RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    정보통신망 이용촉진 및 정보보호 등에 관한 법률상 임시조치제도에 관한 연구 = A study on temporary measures system of "act on promotion of information and communications network utilization and information protection, etc"

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99915785

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper examines the problem of act on promotion of information and communications network utilization and information protection, etc(hereinafter referred to as "the act of information and communications network") particularly of temporary measures system. My aim is to highlight several aspects of protecting the fundamental rights(freedom of expression) on the internet. According to the act of information and communications network "Article 44-2 (1) Where information provided through an information and communications network purposely to make it public intrudes on other person's privacy, defames other persons, or violates other presons' right otherwise, the victim of such violation may request the provider of information and communications services who handled the information to delete the information or publish a rebuttable statement, presenting it materials supporting the alleged violation. (2) A provider of information and communications services shall, upon receving a request for deletion or rebuttal of the information under paragraph (1), delete the information, take a temporary measure, or any other necessary measure, and shall notify the applicant and the publisher of the information immediately. In such cases, the provider of information and communications services shall make it known to users that it has taken necessary measures by posting a public notice on the relevant open message board ir in any other way. (4) A provide of information and communications services may, if it 1s difficult to judge whether information violates any right or it is anticipated that there will probably be a dispute between interested parties, take a measure to block access to the information temporarily, irrespective of a request for deletion of the information under paragraph (1). In such cases, the period of time for the temporary measure shall not exceed 30 days. (5) Every provider of information and communications services shall clearly state the details, procedure, and other matters concerning necessary measures m its standardized agreement in advance. Article 44-3 (1) A provider of information and communications services may, if it finds that information circulated through the information and communications network operated and menaged by it intrudes on someone's privacy, defames someone, or violates someone's rights, take temporary measures at its discertion."

    Internet service providers(ISPs) were granted a temporary measure by the act of information and communications network. But granted a temporary measure in the private sector that is the problem. Because it is apprehended that ISPs could infringe on civil's freedom of expression. Therefore in connection with this issue, I wish to address protecion system of civil's freedom of expression on internet relating to temporary measures of the act of information and communications network. There is solution of above problems to is to grant a public sector(Korea Communication Standards Commission) a temporary measure by the act of information and communications network.
    번역하기

    This paper examines the problem of act on promotion of information and communications network utilization and information protection, etc(hereinafter referred to as "the act of information and communications network") particularly of temporary measure...

    This paper examines the problem of act on promotion of information and communications network utilization and information protection, etc(hereinafter referred to as "the act of information and communications network") particularly of temporary measures system. My aim is to highlight several aspects of protecting the fundamental rights(freedom of expression) on the internet. According to the act of information and communications network "Article 44-2 (1) Where information provided through an information and communications network purposely to make it public intrudes on other person's privacy, defames other persons, or violates other presons' right otherwise, the victim of such violation may request the provider of information and communications services who handled the information to delete the information or publish a rebuttable statement, presenting it materials supporting the alleged violation. (2) A provider of information and communications services shall, upon receving a request for deletion or rebuttal of the information under paragraph (1), delete the information, take a temporary measure, or any other necessary measure, and shall notify the applicant and the publisher of the information immediately. In such cases, the provider of information and communications services shall make it known to users that it has taken necessary measures by posting a public notice on the relevant open message board ir in any other way. (4) A provide of information and communications services may, if it 1s difficult to judge whether information violates any right or it is anticipated that there will probably be a dispute between interested parties, take a measure to block access to the information temporarily, irrespective of a request for deletion of the information under paragraph (1). In such cases, the period of time for the temporary measure shall not exceed 30 days. (5) Every provider of information and communications services shall clearly state the details, procedure, and other matters concerning necessary measures m its standardized agreement in advance. Article 44-3 (1) A provider of information and communications services may, if it finds that information circulated through the information and communications network operated and menaged by it intrudes on someone's privacy, defames someone, or violates someone's rights, take temporary measures at its discertion."

    Internet service providers(ISPs) were granted a temporary measure by the act of information and communications network. But granted a temporary measure in the private sector that is the problem. Because it is apprehended that ISPs could infringe on civil's freedom of expression. Therefore in connection with this issue, I wish to address protecion system of civil's freedom of expression on internet relating to temporary measures of the act of information and communications network. There is solution of above problems to is to grant a public sector(Korea Communication Standards Commission) a temporary measure by the act of information and communications network.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
    • Ⅱ. 임시조치제도 개관
    • Ⅲ. 임시조치제도의 법적 문제점 및 개선방안
    • Ⅳ. 맺는 말
    • Abstract
    • Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
    • Ⅱ. 임시조치제도 개관
    • Ⅲ. 임시조치제도의 법적 문제점 및 개선방안
    • Ⅳ. 맺는 말
    • Abstract
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 성낙인, "헌법학" 법문사 518-, 2010

    2 조수혜, "헌법재판에서의 가처분에 대한 비교법적 연구 ― 한국과 미국을 중심으로 ―" 미국헌법학회 23 (23): 307-342, 2012

    3 전광석, "정당해산심판에 대한 헌법적 및 정치적 이해" 한국헌법판례연구학회 13 : 135-, 2012

    4 최종선, "인터넷 內容審議 機構에 關한 硏究" 성균관대학교 법학전문대학원 2013

    5 김학성, "권한쟁의심판의 문제점과 권한쟁의심판과 행정소송과의 관할권 경합" 비교법학연구소 33 : 85-111, 2011

    6 "https://inoti.naver.com/inoti/service.nhn?m=honorRequestOnline"

    7 "http://www.yourrights.co.kr/bbs/?btcode=notice&idx=158"

    8 "http://www.kocsc.or.kr/01_online/community_Useinfo.php"

    9 "http://www.etnews.com/news/special/2493531_1525.html"

    10 "http://www.ebn.co.kr/news/n_view.html?id=635346"

    1 성낙인, "헌법학" 법문사 518-, 2010

    2 조수혜, "헌법재판에서의 가처분에 대한 비교법적 연구 ― 한국과 미국을 중심으로 ―" 미국헌법학회 23 (23): 307-342, 2012

    3 전광석, "정당해산심판에 대한 헌법적 및 정치적 이해" 한국헌법판례연구학회 13 : 135-, 2012

    4 최종선, "인터넷 內容審議 機構에 關한 硏究" 성균관대학교 법학전문대학원 2013

    5 김학성, "권한쟁의심판의 문제점과 권한쟁의심판과 행정소송과의 관할권 경합" 비교법학연구소 33 : 85-111, 2011

    6 "https://inoti.naver.com/inoti/service.nhn?m=honorRequestOnline"

    7 "http://www.yourrights.co.kr/bbs/?btcode=notice&idx=158"

    8 "http://www.kocsc.or.kr/01_online/community_Useinfo.php"

    9 "http://www.etnews.com/news/special/2493531_1525.html"

    10 "http://www.ebn.co.kr/news/n_view.html?id=635346"

    11 "http://likms.assembly.go.kr/bill/jsp/BillDetail.jsp?bill_id=PRC_C0T6C1A2F2M1H1M8Z2G4J3F9X0N5E5"

    12 "http://likms.assembly.go.kr/bill/jsp/BillDetail.jsp?bill_id=002825"

    13 "http://inoti.naver.com/inoti/claim.nhn?m=subject"

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2018-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2017-10-24 학회명변경 한글명 : 법학연구소 -> 법학연구원 KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-10-10 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> SungKyunKwan Law Review KCI등재
    2008-05-13 학회명변경 한글명 : 비교법연구소 -> 법학연구소
    영문명 : Institute for Comparative Legal Studies -> The Institute of Legal Studies
    KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.64 0.64 0.71
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.6 0.57 0.849 0.28
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼