RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    초등학교 영어 교과서 비교 분석 : 5, 6학년 교과서의 내용 영역을 중심으로 = Analysis of elementary school English textbooks : focusing on the contents of 5th and 6th grade textbooks

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T14471478

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      진주 : 진주교육대학교, 2017

    • 학위논문사항

      학위논문(석사) -- 진주교육대학교 교육대학원 , TESOL전공 , 2017

    • 발행연도

      2017

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • KDC

      375.474 판사항(6)

    • DDC

      372.6521 판사항(23)

    • 발행국(도시)

      경상남도

    • 형태사항

      vi, 100장 ; 26 cm

    • 일반주기명

      지도교수: 원명옥
      권말부록: 단원 구성 체계 - 5학년 등
      참고문헌: 장 82-85

    • 소장기관
      • 국립중앙도서관 국립중앙도서관 우편복사 서비스
      • 진주교육대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    국문 초록 (Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    초등영어교육의 목표는 일상생활에서 사용하는 기초적인 영어를 중심으로
    의사소통능력의 바탕을 쌓고자 하며, 내용으로는 영어의 듣기, 말하기, 읽기, 쓰
    기의 네 기능을 점진적으로 함양할 수 있도록 하되 가능한 여러 기능을 통합적
    으로 사용하는 능력을 기르도록 요구하고 있다. 추상적 개념으로서의 교육과정
    이 실제 교육 현장에 적용될 수 있도록 내용화되고, 구체화 된 결과물이 영어
    교과서이다. 따라서 영어교과서가 교육과정 목표를 어떻게 반영하고 있는지를
    살펴보는 것은 교과서 평가와 선택을 위해 반드시 필요한 과제로 여겨진다.
    본 연구는 초등학교 5, 6학년 영어 교과서의 내용 영역을 비교 분석하여 전반
    적인 특성을 밝히고자 한다. 교과서 분석을 위하여 검인정 4종의 5-6학년 8권
    을 선정하여 학년별로 A-D 교과서로 명하였으며, 분석의 초점은 단원구성, 언
    어 기능, 의사소통기능, 어휘, 문법에 두었다. 분석 기준은 2009 개정 초등영어
    과 교육과정의 기준을 중심으로 하되 다른 기준들도 참조하였다. 초등영어교과
    서에 대한 교사들의 인식도 설문조사하였다.
    교과서 분석의 결과는 아래와 같다. 첫째, 출판사별로 5학년과 6학년 교과서 의 단원구성이 거의 동일하였고, 음성언어를 먼저 학습하고 문자언어를 뒤에
    학습하도록 순서화되어 있었다. 둘째, 교과서 A, B는 이해 기능 활동을 더 많
    이 포함하고, C와 D는 표현 기능 활동을 더 많이 포함하고 있다. 셋째, 모든
    교과서에서 듣기, 말하기는 가장 많은 5-7개 차시에 다루어지고, 읽기는 4-5개
    차시에, 쓰기는 2-4개 차시에 다루어지고 있었다. 넷째, 5학년과 6학년 교과서
    에서 다루어지는 의사소통기능은 모두 51-52개에 달하며, A, C, D교과서는
    23-26개의 기능을, B교과서는 33개의 기능을 포함하고 있었다. 다섯째, 신출어
    휘 수의 경우, 교과서 A, C, D(268-274개)는 전반적으로 교육과정의 기준을 따
    르고 있었지만 교과서 B(325개)는 상당히 초과하고 있었다. 여섯째, 모든 5학년
    교과서의 긴 문장들은 평균 6.2개의 단어를 포함하는 반면 6학년은 7.2개의 단
    어로 이루어져 있어 교육과정의 기준을 만족시키고 있었다 일곱째, 차시별 가
    장 긴 문장의 평균길이에서 A와 D교과서는 중간 정도로, B교과서는 가장 긴
    것으로, C교과서가 가장 짧은 것으로 밝혀졌다. 여덟째, 6학년의 모든 교과서가
    평서문, 의문문, 명령문, 청유문, 감탄문의 5종류를 포함하고 있었으며, 부정문
    의 사용 빈도는 높지 않았다. 아홉째, 모든 교과서에 주로 1-3형식의 문장이 사
    용되었고, 4-5형식 문장은 거의 사용되지 않았다. 열 번째, 모든 교과서에 사용
    된 구절동사의 수는 많지 않았으며, 동사의 현재, 과거, 미래 시제가 사용되었
    으나 완료형 시제는 사용되지 않았고, 문법형태소는 습득순서와 학습난이도 순
    서에 전반적으로 부합되게 제시되고 있었다. 마지막으로, 설문조사에 참여한 대
    부분의 초등학교 영어교사들은 교과서 A를 사용하고 있었으며, 사용하는 교과
    서에 대하여 긍정적으로 인식하고 있었다.
    위의 결과들은 초등영어교사들이 다양한 영어 교과서의 특성을 이해하고 교
    수와 학습을 위한 교과서 선택 시 유용한 참고자료가 될 것으로 여겨진다. 또
    한 본 연구는 초등영어 교과서의 내용 영역을 광범위하게 비교 분석하였다는
    점에서 교과서 분석 연구 분야의 발전에 작은 기여를 할 것으로 기대한다.
    번역하기

    초등영어교육의 목표는 일상생활에서 사용하는 기초적인 영어를 중심으로 의사소통능력의 바탕을 쌓고자 하며, 내용으로는 영어의 듣기, 말하기, 읽기, 쓰 기의 네 기능을 점진적으로 함양...

    초등영어교육의 목표는 일상생활에서 사용하는 기초적인 영어를 중심으로
    의사소통능력의 바탕을 쌓고자 하며, 내용으로는 영어의 듣기, 말하기, 읽기, 쓰
    기의 네 기능을 점진적으로 함양할 수 있도록 하되 가능한 여러 기능을 통합적
    으로 사용하는 능력을 기르도록 요구하고 있다. 추상적 개념으로서의 교육과정
    이 실제 교육 현장에 적용될 수 있도록 내용화되고, 구체화 된 결과물이 영어
    교과서이다. 따라서 영어교과서가 교육과정 목표를 어떻게 반영하고 있는지를
    살펴보는 것은 교과서 평가와 선택을 위해 반드시 필요한 과제로 여겨진다.
    본 연구는 초등학교 5, 6학년 영어 교과서의 내용 영역을 비교 분석하여 전반
    적인 특성을 밝히고자 한다. 교과서 분석을 위하여 검인정 4종의 5-6학년 8권
    을 선정하여 학년별로 A-D 교과서로 명하였으며, 분석의 초점은 단원구성, 언
    어 기능, 의사소통기능, 어휘, 문법에 두었다. 분석 기준은 2009 개정 초등영어
    과 교육과정의 기준을 중심으로 하되 다른 기준들도 참조하였다. 초등영어교과
    서에 대한 교사들의 인식도 설문조사하였다.
    교과서 분석의 결과는 아래와 같다. 첫째, 출판사별로 5학년과 6학년 교과서 의 단원구성이 거의 동일하였고, 음성언어를 먼저 학습하고 문자언어를 뒤에
    학습하도록 순서화되어 있었다. 둘째, 교과서 A, B는 이해 기능 활동을 더 많
    이 포함하고, C와 D는 표현 기능 활동을 더 많이 포함하고 있다. 셋째, 모든
    교과서에서 듣기, 말하기는 가장 많은 5-7개 차시에 다루어지고, 읽기는 4-5개
    차시에, 쓰기는 2-4개 차시에 다루어지고 있었다. 넷째, 5학년과 6학년 교과서
    에서 다루어지는 의사소통기능은 모두 51-52개에 달하며, A, C, D교과서는
    23-26개의 기능을, B교과서는 33개의 기능을 포함하고 있었다. 다섯째, 신출어
    휘 수의 경우, 교과서 A, C, D(268-274개)는 전반적으로 교육과정의 기준을 따
    르고 있었지만 교과서 B(325개)는 상당히 초과하고 있었다. 여섯째, 모든 5학년
    교과서의 긴 문장들은 평균 6.2개의 단어를 포함하는 반면 6학년은 7.2개의 단
    어로 이루어져 있어 교육과정의 기준을 만족시키고 있었다 일곱째, 차시별 가
    장 긴 문장의 평균길이에서 A와 D교과서는 중간 정도로, B교과서는 가장 긴
    것으로, C교과서가 가장 짧은 것으로 밝혀졌다. 여덟째, 6학년의 모든 교과서가
    평서문, 의문문, 명령문, 청유문, 감탄문의 5종류를 포함하고 있었으며, 부정문
    의 사용 빈도는 높지 않았다. 아홉째, 모든 교과서에 주로 1-3형식의 문장이 사
    용되었고, 4-5형식 문장은 거의 사용되지 않았다. 열 번째, 모든 교과서에 사용
    된 구절동사의 수는 많지 않았으며, 동사의 현재, 과거, 미래 시제가 사용되었
    으나 완료형 시제는 사용되지 않았고, 문법형태소는 습득순서와 학습난이도 순
    서에 전반적으로 부합되게 제시되고 있었다. 마지막으로, 설문조사에 참여한 대
    부분의 초등학교 영어교사들은 교과서 A를 사용하고 있었으며, 사용하는 교과
    서에 대하여 긍정적으로 인식하고 있었다.
    위의 결과들은 초등영어교사들이 다양한 영어 교과서의 특성을 이해하고 교
    수와 학습을 위한 교과서 선택 시 유용한 참고자료가 될 것으로 여겨진다. 또
    한 본 연구는 초등영어 교과서의 내용 영역을 광범위하게 비교 분석하였다는
    점에서 교과서 분석 연구 분야의 발전에 작은 기여를 할 것으로 기대한다.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 국문초록 ·············································································································· ⅰ
    • I. 서 론 ·················································································································· 1
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 ···································································································· 4
    • 1. 영어 교재와 교과서 ································································································ 4
    • 가. 개념······················································································································ 4
    • 국문초록 ·············································································································· ⅰ
    • I. 서 론 ·················································································································· 1
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 ···································································································· 4
    • 1. 영어 교재와 교과서 ································································································ 4
    • 가. 개념······················································································································ 4
    • 나. 필요성 ·················································································································· 5
    • 2. 교과서 내용의 구성 요소······················································································ 6
    • 가. 언어 기능············································································································ 6
    • 나. 의사소통 능력과 기능······················································································ 7
    • 다. 어휘······················································································································ 9
    • 라. 문법 ·················································································································· 11
    • 3. 선행 연구················································································································ 21
    • Ⅲ. 연구 방법 ······································································································ 24
    • 1. 교과서 선정 ············································································································ 24
    • 2. 교과서 분석 기준 ·································································································· 26
    • 가. 2009 개정 교육과정························································································ 26
    • 나. 이론적 기준 ······································································································ 28
    • 다. 내용 영역 분석 기준······················································································ 29
    • 3. 교사의 인식 조사 ·································································································· 29
    • Ⅳ. 분석 결과 및 논의 ······················································································ 31
    • 1. 단원 구성 ·············································································································· 31
    • 2. 언어 기능 ·············································································································· 33
    • 가. 이해 및 표현 기능·························································································· 33
    • 나. 개별 언어 기능································································································ 35
    • 다. 차시별 언어 기능 ···························································································· 37
    • 3. 의사소통기능 ·········································································································· 39
    • 4. 신출 어휘················································································································ 47
    • 가. 단원별 신출 어휘 ···························································································· 47
    • 나. 내용어와 기능어······························································································ 50
    • 5. 문법·························································································································· 52
    • 가. 문장 길이·········································································································· 52
    • 나. 문장 유형·········································································································· 58
    • 다. 문장 형식·········································································································· 62
    • 라. 구절 동사·········································································································· 68
    • 마. 동사 시제·········································································································· 69
    • 바. 문법 형태소 ······································································································ 70
    • 6. 교사의 인식 조사 ·································································································· 71
    • 7. 요약 ························································································································ 73
    • V. 결론 및 제언 ································································································· 79
    • 참고 문헌 ············································································································· 82
    • Abstract ················································································································ 86
    • 부 록 ··············································································································· 89
    • 1. 단원 구성 체계 - 5학년 ················································································ 90
    • 2. 의사소통기능 - 5학년·························································································· 91
    • 3. 단원별 신출 어휘 - 5학년·················································································· 93
    • 4. 3형식 문장·············································································································· 95
    • 5. 문법 형태소 제시 순서 조사 예시 ···································································· 98
    • 6. 설문지 ···················································································································· 100
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼