원간섭기 토지분급제도의 양상과 특징 = Aspects and Characteristics of the Land Distribution System during the Period of Control of Yuan(元) Dynasty

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study was written to analyze the aspects of the land distribution system in the late Goryeo period, especially during the Yuan Intervention period. To this end, first of all, it was reviewed whether the Jeonsigwa(田柴科) system, the land distribution system of the early Goryeo period, was maintained even during the Yuan Intervention period. The Jeonsigwa(田柴科) system was a system in which land was provided according to ranks, from bureaucrats to military officers. For this reason, the provided land usually is divided into two types: land given to nobles and land given to military officers. Since Nokgwajeon and Sageupjeon during the Yuan Intervention period were mainly paid to bureaucrats, this study is limited to the Yangban Jeonsigwa.
It was understood that the Yangban Jeonsigwa was not paid to bureaucrats during the Yuan intervention period for three main reasons. First, after the Jeonsigwa System was enacted, there was a case in which the Royal Court paid an additional lands when the nobleman's rank was raised due to a celebration in the country. In 1153 (the 7th year of King Uijong), Uijong, who installed his son Wang Hong as the crown prince, added lands to bureaucrats. In the message after his accession to the throne, Shin Jong added ranks and lands to bureaucrats. However, after this case, it is difficult to find a case in which paid for the lands in the 『Goryeosa』 Second, in the reign of King Chungmok, reform of the land system in the Yuan Intervention period is required. The request for reform of the land system was well reflected in the writing posted by Lee Jehyeon to the Dodang(都堂), and in the first year of King Chungmok, Dopyeonguisasa tried to reform the Nokgwajeon and Sageupjeon systems. By the way, Lee Jehyeon put the reform plan of the land distribution system, which was paid to the entire Goryeo Dynasty, especially to bureaucrats, on the restoration of Nogwahyeon. Lee Jehyeon, who had a good understanding of Goryeo's land system, took the restoration of Nokgwajeon as a reform plan because the Jeonsigwa was virtually collapsed and could not be restored.
Third, Jo Jun named the Nokgwajeonsi while submit a written opinion for reform of land’s system. Jo Jun named it Nokgwajeonsi because the Yangban Jeonsigwa had already disappeared and Nokgwajeon had replaced it.
King Chungnyeol moved to the Yuan after taking power, drove out some collaborators such as Hong Dagu, and then strengthened the royal authority. During this process, King Chungnyeol revised the Nokgwajeon system, and the revised Nokgwajeon at this time was aimed at providing fertile land to his favorite ministers or newly appointed Bichikchi officials. However, those close to him were worried that their Sapaejeon would be distributed as Nokgwajeon because they had already received the fertile land of the Gyeonggi through Sapaejeon. In response, King Chungnyeol takes measures to prevent the payment of land paid for Sapaejeon to Nokgwajeon.
From this time on, Sapaejeon, which was occupied by the close associates, came into conflict with the Nokgwajeon system. As King Chungnyeol's reign grew longer, the politics of his close associates were strengthened, and in the process of confrontation with his son King Chungseon over the throne, the politics of close associate were structured into a new political form in Goryeo. Of course, the Sapaejeon was further expanded. To make matters worse, those who enjoyed power as the close associates began to seize the land around Sapaejeon, but the target of sequestration was not just the land of the people. Officials' land was also subject to deprivation, and Sapaejeon became a major source of infringement on Nokgwajeon. As a result, whenever ...

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이경식, "한국중세토지제도사" 서울대학교 출판부 2011

2 이우성, "한국중세사회연구" 일조각 1997

3 신은제, "통치제도로서의 토지분급제와 그 변화 －전시과를 중심으로－" 한국중세사학회 (61) : 73-108, 2020

4 강순길, "충숙왕대의 찰리변위도감에 대하여" 15 : 1985

5 김형수, "충숙왕 12년(1325)교서의 재검토" 24 : 2001

6 김형수, "충선왕의 복위와 복위교서의 성격" 56 : 1998

7 김형수, "책문을 통해 본 이제현의 현실인식" 13 : 2002

8 이경식, "조선전기토지제도연구" 일조각 1986

9 백남운, "조선봉건사회경제사 상" 이론과 실천 1993

10 민현구, "정치도감의 성격" 1980

11 민현구, "정치도감의 설치경위" 11 : 1977

12 "익제난고"

13 신은제, "원종 12년 祿科田 분급의 배경과 그 의미" 부산경남사학회 (110) : 221-255, 2019

14 "원사"

15 박종기, "원간섭기 사회현실과 개혁론의 전개" 한국역사연구회 (49) : 67-97, 2003

16 김광철, "원간섭기 고려의 측근정치와 개혁정치" 경인문화사 2018

17 이익주, "공민왕대 개혁의 추이와 신흥유신의 등장" 15 : 1995

18 이정훈, "고려후기 必闍赤의 설치와 그 변화" 한국사학회 (132) : 345-382, 2018

19 강진철, "고려토지제도사연구" 일조각 1997

20 이경식, "고려전기의 전시과" 서울대학교출판부 2007

21 김기섭, "고려전기 정전제 연구" 부산대학교 1993

22 윤한택, "고려전기 사전연구" 고려대학교출판부 1995

23 민현구, "고려의 녹과전" 53·54 : 1972

24 李相國, "고려시대 양반전 分給의 一樣相" 한국사연구회 (128) : 71-102, 2005

25 박종진, "고려시기 재정운영과 조세제도" 서울대학교 출판부 2000

26 "고려사절요"

27 "고려사"

28 김기섭, "고려말 사전구폐론자의 전시과 인식과 그 한계" 127 : 1990

29 신은제, "고려말 ‘私田’ 담론의 정치적 구성" 한국중세사학회 (40) : 299-340, 2014

30 권선우, "고려 충렬왕대 김방경 무고사건의 전개와 그 성격" 5 : 1999

31 오치훈, "고려 전시과의 분급체계와 운영" 고려대학교 2018

32 김기섭, "고려 녹과전제의 시행과 분급방식의 변화" 효원사학회 60 : 123-162, 2021

33 李淑京, "高麗後期 賜牌田 硏究" 西江大學校 大學院 1997

34 李益柱, "高麗·元關係의 構造와 高麗後期 政治體制" 서울大學校 大學院 1996

35 권용철, "大元帝國 末期 政局과 고려 충혜왕의 즉위, 복위, 폐위" 고려사학회 (56) : 65-107, 2014

36 김광철, "14세기초 원의 정국동향과 충선왕의 토번유배" 3 : 1996

37 신은제, "14세기 전반 원의 정국동향과 고려의 정치도감" 한국중세사학회 (26) : 191-231, 2009

38 김혜원, "14세기 고려의 정치와 사회" 1994