RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    産學協力 硏究成果의 影響要因 分析 : 大學의 硏究機能을 중심으로 = Assessing the impact factors on the performance of university-industry research collaboration : focusing on the research function of universities

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T10235506

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      서울 : 성균관대학교, 2005

    • 학위논문사항

      학위논문(박사) -- 성균관대학교 일반대학원 , 2004

    • 발행연도

      2005

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • 주제어
    • DDC

      351 판사항(22)

    • 발행국(도시)

      서울

    • 형태사항

      ⅶ, 260 p. : 삽도 ; 26 cm.

    • 일반주기명

      부록: 1. 산학협력연구실태조사서, 2. 심층설문조사서, 3. 기술이전현황조사표, 4. 기술이전│사업화 통계조사표, 5. 산학협력 실태조사표.
      참고문헌: p. 213-226

    • DOI식별코드
    • 소장기관
      • 국립중앙도서관 국립중앙도서관 우편복사 서비스
      • 성균관대학교 중앙학술정보관 소장기관정보
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In recent years, universities have rapidly escalated their involvement in technology transfer. Accelerated in part by external expectations for economic development as well as internal pressures to generate new sources of revenue, this emergent commercialization mission for higher education is serving to transform higher education in substantive ways.
    In many respects, recent S&T policy trends support both the idea of national innovation system(NIS) composed of multiple actors in constant interaction and the hypothesis of an emerging new system of knowledge production, characterized by greater heterogeneity in scientific research and a growing affiliation between university researchers and extra-university partners.
    In this regards, I would operationally define the notion of university-industry research collaboration (UIRC) in this study to include as possible as many types of cooperative research projects, like product development supported by academia or government, cooperative research for product development, basic research supported by companies and cooperative projects in basic research. Moreover, I see to it that performances of UIRC include R&D work forces, master theses and doctoral dissertations, student interns, consultations, patents, know-hows, university start-ups, licenses and royalties.
    The purpose of this study is to identify the influential factors on the performances of university-industry research collaboration, and to assess the impact of the factors on the academical, technological and commercial outputs of UIRC in the Republic of Korea. For this purpose, I present quantitative and qualitative evidences on the impact factors and output factors of UIRC.
    Based on a survey of 107 universities, I conclude that critical influential factors on the academic performances of UIRC are intellectual eminences and sizes of universities, that the ages of TTO influence the technological performances of UIRC, and that the university policies like the distribution of royalty rates between inventors and the university influence commercial performances of UIRC.
    This research also represents the most influential factors on 8 kinds of substantial outputs of sub-groups of universities, like national universities vs. private universities, universities located in Seoul Metropolitan Area vs. universities located in non Seoul Metropolitan Area, and research oriented universities vs. education oriented universities. For example, the royalty rates influence the licensing revenues of national research universities whereas R&D expenditures influence the licensing revenues of research universities located in non Seoul Metropolitan Area.
    The results of 38 in-depth interviews of university TTO directors shows that most of them remarked license and royalty, patents and intellectual property as the significant output of university-industry technology transfer(UITT), and that the barriers to UITT procedure are lack of expertise of university TTO staffs, insufficient compensation for faculty members and inconsistent evaluation system of university technologies. TTO directors also suggest that establishment of UITT system, staffing of UITT experts and technology financing systems for university technology based start-ups are important to enhance the UITT procedures in Korea.
    In short, this study suggests that the government and the universities should find ways to establish and support the university TTOs and to improve the faculty reward systems to promote the performances of UIRC and to enhance the UITT procedures in Korea.
    번역하기

    In recent years, universities have rapidly escalated their involvement in technology transfer. Accelerated in part by external expectations for economic development as well as internal pressures to generate new sources of revenue, this emergent commer...

    In recent years, universities have rapidly escalated their involvement in technology transfer. Accelerated in part by external expectations for economic development as well as internal pressures to generate new sources of revenue, this emergent commercialization mission for higher education is serving to transform higher education in substantive ways.
    In many respects, recent S&T policy trends support both the idea of national innovation system(NIS) composed of multiple actors in constant interaction and the hypothesis of an emerging new system of knowledge production, characterized by greater heterogeneity in scientific research and a growing affiliation between university researchers and extra-university partners.
    In this regards, I would operationally define the notion of university-industry research collaboration (UIRC) in this study to include as possible as many types of cooperative research projects, like product development supported by academia or government, cooperative research for product development, basic research supported by companies and cooperative projects in basic research. Moreover, I see to it that performances of UIRC include R&D work forces, master theses and doctoral dissertations, student interns, consultations, patents, know-hows, university start-ups, licenses and royalties.
    The purpose of this study is to identify the influential factors on the performances of university-industry research collaboration, and to assess the impact of the factors on the academical, technological and commercial outputs of UIRC in the Republic of Korea. For this purpose, I present quantitative and qualitative evidences on the impact factors and output factors of UIRC.
    Based on a survey of 107 universities, I conclude that critical influential factors on the academic performances of UIRC are intellectual eminences and sizes of universities, that the ages of TTO influence the technological performances of UIRC, and that the university policies like the distribution of royalty rates between inventors and the university influence commercial performances of UIRC.
    This research also represents the most influential factors on 8 kinds of substantial outputs of sub-groups of universities, like national universities vs. private universities, universities located in Seoul Metropolitan Area vs. universities located in non Seoul Metropolitan Area, and research oriented universities vs. education oriented universities. For example, the royalty rates influence the licensing revenues of national research universities whereas R&D expenditures influence the licensing revenues of research universities located in non Seoul Metropolitan Area.
    The results of 38 in-depth interviews of university TTO directors shows that most of them remarked license and royalty, patents and intellectual property as the significant output of university-industry technology transfer(UITT), and that the barriers to UITT procedure are lack of expertise of university TTO staffs, insufficient compensation for faculty members and inconsistent evaluation system of university technologies. TTO directors also suggest that establishment of UITT system, staffing of UITT experts and technology financing systems for university technology based start-ups are important to enhance the UITT procedures in Korea.
    In short, this study suggests that the government and the universities should find ways to establish and support the university TTOs and to improve the faculty reward systems to promote the performances of UIRC and to enhance the UITT procedures in Korea.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 차례
    • 第1章 序論 = 1
    • 第1節 硏究目的 = 1
    • 第2節 硏究範圍와 方法 = 11
    • 第3節 硏究動向 = 14
    • 차례
    • 第1章 序論 = 1
    • 第1節 硏究目的 = 1
    • 第2節 硏究範圍와 方法 = 11
    • 第3節 硏究動向 = 14
    • 第2章 理論的·制度的 背景 = 29
    • 第1節 産學協力 硏究의 性格과 運營 = 29
    • 1. 산학협력 연구의 개념과 유형 = 29
    • 2. 산학협력 연구의 기능과 한계 = 37
    • 3. 산학협력 연구의 갈등과 관리 전략 = 49
    • 4. 산학협력 연구의 협상 = 59
    • 第2節 産學協力 硏究 成果의 測定 = 70
    • 1. 연구성과 측정의 논리 = 70
    • 2. 산학협력 연구의 학술적 성과 = 71
    • 3. 산학협력 연구의 기술적 성과 = 76
    • 4. 산학협력 연구의 경영적 성과 = 80
    • 第3節 産學協力 硏究成果의 影響要因 = 85
    • 1. 연구성과 영향요인의 논리 구조 = 85
    • 2. 산학협력 R&D 투자 요인 = 86
    • 3. 대학의 산학협력 연구 관리 요인 = 87
    • 4. 산학협력 기술 인프라 요인 = 90
    • 第4節 各國의 産學協力 硏究 政策 = 96
    • 1. 우리나라의 산학협력 연구 정책 = 97
    • 2. 歐美의 산학협력 연구 정책 = 99
    • 3. 中日의 산학협력 연구 정책 = 108
    • 第3章 硏究設計 = 114
    • 第1節 分析模型 = 114
    • 1. 분석모형의 구성 = 114
    • 2. 변수의 조작적 정의 = 119
    • 第2節 資料蒐集 = 132
    • 1. 양적자료 = 132
    • 2. 질적자료 = 140
    • 第3節 分析方法 = 143
    • 1. 양적분석 = 143
    • 2. 질적분석 = 145
    • 第4章 産學協力 硏究成果의 實證分析 = 146
    • 第1節 調節變數에 따른 産學協力 影響要因 差異分析 = 148
    • 1. 설립주체별 산학협력 영향요인 차이분석 = 148
    • 2. 소재지별 산학협력 영향요인 차이분석 = 151
    • 3. 대학 특성화 유형별 산학협력 영향요인 차이분석 = 154
    • 第2節 學術的 成果의 影響要因 分析 = 158
    • 1. 산학협력 연구와 논문 실적 = 158
    • 2. 산학협력 연구와 인턴십 실적 = 164
    • 3. 산학협력 연구와 석·박사 배출 = 165
    • 第3節 技術的 成果의 影響要因 分析 = 171
    • 1. 산학협력 연구와 기술자문 실적 = 171
    • 2. 산학협력 연구와 기술보유 실적 = 172
    • 3. 질적분석과 종합적 논의 = 177
    • 第4節 經營的 成果의 影響要因 分析 = 182
    • 1. 산학협력 연구와 창업 실적 = 182
    • 2. 산학협력 연구와 기술이전 실적 = 184
    • 3. 질적분석과 종합적 논의 = 195
    • 第5章 結論 = 201
    • 第1節 硏究 要約 = 201
    • 第2節 政策建議 = 208
    • 第3節 硏究의 限界 = 211
    • 參考 文獻 = 213
    • 附錄 = 227
    • 附錄 1 産學協力硏究 實態調査書 = 227
    • 附錄 2 深層 設問調査書 = 236
    • 附錄 3 기술이전현황 조사표 = 237
    • 附錄 4 기술이전·사업화 통계조사표 = 241
    • 附錄 5 교육인적자원부의 산학협력 실태조사표 (一部 발췌 ) = 245
    • ABSTRACT = 246
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼