검사직무대리제도의 현황과 문제점에 대한 검토 = The Present State and Legal Problem of Probational Prosecutor System

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The Supreme Public Prosecutor’s Office introduced probational prosecutor system at 2001, Sep. 1, and expanded this system all over the country at 2005, Feb. Probational prosecutor’s main duty is prosecution about minor criminal case. In spite of it's importance in the criminal justice system, there are very few studies about probational prosecutor system up the present. So, this study would focus on the whys of it’s introduction, legal basis, present state and problems.
A law about probational prosecutor system has existed since the liberation of Korea, but had been a law that had become a dead letter until a recent date. However it was recently raised as a solution to the problem that the lack of prosecutors caused, namely excessive work. In the end it began at 2001, Sep. 1.
Probational prosecutors has their own office room and they are aided by assigned detectives as prosecutors, but they can’t command a judicial police officer to investigate a criminal case, also they can’t request warrant.
Prosecution is essentially authority of prosecutor. Term 3, Clause 12 of the constitution regulate ‘only prosecutor can request warrant to the court’. If so, it correspond to the spirit of the constitution for only prosecutor, not probational prosecutor, having authority of prosecution, because authority of prosecution is more intrinsic prosecutor’s duty and authority than requesting warrant.
Probational prosecutor system exists on the unreasonable premise that prosecutors have to conduct only major criminal case. Eventually, prosecutors in Korea have excessive influence beyond the law and system. Abolition of Probational prosecutor system is one method for reformation of the prosecution, because it would correct prosecutor’s excessive power and status.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 들어가며
• Ⅱ. 검사직무대리 제도의 연혁 및 현황
• Ⅲ. 독일의 구검사제와 일본의 부검사제·검찰관사무취급검찰사무관
• Ⅳ. 검사직무대리의 권한과 그 한계
• Ⅴ. 검사직무대리제도의 문제점
• Ⅵ. 결론

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이재상, "형사소송법" 박영사 2012

2 강동욱, "헌법재판소의 결정이 검사기소권 등에 미친 영향* - 지난 20년간의 헌법재판소 결정례를 중심으로 -" 한국법정책학회 8 (8): 349-365, 2008

3 위재민, "일본법무성실무수습기(하)" 1995

4 대검찰청 검찰21세기연구기획단, "일본검찰청법 축조해설"

5 김현숙, "수사기관에서 직무대리의 권한 - 검찰청법 제32조의 검사직무대리를 중심으로 -" 한국경찰법학회 8 (8): 100-121, 2010

6 김승현, "부검사제도에 관한 연구 : 도입의 필요성과 기대효과를 중심으로" 동국대학교 대학원 2005

7 김인회, "문재인, 김인회의 검찰을 생각한다" 오월의 봄 2011

8 박노섭, "독일형사소송법" 박영사 2009

9 손동권, "경죄처벌절차의 최근 입법동향에 관한 고찰" 한국공안행정학회 22 (22): 15-40, 2006

10 정영덕, "경죄사건의 신속처리를 위한 검사직무대리제도의 개선방안" 안암법학회 (36) : 269-306, 2011

11 유상진, "경죄사건 신속처리를 위한 부검사제도 도입방안에 관한 연구" 연세대학교 법무대학원 2007

12 조병윤, "경미사건의 간이처리절차에 관한 비교법적 연구-독일․일본의 구검찰청 제도를 중심으로" 법무부 2000

13 신동운, "경미범죄의 효율적 처리방안 -경미사건 처리절차의 재정비를 촉구하면서-" 한국형사정책학회 15 (15):

14 법무연수원, "2009년도 제9기 검사직무대리과정"