RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      From public drive to citizen initiate : planning in Seattle's Pioneer Square Historic District from 1990s to 2010s

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T13573120

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Designation of historic district in urban core helps to conserve physical heritages of city but it does not help to preserve livability of community in the area. To solve social problems and to pursue better neighborhood, local governments have attempted various community development policies. Along increasing interest in public participation policies, this study focuses on participants, initiative, and components of public participated plans
      The Pioneer Square Historic District in Seattle was designated as the first historic district in the city in 1970. The historic district has been recognized as an exemplary historic districts in the United States. The City of Seattle has applied various programs and plans which influence the Pioneer Square Historic District in many ways. In 1990, Washington Stated Legislature enacted Growth Management Act and in the same year the City of Seattle created the Department of Neighborhood. With those two appliances, the Pioneer Square Planning Committee approved Pioneer Square Neighborhood Plan 1998 and a decade later, in 2010, Pioneer Square 2015: A Strategy for Seattle’s First Neighborhood was adopted. In this study application of these two plan in the Pioneer Square Historic District is compared and is analyzed. Documents from Seattle City Archive were reviewed with other literatures about the 1998 Plan and the 2015 Strategy as well as other community development policies and historic preservation policies.
      From 1950s to 1980s, the Federal government led historic preservation and community development with abundant amount of funding. After the 1980s, autonomy of State and local governments grew and initiative changed from the federal to local.
      Among various similarities between two plans, there are noticeable changes. First, the initiative stakeholder changes from government to citizen. Both plans are known for bottom-up plan making process. However, the 1998 plan was derived by the Growth Management Act and its derivate plans – King County Countywide Policies, Seattle Comprehensive Plans and others, so community members were ‘participated’ in the process not leading the plan. The 2015 Strategy was initiated by community organizations in the Pioneer Square Historic District. The members of organizations initiated the plan and proposed the plan to the City of Seattle. Second, the contents change from result focused to processes oriented. Components in the 1998 plan does not have much space for community to participate. Mostly the City government projects oriented. However, a big portion of contents of the 2015 Strategy is community meetings among them or with government agencies. Third, the portion of physical components is decreased while the non-physical components are increased. In the 1998, infrastructure and environment improvement projects, and maintenance related elements are the major issues. In 2015, the focus shifted to economy, marketing, image and neighborhoods. For the last, the relation among other programs and department are more emphasized and improved.
      The significant of this study is traced changes in between two neighborhood plans in Pioneer Square Historic District. Through this change, the change in value among people and growth of community power can be analogized. However, this study could not clearly identify reasons of these changes as well as evaluating two plans.
      번역하기

      Designation of historic district in urban core helps to conserve physical heritages of city but it does not help to preserve livability of community in the area. To solve social problems and to pursue better neighborhood, local governments have attemp...

      Designation of historic district in urban core helps to conserve physical heritages of city but it does not help to preserve livability of community in the area. To solve social problems and to pursue better neighborhood, local governments have attempted various community development policies. Along increasing interest in public participation policies, this study focuses on participants, initiative, and components of public participated plans
      The Pioneer Square Historic District in Seattle was designated as the first historic district in the city in 1970. The historic district has been recognized as an exemplary historic districts in the United States. The City of Seattle has applied various programs and plans which influence the Pioneer Square Historic District in many ways. In 1990, Washington Stated Legislature enacted Growth Management Act and in the same year the City of Seattle created the Department of Neighborhood. With those two appliances, the Pioneer Square Planning Committee approved Pioneer Square Neighborhood Plan 1998 and a decade later, in 2010, Pioneer Square 2015: A Strategy for Seattle’s First Neighborhood was adopted. In this study application of these two plan in the Pioneer Square Historic District is compared and is analyzed. Documents from Seattle City Archive were reviewed with other literatures about the 1998 Plan and the 2015 Strategy as well as other community development policies and historic preservation policies.
      From 1950s to 1980s, the Federal government led historic preservation and community development with abundant amount of funding. After the 1980s, autonomy of State and local governments grew and initiative changed from the federal to local.
      Among various similarities between two plans, there are noticeable changes. First, the initiative stakeholder changes from government to citizen. Both plans are known for bottom-up plan making process. However, the 1998 plan was derived by the Growth Management Act and its derivate plans – King County Countywide Policies, Seattle Comprehensive Plans and others, so community members were ‘participated’ in the process not leading the plan. The 2015 Strategy was initiated by community organizations in the Pioneer Square Historic District. The members of organizations initiated the plan and proposed the plan to the City of Seattle. Second, the contents change from result focused to processes oriented. Components in the 1998 plan does not have much space for community to participate. Mostly the City government projects oriented. However, a big portion of contents of the 2015 Strategy is community meetings among them or with government agencies. Third, the portion of physical components is decreased while the non-physical components are increased. In the 1998, infrastructure and environment improvement projects, and maintenance related elements are the major issues. In 2015, the focus shifted to economy, marketing, image and neighborhoods. For the last, the relation among other programs and department are more emphasized and improved.
      The significant of this study is traced changes in between two neighborhood plans in Pioneer Square Historic District. Through this change, the change in value among people and growth of community power can be analogized. However, this study could not clearly identify reasons of these changes as well as evaluating two plans.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • CHAPTER 1: Introduction
      • 1.1 Background
      • 1.2 Goals and Objectives
      • 1.3 Methods
      • 1.4 Chapter Organization
      • CHAPTER 1: Introduction
      • 1.1 Background
      • 1.2 Goals and Objectives
      • 1.3 Methods
      • 1.4 Chapter Organization
      • CHAPTER 2: Literature Review
      • 2.1 Historic Preservation
      • 2.2 Community Development and Neighborhood Planning
      • 2.3 Related Policies in Seattle
      • CHAPTER 3: Policies for Historic Presesrvation in Seattle and Pioneer Square Historic District Designation (1950s to 1980s)
      • 3.1 Development of Historic Preservation Policies
      • 3.2 Community Development Programs
      • 3.3 Impacts on Local Planning
      • CHAPTER 4: Local Policies for Pioneer Square Historic District (1990s to 2010s)
      • 4.1 Washington State Growth Management Act 1990
      • 4.2 Development of Neighborhood Plans in Seattle
      • 4.3 Pioneer Square Historic District Plans
      • 4.4 Chapter Conclusion
      • CHAPTER 5: Research Analysis and Findings
      • 5.1. From Public Drive to Citizen Initiate
      • 5.2 From Product-Focused to Process Oriented
      • 5.3 From Physical Issues to Economic and Marketing Issues
      • 5.4 Integration in Local Neighborhood Planning
      • CHAPTER 6: Conclusion
      • Bibliography
      • APPENDIX 1: Neighborhood Matching Fund Projects in Pioneer Square neighborhood (1989-2013)
      • APPENDIX 2: Pioneer Square 2015 Strategy projects list (2010-2013)
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼