RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    중재판정에 대한 베트남 법원의 취소 사례 분석과 개선 방안 = Analyzing Arbitration Award Annulment Cases in Viet Nam Courts and Exploring Strategies for Enhancement

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T16940877

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The arbitration award represents the final decision of the Arbitration Council, resolving the entire dispute outlined in the complaint, concluding the arbitration proceedings, and standing as final and binding on the parties. Following international practices, the annulment of an arbitration award is a legal procedure conducted by the court to review whether the issued arbitration award fully complies with the provisions of the order and trial procedures of commercial arbitration, following the law. In Vietnam, the right to request the annulment of an arbitration award is specified in Article 69, and the grounds for annulment are outlined in Article 68 of the 2010 Commercial Arbitration Law. In recent years, domestic disputes have accounted for approximately 70% of cases and are on the rise, particularly in Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) enterprises. Despite commercial arbitration being a swift method of dispute resolution with various advantages, concerns have been raised about the potential annulment of arbitration awards by the court. This article focuses solely on the current legal provisions related to arbitral awards. It compares the grounds for annulment of arbitral awards in Korea and China based on the practical application of the law regarding the annulment of arbitral awards. Through the analysis of case law on the annulment of arbitral awards, the limitations of grounds for annulment are clarified, and multiple solutions are provided to enhance legal regulations for annuling arbitration awards.
    번역하기

    The arbitration award represents the final decision of the Arbitration Council, resolving the entire dispute outlined in the complaint, concluding the arbitration proceedings, and standing as final and binding on the parties. Following international p...

    The arbitration award represents the final decision of the Arbitration Council, resolving the entire dispute outlined in the complaint, concluding the arbitration proceedings, and standing as final and binding on the parties. Following international practices, the annulment of an arbitration award is a legal procedure conducted by the court to review whether the issued arbitration award fully complies with the provisions of the order and trial procedures of commercial arbitration, following the law. In Vietnam, the right to request the annulment of an arbitration award is specified in Article 69, and the grounds for annulment are outlined in Article 68 of the 2010 Commercial Arbitration Law. In recent years, domestic disputes have accounted for approximately 70% of cases and are on the rise, particularly in Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) enterprises. Despite commercial arbitration being a swift method of dispute resolution with various advantages, concerns have been raised about the potential annulment of arbitration awards by the court. This article focuses solely on the current legal provisions related to arbitral awards. It compares the grounds for annulment of arbitral awards in Korea and China based on the practical application of the law regarding the annulment of arbitral awards. Through the analysis of case law on the annulment of arbitral awards, the limitations of grounds for annulment are clarified, and multiple solutions are provided to enhance legal regulations for annuling arbitration awards.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서론 1
    • 1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 1
    • 2. 연구의 범위 및 방법 2
    • 3. 선행연구 · 2
    • Ⅱ. 베트남 중재관련 법제 개관 5
    • Ⅰ. 서론 1
    • 1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 1
    • 2. 연구의 범위 및 방법 2
    • 3. 선행연구 · 2
    • Ⅱ. 베트남 중재관련 법제 개관 5
    • 1. 베트남 중재법 제정 과정 5
    • 2. 베트남의 중재기관 · 7
    • 3. 외국중재와 섭외중재의 구분 12
    • Ⅲ. 중재판정 취소의 분석 14
    • 1. 중재판정 취소의 특성 14
    • 2. 중재판정의 취소 현황 15
    • 3. 중재판정의 취소 사유 15
    • 4. 한-중-베 상사 중재 취소 비교 · 23
    • 1) 한-중-베 상사 중재 취소 절차 · 23
    • 2) 한-중-베 상사 중재 취소 절차 비교 25
    • 3) 한-중 각국의 상사 중재 판정 취소 사유 27
    • Ⅳ. 중재판정 취소신청에 대한 판례 및 개선 방안 · 41
    • 1. 중재판정 취소신청에 대한 판례 41
    • 2. 개선방안 49
    • Ⅴ. 결론 52
    • 1. 연구의 요약 및 시사점 52
    • 2. 연구의 한계점 및 향후 연구방안 54
    • 참고문헌 56
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼