19세기 수렴청정의 공과 사 = Public and Private Aspects of Regency by the Queen Mother in the 19th Century

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Women of the Joseon Dynasty era took the role of maintaining families under the influence of Neo-Confucianism and the Principle of Making a Distinction between Man and Wife. Home, which was a ‘private" space in the spatial aspect, was their sphere of activity. However, when a woman of nobility married a king, that home became part of the royal family and the country. Activities, as well as private spaces of the queen, although not entirely and unconditionally, essentially became ‘public.’
A Queen would make a contribution by assisting her husband in governing the country. And in some cases, the authority of regency was given to the queen mother when a young king came to throne. Regency by the Queen Mother became a device for taking a grand royal queen dowager out to the public sphere of managing a country. As a result, a grand royal queen dowager could perform the ‘public" role, which she already had during her days as queen, now in public space. The legalization of this was the enactment of a "Subdivision of Regency by the Queen Mother." This was a detailed enforcement regulation which constituted a foundation for performing her duties as ‘public matters" of a Grand Royal Queen Dowager.
Nevertheless, regency by the queen mother not only had ‘public" elements. As we can see, family members of the grand royal queen dowager were appointed to important seats, and monopolized authority. Regency by the queen mother had room for ‘private matters" in actual operation. Therefore, official participation in politics without this aspect was hard to expect. This became a problem for management of regency by the queen mother.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 머리말
• 1. 대왕대비 지위의 공·사
• 2. 수렴청정의 공적 요소
• 3. 수렴청정 시행에서 공·사 혼재
• 맺음말
• 참고문헌

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 임혜련, "한국사에서 攝政·垂簾聽政權의 변화 양상" 한국사상문화학회 (62) : 173-200, 2012

2 임혜련, "철종대 정국과 권력 집중 양상－임술민란 배경과 관련하여－" 고려사학회 (49) : 121-158, 2012

3 미조구치 유조, "중국의 공과 사" 신서원 2004

4 이상화, "중국의 가부장제와 공·사 영역에 관한 고찰" 14·15 : 1998

5 권향숙, "주희(朱熹)의 公과 私―講口雄三의 주희 公·私관 비판적 검토" 30 : 2002

6 김정신, "조선전기 사림의 ‘공’ 인식과 군신공치론" 21 : 2000

7 김지영, "조선시대 嗣位儀禮에 대한 연구" 조선시대사학회 (61) : 5-41, 2012

8 황금중, "유교적공공성과 타자" 혜안 2014

9 이순구, "우리 여성의 역사" 청년사 1999

10 이근호, "영조대 均役法 시행과 公․私 논의" 대동문화연구원 (76) : 53-78, 2011

11 이승희, "순원왕후의 한글편지" 푸른역사 2010

12 한지희, "숙종 초 ‘紅袖의 變’과 明聖王后 金氏의 정치적 역할" 31 : 2008

13 허라금, "서구 정치사상에서의 公私념과 가부장적 성차별성" 13 : 1996

14 최석만, "공公과 사私― 유교와 서구 근대 사상의 생활 영역 비교" 동양사회사상학회 5 : 5-22, 2002

15 李在喆, "英祖代 次對의 傾向과 性格" 34 : 2005

16 김동욱, "朝鮮時代 昌德宮 熙政堂의 便殿 轉用에 대하여" 5 : 1994

17 장영기, "朝鮮時代 宮闕 便殿의 성격과 체제변화" 조선시대사학회 (48) : 5-37, 2009

18 임혜련, "憲宗初 純元王后 垂簾聽政期의 官人 임용 양상과 權力 關係" 호서사학회 (66) : 209-240, 2013

19 임혜련, "哲宗初 純元王后 垂簾聽政期의 官人 임용 양상과 權力關係" 한국사학회 (110) : 285-326, 2013

20 임혜련, "19세기 수렴청정 연구" 숙명여자대학교 2008