RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    소비자의 확정기여(DC)형 퇴직연금 관리역량 및 심리적 편향이 관리행동에 미치는 영향 = Effects of Consumers' Defined Contribution(DC) Retirement Pension Management Capability and Psychological bias on Management Behavior

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108245187

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study attempted to solve the problem that the subscribers of defined contribution(DC) retirement pensions are very passive in managing their pensions despite the investment decisions determining the asset size at the time of retirement. This study examined the retirement pension management capability and behavior of DC subscribers, to understand the current situation and determine the effect of the retirement pension management capability and psychological bias on the retirement pension management behavior.
    The Wiggins & McTighe (1998) method of organizing the hierarchy of knowledge (big ideas, core knowledge, and content that needs to be familiar) was used to clarify the details of management knowledge and management skill required for DC subscribers. As a result of the analysis, the level of retirement pension management capability of the DC subscribers in Korea was 74 points (out of 100 points), with the highest management attitude of 76.3 points, followed by management knowledge of 73.3 points and management skill of 67.9 points. In the case of management behavior, more subscribers did not act than those who did in the first stage (management goal setting and checking behavior) or in the third stage (management execution behavior). In the second stage (management method search and comparison behavior), the information search behavior was relatively higher than that of the other management stages. In the fourth stage (management performance evaluation behavior), the subscribers regularly check the management performance but are passive in reflecting the results in their investment portfolios.
    An analysis of the effect of DC retirement pension management capability on management behavior found a statistically significant effect on the overall management behavior and each stage of the management behavior. In other words, the higher the retirement pension management capability, the more actively the retirement pension is managed. This is commonly applied to all stages of retirement pension management. The methods were compared and searched, and the execution and management performance evaluations were more active.
    These results confirm that a higher level of retirement pension management capability indicates a higher level of management behavior. Moreover, these results can be used as an empirical basis to prove that retirement pension management capability needs to be improved for active retirement pension management behavior. Finally, as a result of examining the moderating effect of psychological bias on the effect of retirement pension management capability on retirement pension management behavior, the moderating effect of self-confidence in the second stage(management method search and comparison behavior) and the moderating effect of status quo bias in the fourth stage(management performance evaluation behavior) were confirmed.
    번역하기

    This study attempted to solve the problem that the subscribers of defined contribution(DC) retirement pensions are very passive in managing their pensions despite the investment decisions determining the asset size at the time of retirement. This stud...

    This study attempted to solve the problem that the subscribers of defined contribution(DC) retirement pensions are very passive in managing their pensions despite the investment decisions determining the asset size at the time of retirement. This study examined the retirement pension management capability and behavior of DC subscribers, to understand the current situation and determine the effect of the retirement pension management capability and psychological bias on the retirement pension management behavior.
    The Wiggins & McTighe (1998) method of organizing the hierarchy of knowledge (big ideas, core knowledge, and content that needs to be familiar) was used to clarify the details of management knowledge and management skill required for DC subscribers. As a result of the analysis, the level of retirement pension management capability of the DC subscribers in Korea was 74 points (out of 100 points), with the highest management attitude of 76.3 points, followed by management knowledge of 73.3 points and management skill of 67.9 points. In the case of management behavior, more subscribers did not act than those who did in the first stage (management goal setting and checking behavior) or in the third stage (management execution behavior). In the second stage (management method search and comparison behavior), the information search behavior was relatively higher than that of the other management stages. In the fourth stage (management performance evaluation behavior), the subscribers regularly check the management performance but are passive in reflecting the results in their investment portfolios.
    An analysis of the effect of DC retirement pension management capability on management behavior found a statistically significant effect on the overall management behavior and each stage of the management behavior. In other words, the higher the retirement pension management capability, the more actively the retirement pension is managed. This is commonly applied to all stages of retirement pension management. The methods were compared and searched, and the execution and management performance evaluations were more active.
    These results confirm that a higher level of retirement pension management capability indicates a higher level of management behavior. Moreover, these results can be used as an empirical basis to prove that retirement pension management capability needs to be improved for active retirement pension management behavior. Finally, as a result of examining the moderating effect of psychological bias on the effect of retirement pension management capability on retirement pension management behavior, the moderating effect of self-confidence in the second stage(management method search and comparison behavior) and the moderating effect of status quo bias in the fourth stage(management performance evaluation behavior) were confirmed.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 고용노동부, "확정기여형 퇴직연금제도 규약(안)"

    2 김혜성 ; 이경희, "확정기여형 퇴직연금 가입자의 자산배분행동에 대한 연구- 1개 대기업 제도를 중심으로" 한국리스크관리학회 24 (24): 3-39, 2013

    3 송인욱 ; 이경희, "확정기여형 퇴직연금 가입자의 연령이 위험선호에 미치는 영향" 한국증권학회 48 (48): 675-695, 2019

    4 장경영 ; 최현자, "확정기여(DC)형 퇴직연금 투자 시뮬레이션 경험이 DC형 가입자의 적립금 관리태도에 미치는 영향" 한국FP학회 13 (13): 73-101, 2020

    5 금융감독원, "행복한 동행 퇴직연금, 퇴직연금 가이드북"

    6 "한국경제신문"

    7 반정호, "한국 기업의 퇴직연금제 선호에 관한 연구 : 퇴직연금제 도입여부와 제도유형을 중심으로" 한국노동연구원 5 (5): 101-133, 2005

    8 배종원 ; 송인욱 ; 이경희, "퇴직연금제도의 메뉴효과: 사용자의 주식라인업 비중이 가입자의 주식투자에 미치는 영향을 중심으로" 한국금융학회 33 (33): 21-50, 2019

    9 임두빈, "퇴직연금제도 선택에 관한 기업의 결정요인 분석" 2 (2): 27-56, 2012

    10 금융투자협회, "퇴직연금 운용실태조사 결과보고서" 2018

    1 고용노동부, "확정기여형 퇴직연금제도 규약(안)"

    2 김혜성 ; 이경희, "확정기여형 퇴직연금 가입자의 자산배분행동에 대한 연구- 1개 대기업 제도를 중심으로" 한국리스크관리학회 24 (24): 3-39, 2013

    3 송인욱 ; 이경희, "확정기여형 퇴직연금 가입자의 연령이 위험선호에 미치는 영향" 한국증권학회 48 (48): 675-695, 2019

    4 장경영 ; 최현자, "확정기여(DC)형 퇴직연금 투자 시뮬레이션 경험이 DC형 가입자의 적립금 관리태도에 미치는 영향" 한국FP학회 13 (13): 73-101, 2020

    5 금융감독원, "행복한 동행 퇴직연금, 퇴직연금 가이드북"

    6 "한국경제신문"

    7 반정호, "한국 기업의 퇴직연금제 선호에 관한 연구 : 퇴직연금제 도입여부와 제도유형을 중심으로" 한국노동연구원 5 (5): 101-133, 2005

    8 배종원 ; 송인욱 ; 이경희, "퇴직연금제도의 메뉴효과: 사용자의 주식라인업 비중이 가입자의 주식투자에 미치는 영향을 중심으로" 한국금융학회 33 (33): 21-50, 2019

    9 임두빈, "퇴직연금제도 선택에 관한 기업의 결정요인 분석" 2 (2): 27-56, 2012

    10 금융투자협회, "퇴직연금 운용실태조사 결과보고서" 2018

    11 금융감독원, "퇴직연금 시장 관행 혁신방안" 2018

    12 이경희, "퇴직연금 가입자의 추가 납입 행동에 대한 사례 연구" 한국리스크관리학회 28 (28): 95-128, 2017

    13 주소현, "우리나라 펀드투자자의 펀드투자 의사결정에 따른 투자행태" 2 (2): 75-102, 2009

    14 백은영, "우리나라 투자자의 자기과신 성향" 4 (4): 29-52, 2011

    15 권순원 ; 위경우 ; 김봄이, "우리나라 기업의 퇴직연금 선택요인에 관한 연구" 한국경제의 분석패널 16 (16): 123-181, 2010

    16 이기춘, "소비자재무설계" 학현사 2009

    17 유현정 ; 주소현, "소비자의 식품안전 체감 및 역량척도 개발 연구" 한국소비자학회 23 (23): 79-104, 2012

    18 김정현, "소비자 재무관리역량 척도 및 지수 개발 연구" 서울대학교 대학원 2011

    19 민재형, "불확실성하에서의 개인의 투자행태 및 투자결정요인" 15 (15): 111-132, 2004

    20 김해경, "백워드 설계 관점에서 본 2015 개정 미술과 교육과정 분석 연구: 내용 체계를 중심으로" 한국초등미술교육학회 63 : 65-87, 2020

    21 박혜영, "디지털재화 소비자의 소비자역량에 관한 연구" 서울대학교 대학원 2010

    22 김지혜, "디지털 소비자역량 척도개발 및 진단 연구" 서울대학교 2021

    23 박주현 ; 이명규, "독서태도 모델 개발 연구" 한국도서관·정보학회 46 (46): 271-297, 2015

    24 김병옥, "기업의 퇴직연금제도 선택에 관한 연구" 숭실대학교 대학원 2011

    25 김대환 ; 류건식, "기업의 퇴직연금 전환 연구" 한국리스크관리학회 23 (23): 27-50, 2012

    26 이지윤, "금융소비자의 펀드관리행동에 대한 탐색적 연구-보유펀드 정보확인을 중심으로" 6 (6): 63-92, 2017

    27 김재휘 ; 한미영, "개인투자자의 자기고양적 지각과 투자확신이 위험투자행동에 미치는 영향" 한국문화및사회문제심리학회 13 (13): 89-109, 2007

    28 최신애, "가계의 은퇴자금으로서 퇴직연금의 자산배분에 대한 한미간 비교연구: OECD 패널자료 및 근로자심층면접 분석" 한국소비자학회 25 (25): 121-152, 2014

    29 손지연 ; 사지연, "「한국의 소비자역량지표」의 타당화 연구" 한국소비자원 48 (48): 81-108, 2017

    30 Yamaguchi, T., "Winners and Losers: 401(K) Trading and Portfolio Performance" Michigan Retirement Research Center Research 2007

    31 Ameriks, J., "Wealth Accumulation and the Propensity to Plan" 118 : 1007-1047, 2003

    32 Odean, T., "Volume, Volatility, Price, and Profit When All Traders Are Above Average" 53 (53): 1887-1934, 1998

    33 Wiggins, G., "Understanding by design" Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development 1998

    34 Madrian, B. C., "The power of suggestion: Inertia in 401(k)participation and savings behavior" 1149-1187, 2001

    35 Basu, A. K., "The appropriateness of default investment options in defined contribution plans : Australian evidence" 18 : 290-305, 2010

    36 Moore, D., "The Trouble with Overconfidence" 115 (115): 502-517, 2008

    37 Mitchell, O. S., "The Inattentive Participant: Portfolio Trading Behavior in 401(k) Plans" The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania 2006

    38 Lusardi, A., "The Economic Importance of Financial Literacy : Theory and Evidence" 52 (52): 5-44, 2014

    39 McClelland, D. C., "Testing for competence rather than for intelligence" 28 (28): 1-14, 1973

    40 Samuelson, W., "Status quo bias in decision making" 1 (1): 7-59, 1988

    41 Lu, T., "Social interactions in asset allocation decisions : Evidence from 401(k)pension plan investors" 159 : 1-14, 2019

    42 Xiao, Q., "Revisiting the status quo bias : Replication of Samuelson and Zeckhauser(1988)" 5 : 1-21, 2021

    43 Hershey, D. A., "Psychological Foundations of Financial Planning for Retirement" 14 : 26-36, 2007

    44 Baker, H. K., "Psychological Biases of Investors" 11 : 97-116, 2002

    45 Collins, D., "Portfolios of the Poor-How the World's Poor Live on $2 a Day" Princeton University Press 2009

    46 Bilias, Y., "Portfolio Inertia and Stock Market Fluctuations" 42 (42): 715-742, 2010

    47 Agnew, J., "Portfolio Choice and Trading in a Large 401(k) Plan" 93 (93): 193-215, 2003

    48 Lusardi, A., "Pension Design and Structure: New Lessons from Behavioral Finance" Oxford University Press 2004

    49 Suri, G., "Patient inertia and the status quo bias : When an inferior option is preferred" 24 (24): 1763-1769, 2013

    50 OECD, "PISA 2012 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science, Problem Solving and Financial Literacy" OECD Publishing 2013

    51 Grezo, M., "Overconfidence and financial decision-making : a meta-analysis" 13 (13): 276-296, 2020

    52 Lee, B., "Myopic loss aversion and stock investments : An empirical study of private investors" 70 : 235-246, 2016

    53 Aiken, L. S., "Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions" Sage Publications, Inc 1991

    54 White, R. W., "Motivation Reconsidered : The Concept of Competence" 66 (66): 297-333, 1959

    55 Aren, S., "Moderation effect of pleasure seeking and loss aversion in the relationship between personality traits and risky investment intention" 2021

    56 Van Schalkwyk, C. H., "Member choice in a defined contribution pension plan : decision-making factors" University of Johannesburg 2012

    57 Ragheb, G., "Measuring Leisure Attitude" 14 (14): 155-167, 1982

    58 Financial Services Authority, "Measuring Financial Capability : an Exploratory Study" 2005

    59 Tversky, A., "Loss aversion in riskless choice : A reference dependent model" 106 (106): 1039-1061, 1991

    60 Kimball, M., "Investor Sophistication and the Home Bias, Diversification, and Employer Stock Puzzles"

    61 Graham, J., "Investor Competence, Trading Frequency, and Home Bias" 55 (55): 1094-1106, 2009

    62 Hilgert, M., "Household Financial Management : The Connection Between Knowledge and Behavior" 89 : 309-322, 2003

    63 Benartzi, S., "Heuristics and Biases in Retirement Savings Behavior" 21 (21): 81-104, 2007

    64 Shah, S., "Heuristic biases in investment decisionmaking and perceived market efficiency-A survey at the Pakistan stock exchange" 10 (10): 85-110, 2017

    65 Lerner, J. S., "Heart strings and purse strings : Carryover effects of emotions on economic decisions" 15 : 337-341, 2004

    66 Adler, M., "Gazing into the oracle : the Delphi method and its application to social policy and public health" Jessica Kingsley Publishers 1996

    67 Carmon, Z., "Focusing on the forgone : How value can appear so different to buyers and sellers" 27 : 360-370, 2000

    68 Skagerlund, K., "Financial literacy and the role of numeracy–How individuals’ attitude and affinity with numbers influence financial literacy" 74 : 18-25, 2018

    69 van Rooij, M., "Financial literacy and stock market participation" 101 (101): 449-472, 2011

    70 Dolvin, S. D., "Financial education and asset allocation" 15 : 133-149, 2006

    71 Gale, W. G., "Financial Literacy: What Works? How Could it be More Effective?"

    72 van Rooij, M., "Financial Literacy, Retirement Planning and Household Wealth" 122 (122): 449-478, 2012

    73 Hastings, J. S., "Financial Literacy, Financial Education and Economic Outcomes" NBER 2012

    74 Lusardi, A., "Financial Literacy and Planning: Implications for Retirement Wellbeing" Pension Research Council 2006

    75 Hogarth, J. M., "Financial Literacy and Family & Consumer Sciences" 94 (94): 14-28, 2002

    76 Financial Services Authority, "Financial Capability : A Behavioural Economics Perspective" 2008

    77 Hung, A., "Defining and measuring financial literacy" RAND Corporation 2009

    78 Białowolski, P., "Decomposition of the Financial Capability Construct : A Structural Model of Debt Knowledge, Skills, Confidence, Attitudes, and Behavior" 32 (32): 5-20, 2021

    79 Montier, J., "Darwin's mind: the evolutionary foundations of heuristics and biases"

    80 Iyengar, S. S., "Choice proliferation, simplicity seeking, and asset allocation" 94 : 530-539, 2010

    81 Koehler, D. J., "Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making" John Wiley & Sons 2008

    82 Glaser, M., "Behavioral Finance" University of Mannheim 2003

    83 Johnson, E. J., "Aspects of endowment : A query theory of value construction" 33 : 461-474, 2007

    84 Chuang, W., "An empirical evaluation of the overconfidence hypothesis" 30 (30): 2489-2515, 2006

    85 Sohn, S. H., "Adolescents' financial literacy: The role of financial socialization agents, financial experiences, and money attitudes in shaping financial literacy among South Korean youth" 35 : 969-980, 2012

    86 고용노동부, "2020년도 퇴직연금 적립금 운용현황 통계"

    87 통계청, "2019년 퇴직연금통계"

    88 통계청, "2016년 퇴직연금통계"

    89 이광우 ; 정영근, "2015 개정 교과 교육과정 내용 체계구성의 반성적 고찰- 핵심개념, 일반화된 지식, 기능을 중심으로 -" 학습자중심교과교육학회 17 (17): 597-622, 2017

    90 손지연, "2014 한국의 소비자역량지표" 1-326, 2014

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2028 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2022-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2014-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.16 1.16 1.35
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0 0 1.413 0.27
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼