RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    한․영 지리교과서에 나타난 다문화교육 내용 분석 : 인구 관련 단원을 중심으로 = Analysis of Multicultural Education Content in Geography Textbooks of Korea and Great Britain - With focus on the unit on population

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T12517370

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Through the development of transportation and telecommunications, twenty-first century Korean society has been growing increasingly diverse ethnically, racially, culturally, religiously, and in language. A multicultural society is appearing. The increase in foreign workers, international marriage migrants, foreign students, including naturalized foreigners has changed Korean society from something that was often called single nation-state to a multicultural society. In this multicultural society, the visions and values ​​of multicultural education are growing increasingly important.
    Geography education allows students to explore the racial, cultural and political diversity within human society. Thus geography’s core curriculum has a key role to play in multicultural education. Similarly, geography should be concerned with including multicultural education within its curriculum. This relationship between geography and multicultural education is especially vital now within South Korea for the formation of a multicultural society.
    This study compares and analyzes national geography curricula and textbooks from South Korea and the United Kingdom. It focuses on sections dealing with population that describe the multicultural population of the textbooks’ respective countries. Britain and South Korea have different historical, cultural, political, and social factors, so a direct comparison has limitations. Unlike South Korea, Britain experienced the growth of a multicultural society ahead of the development of its multicultural education. Thus an understanding of UK geographic education and its implications for society can be helpful for the development of a multicultural vision within South Korea’s geography curriculum.
    The results of this study of the relationship between geography education and multicultural education are as follows:
    First, certain standards and actions are required to appropriately achieve a multicultural education curriculum in within geography education. Multicultural education should be required as part of the geography curriculum. Then all geography textbooks will be required to address multiculturalism as part of the unit on population. This requirement will close the learning gap between students who use textbooks that address multiculturalism and those that do not.
    Second, sub-topics of migration, the impact of migration, and population transfers are included in the United Kingdom’s geography textbooks. These sub-sections should be required as part of South Korean textbooks, as well, because they allow students to learn more about the background and demographic characteristics that have creating their multicultural society. In addition, adding a greater variety supplementary boxes that provide material for activities, discussions, and critical thinking will help students more effectively learn about and understand their multicultural society.
    Finally, the geography curriculum of South Korea can develop a more positive orientation toward multicultural issues. In the UK, emphasis is typically on ‘positive’ issues such as diversity, race, ethnicity, and identity, while the more common emphases for South Korean textbooks include conflicts, prejudice, discrimination, and inequality. This new orientation will give students a stronger vision on how different groups can live harmoniously with each other. Thus the textbooks will provide a more balanced view of multicultural society and will allow for people migrating into and within South Korean society to do soon a more positive basis.
    번역하기

    Through the development of transportation and telecommunications, twenty-first century Korean society has been growing increasingly diverse ethnically, racially, culturally, religiously, and in language. A multicultural society is appearing. The incre...

    Through the development of transportation and telecommunications, twenty-first century Korean society has been growing increasingly diverse ethnically, racially, culturally, religiously, and in language. A multicultural society is appearing. The increase in foreign workers, international marriage migrants, foreign students, including naturalized foreigners has changed Korean society from something that was often called single nation-state to a multicultural society. In this multicultural society, the visions and values ​​of multicultural education are growing increasingly important.
    Geography education allows students to explore the racial, cultural and political diversity within human society. Thus geography’s core curriculum has a key role to play in multicultural education. Similarly, geography should be concerned with including multicultural education within its curriculum. This relationship between geography and multicultural education is especially vital now within South Korea for the formation of a multicultural society.
    This study compares and analyzes national geography curricula and textbooks from South Korea and the United Kingdom. It focuses on sections dealing with population that describe the multicultural population of the textbooks’ respective countries. Britain and South Korea have different historical, cultural, political, and social factors, so a direct comparison has limitations. Unlike South Korea, Britain experienced the growth of a multicultural society ahead of the development of its multicultural education. Thus an understanding of UK geographic education and its implications for society can be helpful for the development of a multicultural vision within South Korea’s geography curriculum.
    The results of this study of the relationship between geography education and multicultural education are as follows:
    First, certain standards and actions are required to appropriately achieve a multicultural education curriculum in within geography education. Multicultural education should be required as part of the geography curriculum. Then all geography textbooks will be required to address multiculturalism as part of the unit on population. This requirement will close the learning gap between students who use textbooks that address multiculturalism and those that do not.
    Second, sub-topics of migration, the impact of migration, and population transfers are included in the United Kingdom’s geography textbooks. These sub-sections should be required as part of South Korean textbooks, as well, because they allow students to learn more about the background and demographic characteristics that have creating their multicultural society. In addition, adding a greater variety supplementary boxes that provide material for activities, discussions, and critical thinking will help students more effectively learn about and understand their multicultural society.
    Finally, the geography curriculum of South Korea can develop a more positive orientation toward multicultural issues. In the UK, emphasis is typically on ‘positive’ issues such as diversity, race, ethnicity, and identity, while the more common emphases for South Korean textbooks include conflicts, prejudice, discrimination, and inequality. This new orientation will give students a stronger vision on how different groups can live harmoniously with each other. Thus the textbooks will provide a more balanced view of multicultural society and will allow for people migrating into and within South Korean society to do soon a more positive basis.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서 론 1
    • 1. 연구 목적 1
    • 2. 연구 방법 3
    • 3. 선행 연구 6
    • Ⅱ. 지리교육과 다문화교육 9
    • Ⅰ. 서 론 1
    • 1. 연구 목적 1
    • 2. 연구 방법 3
    • 3. 선행 연구 6
    • Ⅱ. 지리교육과 다문화교육 9
    • 1. 다문화사회와 다문화교육 9
    • 2. 지리교육과 다문화교육 21
    • 3. 한국과 영국의 다문화교육 현황 22
    • Ⅲ. 한국과 영국 지리교육과정의 다문화교육 26
    • 1. 한국 지리교육과정의 다문화교육 26
    • 2. 영국 지리교육과정의 다문화교육 34
    • Ⅳ. 한국과 영국 지리교과서의 다문화교육 내용 비교분석 40
    • 1. 한국과 영국 지리교과서의 다문화교육 내용 분석 40
    • 2. 한국 지리교과서의 인구 단원 다문화교육 내용 분석 48
    • 3. 영국 국가 지리교과서의 다문화교육 내용 분석 92
    • 4. 한국과 영국 지리교과서의 다문화교육 내용 비교분석 105
    • Ⅴ. 요약 및 결론 115
    • [참고문헌] 120
    • [ABSTRACT] 125
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼