1. Definition, Stankowsky, , 1978
2. Hereditary genius, Galton, , 1869
3. Cradles of eminence, Goertzel, Victor, Little, Brown, , 1962
4. Children over 180 IQ, Hollingworth, , 1942
5. 창의성에의 초대, 임선하, 敎保文庫, , 1993
6. Growing up gifted(6-th), Clark, , 2002
7. Mathematical Creativity, Ervynck, Mathematical creativity, , 1991
8. Teaching gifted children, Gallagher, , 1985
9. 제3차 대통령 보고서, 교육개혁위원회, , 1996
10. Talented children and adults, Piirto, , 1994
11. Designing a global curriculum, Passow, , 1989
12. Toward a theory of creativity, Rogers, , 1954
13. Qualitative evaluation methods, Patton, Michael Quinn, Sage Publications, Qualitative evaluation methods, , 1980
14. A case study of twin gifted boys, Witty, Coomer, , 1955
15. Science Talent: The elusive gift, Bluton, , 1983
16. 영재교육의 이론과 실제, 이해명, 敎育科學社, , 1986
17. Developing talent in young people, Bloom, Benjamin Samuel, Ballantine Books, Developing talent in young people, , 1985
18. 창의성- 요소적 접근 모델, Klaus K, 조석희, Urban, , 1996
19. The meaning and making of giftedness, Tannenbaum, , 1997
20. 수학 영재교육에 대한 고찰, 남승인, , 1996
21. Degrees of freedom and the case study, Campbell, , 1979
22. Composotion research: Empiricaldesigns, Asher, Lauer, , 1988
23. Family therapy andqualitative research, Sprenkle, Dillon, Moon, , 1990
24. Case study research: Design and methods, Yin, Sage Publications, Case study research: Design and methods, , 2003
25. The gifted in socioeducational perspective, Newland, T. Ernest, Prentice-Hall, , 1976
26. An educational history of the Western World, Meyer, Adolphe Erich, McGraw-Hill, , 1965
27. Intellectual giftedness in disabled persons, Whitmore, Joanne Rand, Aspen Systems Corp., , 1985
28. 미국의 영재교육 실태 조사 연구, 김수환, 한국수학교육학회, "한국수학교육학술지 시리즈 F, , 2000
29. The nature and nurture of creative potential, MacKinnon, , 1962
30. Radical acceleration in Australia: Terence Tao, Gross, , 1986
31. Various approaches to definition of creativity, Taylor, , 1988
32. (한국의 새천년을 위한)영재 교육학, 전경원, 학문사, 한국의 새천년을 위한 영재 교육학, , 2000
33. Programs and strategies for nurturing creativity, Treffinger, Cross, , 1993
34. The Richardson study: Results and recommendations, Cox, , 1986
35. Education in Japan: A century of moderndevelopment, Anderson, , 1975
36. Toward a differentiated model of gifted and talent, Gagn, , 1991
37. Identifying and nurturing the intellectually gifted, Stanley, , 1978
38. 2003년 영재교육기관별 기관수 및 학생수, 박현경, , 2005
39. Frames of mind : the theory of multiple intelligences, Gardner, Howard, BasicBooks, Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences,
40. Pre-Sputnik to post-Watergate concern about thegifted, Tannenbaum, , 1979
41. Toward a new paradigm for identifying talent potential, Frasier, M. M., , 1994
42. Aspect of mathematical creativity in children aged11-12, Haylock, , 1984
43. Talent identification and development ineducation(TIDE), Feldhusen, , 1992
44. The Autonomous Learner Model for the Gifted andTalented, Betts, , 1991
45. New directions in the guidance of thegifted and talented, Perrone, Pulvino, , 1979
46. 영재를 위한 수학과 교육과정의 시안 개발, 석용징(Yong-Jing Suk), 신현성(Hyun-Sung Shin), 대한수학교육학회, "대한수학교육학회 논문집, , 1992
47. Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research, Goetz, Judith Preissle, Academic Press, Ethnography and qualitative designin educational research, , 1984
48. Gifted children: Psychological and educational perspective, Tannenbaum, Gifted children: Psychological and educationalperspective, , 1983
49. The psychology of mathematics abilities in school children, Krutetskii, , 1976
50. 수학 영재의 판별 절차 및 기준에 관한 연구, 서정표, 한국교원대학교, , 1994
51. Guiding the social and emotional development of gifted youth, Delisle, J. R., , 1992
52. Some facts and ideas about talented genius in Chinesehistory, Tsuin-chen, , 1961
53. 영재성의 측정 및 영재 선발 방안에 관한 연구, 임선하, 임이내, 신세호, , 1984
54. Constructs and models pertaining to exceptional human abilities, Gagn, , 1993
55. Beyond talent: John Irving and the passionate craft ofcreativity, Amabile, , 2001
56. Individual differences increativity-An interactionist perspestive, Woodman, Schoenfeld, , 1989
57. Curriculum development and teaching strategies for gifted learners, Maker, C. June, Pro-Ed, , 1996
58. The role of creativity in identification of the giftedand talented, Torrance, , 1984
59. Quasi-experimentation: Designs andanalysis issues for field settings, Cook, Campbell, , 1979
60. Characteristics and special needs of the gifted students inmathematics, Heid, , 1983
61. The discovery of grounded theory : strategies for qualitative research, Glaser, Barney G, Aldine de Gruyter, The discovery of grounded theory:Strategies for qualitative research, , 1999
62. 數學的 能力의 構造에 따른 數學 英才兒의 指導 方案, 강완(Kang Wan), 대한수학교육학회, , 1994
63. Nature’s gambit: Child prodigesand the development of human potential, Feldman, Goldsmith, , 1986
64. Giftedness as potential for creativeproductivity: Transcending IQ scores, Treffinger, Renzulli, , 1986
65. Thinking and problem solving: Handbook ofperception and cognition(2nd ed), Sternberg, , 1994
66. The development of an instrument to measure creativityability in mathematics, Balka, , 1974
67. Torrance test of creativethinking: Streamlined scoring guide figural A and B, Ball, Safer.T, Torrance, , 1992
68. The schoolwide enrichment model: A comprehensive plan for education excellence, Renzulli, Reis, The schoolwide enrichment model: Acomprehensive plan for education excellence, , 1985
69. A study of selected factor to identify sixthgrade students gifted in mathematics, Derrider, , 1986
70. Genetic studies of genius: The early mental traits ofthree hundred geniuses(Vol 2), Cox, , 1926
71. The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model forcreative productivity, Renzulli, , 1986
72. Learning to learn: What the science of thinking andlearning has to offer adult education, Cromley, , 2000
73. The enrichment triad model: A guide for developingdefensible for the gifted and talented, Renzulli, , 1977
74. 수학 영재교육 프로그램을 위한 수학적 영재성의 정의와 판별의이론적 고찰, 송상헌(Song Sang-hun), 대한수학교육학회, , 1996
75. Problem solving and creativity: Multiple solutionmethods in a cross-cultural in middle level mathematics, Fouche, , 1993
76. The applications of single subject research methods to thestudy of exceptional ability and extraordinary achievement, Foster, , 1986
77. Measuring the ability of students to respond tocreative mathematical situations at the late elementary and earlyjunior high school level, Evans, , 1964