The Concept of Good and Evil in Pre-Qin Confucianism

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

At the time of its emergence, good and evil were mostly used in a non-moral sense. At the end of the Spring and Autumn period, in ‘the Analects of Confucius’, it is sometimes seen that good and evil are used in a moral sense. However, there was not much connection between the values of Confucianism, such as In-ui-ye-ji. In ‘Mencius’, good and evil are increasingly used in a moral sense, and begin to show relevance to other values of Confucianism. In particular, because Mencius claimed the theory that human nature is good, goodness and virtue became connected through the nature. When it comes to ‘Xunzi’, the good is mostly used as a moral value, increasingly being referred to in connection with the core value of Confucianism. Therefore, it may not be a reasonable question to ask what is good and evil in ‘the Analects of Confucius’, but when it comes to ‘Mencius’ and ‘Xunzi’, it is possible to ask what their good and evil are and what meaning they have today.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김철호, "호굉과 주희의 성선(性善) 해석 비교" 철학연구소 (32) : 29-64, 2006

2 김철호, "주자의 선악론 연구" 한국학중앙연구원 한국학대학원 2006

3 김철호, "주자 도덕교육론의 구도- 맹자？순자？양웅과의 비교 -" 동양철학연구회 (48) : 281-318, 2006

4 William K. Frankena, "윤리학" 종로서적 1984

5 이지형, "역주 다산 맹자요의" 현대실학사 1994

6 김철호, "순자 선악론의 도덕교육적 의미" 한국초등도덕교육학회 (58) : 69-92, 2017

7 김학주, "순자" 을유문화사 2001

8 신정근, "사람다움의 발견: 仁사상의 역사와 그 문화" 이학사 2005

9 김형효, "물학 심학 실학" 청계 2003

10 성백효, "맹자집주" 전통문화연구원 1993

11 동양고전연구회, "맹자" 민음사 2016

12 신정근, "동중서: 중화주의의 개막" 태학사 2004

13 Alasdair MacIntyre, "덕의 상실" 문예출판사 1997

14 성백효, "논어집주" 전통문화연구원 1998

15 許愼, "說文解字注" 上海古籍出版社 1988

16 胡宏, "胡宏集" 中華書局 1987

17 荀悅, "申鑒" 동서문화사 2012

18 藤堂明保, "漢字語源辭典" 學燈社 1980

19 허탁, "朱子語類 1-4권" 청계 1998

20 "朱子全書 1-27책" 上海古籍出版社, 安徽敎育出版社 2002

21 張玉書, "康熙字典" 啓業書局有限公司 1957

22 王先謙, "『荀子集解』, 漢文大系 本 제15권"

23 John Knoblock, "XunZi, Vol. 1-3" Stanford University Press 1990

24 Richard J. Bernstein, "Radical Evil: A Philosophical Interrogation" Polity Press 2002