RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    영조대 均役海稅의 수취와 상납 — 『輿地圖書』의 집계 분석 = Understanding Sea Tax after the Establishment of Kyunyŏkpŏp by Analyzing Yŏji Tosŏ

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104077210

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper attempts to aggregate the total amount of sea tax during the King Yŏngjo era, especially 10 years after the enforcement of Kyunyŏkpŏp. Sea tax was composed of fishery tax, saltern tax, boat tax, and so forth. Fishery tax was imposed on fishing equipment, such as fishing net, fish pound, fish weir, and fish garth. Saltern tax was levied on several kinds of brine pans. Boat tax was enforced on each boat, ship, or vessel.
    The main results of the analysis are as follows. First, the value of Yŏji Tosŏ as a source of information or statistics is higher than we expected. Second, the actual situation of collecting sea tax at that time demonstrates the formalism of the state finance during the late Chosŏn dynasty. Third, there was no downfall of collected volume of sea tax after King Chŏngjo’s reign because the amount of actual sea tax had been very stable at the level of 80,000 yang since Kyunyŏkpŏp was established. Finally, boat tax was the largest among several tax items, including fishery tax, saltern tax, and seaweed tax.
    Understanding the sea tax system and the actual taxation policy in the 18th century encourages us to conduct an additional empirical analysis of that in the 19th century. From a long-term perspective, we will be able to identify the trend of the state finance during the late Chosŏn dynasty.
    번역하기

    This paper attempts to aggregate the total amount of sea tax during the King Yŏngjo era, especially 10 years after the enforcement of Kyunyŏkpŏp. Sea tax was composed of fishery tax, saltern tax, boat tax, and so forth. Fishery tax was imposed on f...

    This paper attempts to aggregate the total amount of sea tax during the King Yŏngjo era, especially 10 years after the enforcement of Kyunyŏkpŏp. Sea tax was composed of fishery tax, saltern tax, boat tax, and so forth. Fishery tax was imposed on fishing equipment, such as fishing net, fish pound, fish weir, and fish garth. Saltern tax was levied on several kinds of brine pans. Boat tax was enforced on each boat, ship, or vessel.
    The main results of the analysis are as follows. First, the value of Yŏji Tosŏ as a source of information or statistics is higher than we expected. Second, the actual situation of collecting sea tax at that time demonstrates the formalism of the state finance during the late Chosŏn dynasty. Third, there was no downfall of collected volume of sea tax after King Chŏngjo’s reign because the amount of actual sea tax had been very stable at the level of 80,000 yang since Kyunyŏkpŏp was established. Finally, boat tax was the largest among several tax items, including fishery tax, saltern tax, and seaweed tax.
    Understanding the sea tax system and the actual taxation policy in the 18th century encourages us to conduct an additional empirical analysis of that in the 19th century. From a long-term perspective, we will be able to identify the trend of the state finance during the late Chosŏn dynasty.

    더보기

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper attempts to aggregate the total amount of sea tax during the King Yŏngjo era, especially 10 years after the enforcement of Kyunyŏkpŏp. Sea tax was composed of fishery tax, saltern tax, boat tax, and so forth. Fishery tax was imposed on fishing equipment, such as fishing net, fish pound, fish weir, and fish garth. Saltern tax was levied on several kinds of brine pans. Boat tax was enforced on each boat, ship, or vessel.
    The main results of the analysis are as follows. First, the value of Yŏji Tosŏ as a source of information or statistics is higher than we expected. Second, the actual situation of collecting sea tax at that time demonstrates the formalism of the state finance during the late Chosŏn dynasty. Third, there was no downfall of collected volume of sea tax after King Chŏngjo’s reign because the amount of actual sea tax had been very stable at the level of 80,000 yang since Kyunyŏkpŏp was established. Finally, boat tax was the largest among several tax items, including fishery tax, saltern tax, and seaweed tax.
    Understanding the sea tax system and the actual taxation policy in the 18th century encourages us to conduct an additional empirical analysis of that in the 19th century. From a long-term perspective, we will be able to identify the trend of the state finance during the late Chosŏn dynasty.
    번역하기

    This paper attempts to aggregate the total amount of sea tax during the King Yŏngjo era, especially 10 years after the enforcement of Kyunyŏkpŏp. Sea tax was composed of fishery tax, saltern tax, boat tax, and so forth. Fishery tax was imposed on f...

    This paper attempts to aggregate the total amount of sea tax during the King Yŏngjo era, especially 10 years after the enforcement of Kyunyŏkpŏp. Sea tax was composed of fishery tax, saltern tax, boat tax, and so forth. Fishery tax was imposed on fishing equipment, such as fishing net, fish pound, fish weir, and fish garth. Saltern tax was levied on several kinds of brine pans. Boat tax was enforced on each boat, ship, or vessel.
    The main results of the analysis are as follows. First, the value of Yŏji Tosŏ as a source of information or statistics is higher than we expected. Second, the actual situation of collecting sea tax at that time demonstrates the formalism of the state finance during the late Chosŏn dynasty. Third, there was no downfall of collected volume of sea tax after King Chŏngjo’s reign because the amount of actual sea tax had been very stable at the level of 80,000 yang since Kyunyŏkpŏp was established. Finally, boat tax was the largest among several tax items, including fishery tax, saltern tax, and seaweed tax.
    Understanding the sea tax system and the actual taxation policy in the 18th century encourages us to conduct an additional empirical analysis of that in the 19th century. From a long-term perspective, we will be able to identify the trend of the state finance during the late Chosŏn dynasty.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 黃夏鉉, "良役의 實相과 均役法의 實施" 3 : 71-72, 1979

    2 이영학, "조선후기 어세 정책의 추이" 12 (12): 225-228, 2000

    3 김선경, "조선후기 山林川澤 私占에 관한 연구" 경희대학교 1999

    4 조영준, "조선후기 ‘雜稅’ 연구의 현황과 과제" 규장각한국학연구원 (36) : 51-72, 2010

    5 鄭演植, "조선후기 ‘役摠’의 운영과 良役變通" 서울大學校 1993

    6 변주승, "조선후기 '輿地圖書'의 성격과 인천 지역의 특성" 6 : 216-, 2007

    7 이철성, "조선후기 '輿地圖書'에 나타난 인천 지역의 田結稅와 漕運路 연구" 6 : 275-278, 2007

    8 "영조실록"

    9 "승정원일기"

    10 박기주, "선혜청의 수입과 지출" 서울학연구소 (32) : 73-109, 2008

    1 黃夏鉉, "良役의 實相과 均役法의 實施" 3 : 71-72, 1979

    2 이영학, "조선후기 어세 정책의 추이" 12 (12): 225-228, 2000

    3 김선경, "조선후기 山林川澤 私占에 관한 연구" 경희대학교 1999

    4 조영준, "조선후기 ‘雜稅’ 연구의 현황과 과제" 규장각한국학연구원 (36) : 51-72, 2010

    5 鄭演植, "조선후기 ‘役摠’의 운영과 良役變通" 서울大學校 1993

    6 변주승, "조선후기 '輿地圖書'의 성격과 인천 지역의 특성" 6 : 216-, 2007

    7 이철성, "조선후기 '輿地圖書'에 나타난 인천 지역의 田結稅와 漕運路 연구" 6 : 275-278, 2007

    8 "영조실록"

    9 "승정원일기"

    10 박기주, "선혜청의 수입과 지출" 서울학연구소 (32) : 73-109, 2008

    11 "비변사등록"

    12 "균역청사목"

    13 정연식, "균역법의 시행과 그 의미" 국사편찬위원회 32 : 156-200, 1997

    14 김우철, "균역법은 왜 성공하지 못했나" 8 : 130-, 2002

    15 朴九秉, "韓國漁業史" 正音社 1975

    16 崔承熙, "海稅制度와 그 實際. in: 韓國水産史" 水産廳 1968

    17 西田信治, "李朝軍役體制の解體" 21 : 131-160, 1984

    18 須川英德, "李朝商業政策史研究 : 十八·十九世紀における公権力と商業" 東京大學出版會 1994

    19 麻生武龜, "朝鮮財政史. in: 朝鮮史講座: 分類史"

    20 金玉根, "朝鮮王朝財政史硏究[II]" 一潮閣 1987

    21 金玉根, "朝鮮王朝財政史硏究(八) : 漁稅制度" 1 : 1974

    22 金鎭鳳, "朝鮮時代 軍役資源의 變動에 대한 硏究 : 湖西地方의 경우를 中心으로" 3 : 55-113, 1983

    23 李旭, "朝鮮後期 魚鹽政策 硏究" 高麗大學校 2002

    24 서울大學校奎章閣, "奎章閣韓國本圖書解題Ⅶ(史部4)"

    25 車文燮, "壬亂以後의 良役과 均役法의 成立" 11 : 145-146, 1961

    26 이욱, "均役法을 통해 본 18세기 朝鮮의 商業課稅政策" 86 : 1999

    27 鄭演植, "均役法 施行 이후의 지방재정의 변화" 67 : 32-, 1989

    28 金友哲, "均役法 施行 前後의 私募屬 硏究" 4 : 114-, 1991

    29 이철성, "『輿地圖書』에 나타난 田結稅 항목의 텍스트적 이해" 고려사학회 (25) : 531-571, 2006

    30 조영준, "19-20세기 보부상 조직에 대한 재평가 ―元洪州六郡商務右社를 중심으로―" 경제사학회 47 : 39-77, 2009

    31 金鉉丘, "18·9세기 巨濟府의 海稅運營과 民庫" 19 : 454-, 1995

    32 鄭演植, "17·18세기 良役均一化政策의 推移" 13 : 180-181, 1985

    33 鄭演植, "17·18세기 평안도 良役制의 변천" 27 : 197-199, 2001

    34 金義煥, "17·18世紀 鹽稅政策의 變動 : 均役法 給代財源과 關聯하여" 6 : 99-158, 1998

    35 "'정조실록' 1784년 2월 25일"

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-05-23 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국문화연구소 -> 규장각한국학연구원
    영문명 : Institute of Korean Studies -> Kyujanggak Institute for Korean Studies
    KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.83 0.83 0.82
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.85 0.85 2.07 0.37
    더보기
    해외이동버튼