RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      統一以後 南·北韓 地方行政의 統合方案 = (A) Strategies for the integration of South & North Korean local administration after Korean unification

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T9646349

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      In the governmental setting of the 1960s-1970s, the policy role of bureaucrats was exceptionally dominant over the interest aggregation of organized political forces. Bureaucratic policy-making was too strongly advocated to argue against its prevalent role images.
      Korea now has the opportunity to match its socioeconomic progress with great politice-administrative reforms. If it succeeds in establishing a better administrative apparatus, it will have laid the foundation not only for enduring democratic progress but also for enduring economic prosperity. And administrative reforms should be directed to deregulation, decentralization, popular participation, and more openness in the government, shifting from bureaucratic authoritarianism to democratic autonomy.
      Anticipating the structural-functional changes of the government, a more adequate institutional framework should be grounded on establishing a new tradition of peaceful political leadership succession, increasing citizen participation, revitalizing local autonomy, realigning governmental roles, and strengthening law and order.
      Under upper background, this study was written. This study on the integration of south & north korean local administration which is focused on situations after korean unification are summarized as follows.
      In the beginning, I exhibited the object, the range, the way on this study.
      As theoretical background, first of all, I defined local administration. And I examined principal and direction of local administration integration. In this sector, several situations are examined; Administration ideology of korean after unification, political, economical, social consolidation situations, etc. And then, I listed integration theory which is related administration systems.
      To explain efficiency Local administration systems, it is necessary to examin Germany's example. Therefore, this, I examined East Germany and West Germany's Administration systems, integration process, and it's suggestion.
      To compare with South Korean Local Administration and North Korean's, I examined precedent studies and used secondary data which is related local administration system.
      Firstly, I examined local administration of South Korea and North Korea. And I compared with their systems.
      Secondly, I examined local administration area and class of South Korean and North Korea. And I compared with their area and class.
      Thirdly, I examined personnel management of public servant of South Korea and North Korea.
      From the analysis, I suggested stratigies for the Integration of South & North Korean Local Administration After Korean Unificationlocal. These are as follows :
      Firstly, I suggested to reorganization method of local administration organization.; general case, reorganization method of local administration organization, and early unification case, gradual progress case.
      Secondly, I suggested to unification methods of administrative area and class.
      Thirdly, I suggested to personnel management of local administration.; necessary personnel of North Korea area, dispatch of public servant of South Korean in North Korea Area, personnel management of public servant of North Korean.
      As a conclusion, I exhibited the conclusion on this study. And I sumarized this study.
      번역하기

      In the governmental setting of the 1960s-1970s, the policy role of bureaucrats was exceptionally dominant over the interest aggregation of organized political forces. Bureaucratic policy-making was too strongly advocated to argue against its prevalent...

      In the governmental setting of the 1960s-1970s, the policy role of bureaucrats was exceptionally dominant over the interest aggregation of organized political forces. Bureaucratic policy-making was too strongly advocated to argue against its prevalent role images.
      Korea now has the opportunity to match its socioeconomic progress with great politice-administrative reforms. If it succeeds in establishing a better administrative apparatus, it will have laid the foundation not only for enduring democratic progress but also for enduring economic prosperity. And administrative reforms should be directed to deregulation, decentralization, popular participation, and more openness in the government, shifting from bureaucratic authoritarianism to democratic autonomy.
      Anticipating the structural-functional changes of the government, a more adequate institutional framework should be grounded on establishing a new tradition of peaceful political leadership succession, increasing citizen participation, revitalizing local autonomy, realigning governmental roles, and strengthening law and order.
      Under upper background, this study was written. This study on the integration of south & north korean local administration which is focused on situations after korean unification are summarized as follows.
      In the beginning, I exhibited the object, the range, the way on this study.
      As theoretical background, first of all, I defined local administration. And I examined principal and direction of local administration integration. In this sector, several situations are examined; Administration ideology of korean after unification, political, economical, social consolidation situations, etc. And then, I listed integration theory which is related administration systems.
      To explain efficiency Local administration systems, it is necessary to examin Germany's example. Therefore, this, I examined East Germany and West Germany's Administration systems, integration process, and it's suggestion.
      To compare with South Korean Local Administration and North Korean's, I examined precedent studies and used secondary data which is related local administration system.
      Firstly, I examined local administration of South Korea and North Korea. And I compared with their systems.
      Secondly, I examined local administration area and class of South Korean and North Korea. And I compared with their area and class.
      Thirdly, I examined personnel management of public servant of South Korea and North Korea.
      From the analysis, I suggested stratigies for the Integration of South & North Korean Local Administration After Korean Unificationlocal. These are as follows :
      Firstly, I suggested to reorganization method of local administration organization.; general case, reorganization method of local administration organization, and early unification case, gradual progress case.
      Secondly, I suggested to unification methods of administrative area and class.
      Thirdly, I suggested to personnel management of local administration.; necessary personnel of North Korea area, dispatch of public servant of South Korean in North Korea Area, personnel management of public servant of North Korean.
      As a conclusion, I exhibited the conclusion on this study. And I sumarized this study.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 目次 = i
      • 제1장 序論 = 1
      • 제1절 硏究의 目的 = 1
      • 제2절 硏究의 範圍와 方法 = 3
      • 제2장 地方行政과 行政統合의 理論的 背景 = 5
      • 目次 = i
      • 제1장 序論 = 1
      • 제1절 硏究의 目的 = 1
      • 제2절 硏究의 範圍와 方法 = 3
      • 제2장 地方行政과 行政統合의 理論的 背景 = 5
      • 제1절 地方行政의 意義 = 5
      • 1. 地方行政의 槪念 = 5
      • 2. 地方行政階層과 地方行政區域 = 9
      • 제2절 地方行政統合의 原則과 方向 = 13
      • 1. 統一韓國의 行政理念 = 13
      • 2. 政治·經濟·社會的 統合環境 = 15
      • 3. 行政需要와 行政統合 = 18
      • 제3절 行政體制의 統合理論 = 22
      • 1. 統合의 槪念과 統合理論 = 22
      • 2. 體制統合의 類型 = 28
      • 3. 地方行政體制의 統合 = 35
      • 제4절 分斷國 行政統合 事例 : 獨逸 = 37
      • 1. 東·西獨 行政組織의一般的인 特徵 = 37
      • 2. 東西獨의 行政 統合過程 = 41
      • 3. 獨逸統一의 行政統合 示唆點 = 46
      • 제5절 分析의 틀 = 48
      • 제3장 南·北韓의 地方行政體制 比較 = 51
      • 제1절 南北韓 地方行政 體制 比較 = 51
      • 1. 南韓 地方行政 體制 = 51
      • 2. 北韓 地方行政 體制 = 54
      • 3. 南北韓 地方行政 體制 比較 = 60
      • 제2절 南北韓 地方行政區域 및 階層 比較 = 65
      • 1. 南漢의 地方行政區域 및 階層 = 65
      • 2. 北韓의 地方行政區域 및 階層 = 65
      • 3. 南北韓 地方行政區域 및 階層 比較 = 66
      • 제3절 地方公務員의 人力管理 比較 = 71
      • 1. 南韓의 地方行政 人力管理 = 71
      • 2. 北韓의 地方行政 人力管理 = 75
      • 3. 南北 人事制度 比較 = 83
      • 제4장 統一韓國의 地方行政 統合方案 = 85
      • 제1절 地方行政組織 改編方案 = 85
      • 1. 地方行政組織 改編方案 = 85
      • 2. 早期統一의 경우 地方行政統合方案 = 86
      • 3. 漸進的 統一의 경우 地方行政統合方案 = 87
      • 제2절 行政區域 및 階層制 統合方案 = 89
      • 1. 行政階層 改編方案 = 89
      • 2. 行政區域 改編方案 = 92
      • 제3절 地方行政의 人力調整方案 = 94
      • 1. 北韓 地域 地方行政官僚 需給展望 = 94
      • 2. 南韓의 統一行政要員 北韓 地方行政 配置 = 96
      • 3. 北韓地方行政 人力의 處理 = 98
      • 제5장 結論 = 103
      • 참고문헌 = 107
      • ABSTRACT = 112
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼