RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    생략을 통한 정태보어구문의 사건의 활성화 고찰 = A Study on the Activation of the Affair in the State Complement sentences through Ellipsis

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108650304

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In this study, the activation of affairs in state complementary phrases from the perspective of omission was considered, and the information structure of the verb predicate in the sentence was identified. Information structure is expressed lexically or grammatically evoked in sentences, and static verb phrases were analyzed as the result of information restructuring to focus static phrases following the '得(de)'. Therefore, when a verb with a direct object is used as a predicate, it is structured as a 'subject+V1+object+V2+得+static verb phrase', and V1 is not a simple verb, but rather an 'affair' and has an activation state of 'accessible', and functions as a topic. On the other hand, V2 is 'active' because already being 'accessible' affair is mentioned again, and it is analyzed that it functions as a topic-focus with the function of [+contrast] which represents this behavior, not any other behavior in the affair.
    In the case of predicates that do not have an object, it was structured as 'subject+V1+得+static verb', and the subject referent was symbolized as a pronoun, so it showed the highest 'active' state. In addition, it was considered that the referent corresponding to the subject can be omitted in the sentence, so it functions as a 'topic' by satisfying the ellipsis licensing approval of omission. On the other hand, V1 is text-externally 'accessible', it has high tendency of being a topic, but it does not function as the topic because the ellipsis licensing are not met. Therefore it was analyzed as a 'topic-focus' with the nature of [+ contrast, - prominence].
    번역하기

    In this study, the activation of affairs in state complementary phrases from the perspective of omission was considered, and the information structure of the verb predicate in the sentence was identified. Information structure is expressed lexically o...

    In this study, the activation of affairs in state complementary phrases from the perspective of omission was considered, and the information structure of the verb predicate in the sentence was identified. Information structure is expressed lexically or grammatically evoked in sentences, and static verb phrases were analyzed as the result of information restructuring to focus static phrases following the '得(de)'. Therefore, when a verb with a direct object is used as a predicate, it is structured as a 'subject+V1+object+V2+得+static verb phrase', and V1 is not a simple verb, but rather an 'affair' and has an activation state of 'accessible', and functions as a topic. On the other hand, V2 is 'active' because already being 'accessible' affair is mentioned again, and it is analyzed that it functions as a topic-focus with the function of [+contrast] which represents this behavior, not any other behavior in the affair.
    In the case of predicates that do not have an object, it was structured as 'subject+V1+得+static verb', and the subject referent was symbolized as a pronoun, so it showed the highest 'active' state. In addition, it was considered that the referent corresponding to the subject can be omitted in the sentence, so it functions as a 'topic' by satisfying the ellipsis licensing approval of omission. On the other hand, V1 is text-externally 'accessible', it has high tendency of being a topic, but it does not function as the topic because the ellipsis licensing are not met. Therefore it was analyzed as a 'topic-focus' with the nature of [+ contrast, - prominence].

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 박청희, "현대 국어의 생략 현상 연구" 고려대학교 대학원 2013

    2 강연임, "한국어 담화와 생략" 이회문화사 2005

    3 이슬기, "중국어 명사술어문과 계사 생략의 인가조건" 한국중어중문학회 (78) : 165-202, 2019

    4 Knud, Lambrecht, "정보 구조와 문장 형식" 월인 2000

    5 정희자, "담화와 문법" 한신문화사 1999

    6 구현철, "담화구조적 생략현상" 49 : 301-310, 1996

    7 呂冀平, "當前漢語規範工作中的幾個問題" (2) : 81-90, 1985

    8 鄧守信, "現代漢語語法講義" 書林出版有限公司 2022

    9 서진현, "現代漢語焦點敏感詞硏究-制限性副詞와 語氣性副詞를 중심으로-" 전북대학교 대학원 2018

    10 劉丹青, "焦點與背景、話題及漢語“連”字句" 2 (2): 243-252, 1998

    1 박청희, "현대 국어의 생략 현상 연구" 고려대학교 대학원 2013

    2 강연임, "한국어 담화와 생략" 이회문화사 2005

    3 이슬기, "중국어 명사술어문과 계사 생략의 인가조건" 한국중어중문학회 (78) : 165-202, 2019

    4 Knud, Lambrecht, "정보 구조와 문장 형식" 월인 2000

    5 정희자, "담화와 문법" 한신문화사 1999

    6 구현철, "담화구조적 생략현상" 49 : 301-310, 1996

    7 呂冀平, "當前漢語規範工作中的幾個問題" (2) : 81-90, 1985

    8 鄧守信, "現代漢語語法講義" 書林出版有限公司 2022

    9 서진현, "現代漢語焦點敏感詞硏究-制限性副詞와 語氣性副詞를 중심으로-" 전북대학교 대학원 2018

    10 劉丹青, "焦點與背景、話題及漢語“連”字句" 2 (2): 243-252, 1998

    11 Charles N. Li, "漢語語法" 文鶴 2008

    12 曹逢甫, "主題在漢語中的功能研究" 語文出版社 1986

    13 沈家煊, "不對稱和標記論" 江西教育出版社 1998

    14 Chafe, Wallace, "Subject and Topic" Academic Press 27-55, 1976

    15 Firbas, J., "Non-thematic subjects in contemporary English" 2 : 239-256, 1957

    16 Beaugrande, R. de, "Introduction to Text Linguistics" Longman 1981

    17 Knud, Lambrecht, "Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, andthe Mental Representations of Discourse Referents" Cambridge University Press 1994

    18 Kuno, Susumu, "Functional Syntax: Anaphora, Discourse and Empathy" The University of Chicago Press 1987

    19 Chomsky, N, "Deep structure, Surface structure, and semantic interpretation, Semantics" Cambridge University Press 1971

    20 Lakoff, G, "Deep and surface grammar"

    21 Halliday, M. A. K., "Cohesion in English" Longman 1976

    22 Chafe, Wallace, "Coherence and Grounding in Discourse" John Benjamins Publishing Company 21-52, 1987

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼