The purpose of this study is to analyze the effect size of authenticity of learning affects the field application and the mediating effect size of meaningfulness of learning and learning flow in the context of corporate education. Accordingly, the res...
The purpose of this study is to analyze the effect size of authenticity of learning affects the field application and the mediating effect size of meaningfulness of learning and learning flow in the context of corporate education. Accordingly, the research problems of this study are as follows.
1. What is the effect of authenticity of learning on field application in corporate education?
2. What is the mediating effect of meaningfulness of learning in the relationship between authenticity of learning and field application in corporate education?
2-1. What is the effect of authenticity of learning on meaningfulness of learning in corporate education?
2-2. What is the effect of authenticity of learning on field application in corporate education?
3. What is the mediating effect of flow of learning in the relationship between authenticity of learning and field application in corporate education?
3-1. What is the effect of authenticity of learning on flow of learning in corporate education?
3-2. What is the effect of flow of learning on field application in corporate education?
4. What is the dual mediating effect of authenticity of learning in corporate education leading to meaningfulness of learning, flow of learning, and field application?
In order to solve the research questions, a research model was established based on the theoretical background, and a convenience sampling was conducted on office workers in large domestic companies from late September to early October 2024. A total of 325 people were distributed the survey through an online survey. A total of 251 people responded to the questionnaire, and 235 of them, excluding 16 unfaithful respondents, were used in the final analysis. In order to conduct an analysis appropriate to the purpose of this study, the following procedures were used using SPSS 25.0 for Windows and AMOS 25.0 programs.
First, descriptive statistics for each variable, correlation between variables, and reliability analysis were performed. Through this, it was confirmed whether the assumption of normality was satisfied and whether multicollinearity was violated. Second, the fit of the model was measured in the order of confirmatory factor analysis, measurement model, and structural model. For the goodness-of-fit evaluation, χ2, CFI, RMSEA, SRMR, TLI, and IFI indices were reviewed. Third, the relationship, direct effect, and indirect effect between each variable were confirmed using the structural equation. In addition, each indirect effect was decomposed through fandom variable modeling and the mediating effect was finally verified through bootstrap. Based on the above investigation and analysis, the following conclusions were drawn in this study.
First, it was found that authenticity of learning had a significant effect on meaningfulness of learning, learning flow, and field application. As a result of dividing the direct and indirect effects, it was found that authenticity of learning was positively significant with each variable.
Second, when examining the mediating effect of meaningfulness of learning and learning flow in the relationship between authenticity of learning and field application, the mediating effect of learning flow was found to be significant, but the indirect relationship between meaningfulness of learning and field application was found to be significant in verifying the mediating effect of meaningfulness of learning.
Third, in the relationship between authenticity of learning and field application, the dual mediating effect of meaningfulness of learning and learning flow was found to be statistically significant.
However, in the relationship between each variable, all of the total effects were found to be statistically significant.