RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      영어 처소 표현의 논항 지향성에 관한 연구 = (A) Study of argument orientation on locative phrases

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T10725717

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of this study is to investigate argument orientations of locative prepositional phrases and state general characteristics of argument orientation on locative prepositional phrases from the text analysis. Based on the four semantic properties of locative prepositional phrases, this paper argues that the basic modes of spatial cognition can be best identified in terms of location of events and participants. The ways of locating events and states are identified in terms of Argument Orientation.
      Four patterns of argument orientation described here reveal substantial modes of spatial cognition, and the argument orientation patterns are mostly determined by the semantic classes of English verbs combining with locative expressions, i.e., by the event type of the predicate. Also argument orientation can be approached with class of locative alternation verbs and class of agentive and non-agentive verbs.
      Argument orientation on locative pps in English attributes to semantic structure and features of verbs which can be analysed inherent property. However, there exists a problem to determine the patterns of argument orientation. That is interpretational ambiguity of sentence caused by context-dependable factors, pragmatic factors and syntatic factors of modification scope.
      The text analysis shows how these four arguments orientation patterns occur in the gradable textbooks used in the middle school and high school. We can also infer several general facts about argument orientation through this survey at the same time as below.
      First, transitive verbs which are combined with non-stative prepositional phrases always show one of three argument orientation types, that is, [O], [S + O] or [S x O]. Second, subject-object oriented pps can happen only with symmetric prepositional phrases. Third, verbs of judgement and verbs of psych can be combined with only subject-oriented locative pps. Forth, All locative alternation verbs have only object-orientation. Fifth, argument orientation mostly combines with stative prepositional phrases and shows high frequency of [O] and [S + O] in a general way. Also we can identify some characteristics of argument orientation through the text analysis. First, showing high frequency of agentive verbs and non-abentive verbs is common to all gradable textbooks in a distribution of combination with types of verbs and prepositional phrases. Second, [S] and [S x O] appear more in the high level textbooks than lower level textbooks. Third, all four patterns of argument orientation show much higher frequency in the middle textbooks over all.
      In conclusion, higher frequency of all four argument orientation patterns shows not in the high textbooks but in middle school textbooks over all. The reason is that there are a lot more visible, physical and specific words in the lower level textbooks than high level textbooks, but on the other hand there are much more abstractive and non-objective words in the high school textbook. Also the reason for the highest appearance of [O] among the four patterns might be explained as "Iconicity of Language", that is, locative phrases are closer to object argument than subject argument. Therefore, locative pps affect more the meaning of object than subject.
      It might be helpful for English learners when they translate English text into Korean. This text analysis can be practical application as a good material to help them understand English easier.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study is to investigate argument orientations of locative prepositional phrases and state general characteristics of argument orientation on locative prepositional phrases from the text analysis. Based on the four semantic properti...

      The purpose of this study is to investigate argument orientations of locative prepositional phrases and state general characteristics of argument orientation on locative prepositional phrases from the text analysis. Based on the four semantic properties of locative prepositional phrases, this paper argues that the basic modes of spatial cognition can be best identified in terms of location of events and participants. The ways of locating events and states are identified in terms of Argument Orientation.
      Four patterns of argument orientation described here reveal substantial modes of spatial cognition, and the argument orientation patterns are mostly determined by the semantic classes of English verbs combining with locative expressions, i.e., by the event type of the predicate. Also argument orientation can be approached with class of locative alternation verbs and class of agentive and non-agentive verbs.
      Argument orientation on locative pps in English attributes to semantic structure and features of verbs which can be analysed inherent property. However, there exists a problem to determine the patterns of argument orientation. That is interpretational ambiguity of sentence caused by context-dependable factors, pragmatic factors and syntatic factors of modification scope.
      The text analysis shows how these four arguments orientation patterns occur in the gradable textbooks used in the middle school and high school. We can also infer several general facts about argument orientation through this survey at the same time as below.
      First, transitive verbs which are combined with non-stative prepositional phrases always show one of three argument orientation types, that is, [O], [S + O] or [S x O]. Second, subject-object oriented pps can happen only with symmetric prepositional phrases. Third, verbs of judgement and verbs of psych can be combined with only subject-oriented locative pps. Forth, All locative alternation verbs have only object-orientation. Fifth, argument orientation mostly combines with stative prepositional phrases and shows high frequency of [O] and [S + O] in a general way. Also we can identify some characteristics of argument orientation through the text analysis. First, showing high frequency of agentive verbs and non-abentive verbs is common to all gradable textbooks in a distribution of combination with types of verbs and prepositional phrases. Second, [S] and [S x O] appear more in the high level textbooks than lower level textbooks. Third, all four patterns of argument orientation show much higher frequency in the middle textbooks over all.
      In conclusion, higher frequency of all four argument orientation patterns shows not in the high textbooks but in middle school textbooks over all. The reason is that there are a lot more visible, physical and specific words in the lower level textbooks than high level textbooks, but on the other hand there are much more abstractive and non-objective words in the high school textbook. Also the reason for the highest appearance of [O] among the four patterns might be explained as "Iconicity of Language", that is, locative phrases are closer to object argument than subject argument. Therefore, locative pps affect more the meaning of object than subject.
      It might be helpful for English learners when they translate English text into Korean. This text analysis can be practical application as a good material to help them understand English easier.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 제 1장 서론 1
      • 제 2장 처소 표현의 논항 지향성 4
      • 2.1 논항 지향성의 정의 및 유형 4
      • 2.2 동사의 유형과 논항 지향성 15
      • 제 1장 서론 1
      • 제 2장 처소 표현의 논항 지향성 4
      • 2.1 논항 지향성의 정의 및 유형 4
      • 2.2 동사의 유형과 논항 지향성 15
      • 2.3 동사의 의미적 자질과 논항 지향성 31
      • 제 3장 논항 지향성의 텍스트 분석 43
      • 3.1 코퍼스 언어학 43
      • 3.2 연구대상과 자료 분석 방법 45
      • 3.3 연구 분석 결과 및 논의 49
      • 제 4장 요약 및 결론 65
      • 참고문헌 68
      • 부록 72
      • 영문초록 76
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼