計劃制限과 損失補償에 關한 硏究 : 土地利用計劃을 中心으로

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In modern Constitutional states, the absoluteness of private property was acknowledged, end the individual's right to property was understood as a sacred, God-given, inalienable, and inviolate right. In present age, however, the absoluteness of the right to property is no longer acknowledged, and a social and communal character of the right to property are asked, it is permitted to restriction of the right to property by communal needs. That is to say, the state may expropriate, use, or restrict privately owned property for the benefit of society or the people, this phenomenon is constantly increasing as the scope of state activities widens.
Particularly, the restriction to the land property right came to intervene positively in real estate to promote the increasing of public welfare in living space with the utility use of land by a means of civil rights, since the administration process was recognized as a national obligation.
An article which is in the 3rd clause of 23 article in Korean "the expropriation use or restriction and it's compensation of property rights done by Public necessity should be treated with law, and a lawful compensation of should be given", so the restriction for public use originated from public necessity is ruled and at the same time loss compensation to the restriction is ruled. But each individual law(the law of national land use, the law of urban planning) includes the restriction rule in them, however they don't have any compensation rule, so the planning infringement is recognized as a social restriction in reality, the problem of compensation is occurred when the loss from restriction is reached the 'specific sacrifice', a cause of loss compensation, which exists above the range of social restriction.
Therefore this paper considers the planning control with an emphasis on land use planning. and present improvement provision on loss compensation with discriminating between 'social restriction' and 'specific sacrifice'.
Summerizing the contents of this paper orderly, the introduction present the purpose, the methods and the extant of studying.
In chapter 2, the concept, the basis and the contents of planning control and the land use planning are considered, and the meaning, restriction, the legal nature, the nature of public welfare of land use planning, and it's legal limits according to the essential attributes of property rights are studied.
In chapter 3. the theory of compensation explains the meaning of loss compensation and it's justification for existence and the nature of compensation claim, the basis of compensation and the discriminative standards between 'social restriction' and 'Specific sacrifice' are discussed.
In chapter 4, the partial loss compensation problems which appear in planning effectuation process and the loss compensation rule in the current law of land expropriation and a formal objection to it's disobedience are discussed.
In conclusion, this paper is closed with the presentation of improvement provision on planing control for public welfare and loss compensation securing the private ownership to the property right through the above discussion.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 目次
• 第1章 序論 = 1
• I. 硏究의 目的 = 1
• II. 硏究의 範圍와 方法 = 2
• 第2章 計劃制限과 土地利用計劃 = 4
• 第1節 計劃制限 = 4
• I. 計劃制限의 槪念 = 4
• 1. 意義 = 4
• 2. 行政計劃과 計劃制限 = 4
• II. 計劃制限의 根據 = 5
• 1. 憲法上의 規定 = 5
• 2. 土地利用에 관한 規定 = 6
• 1) 土地利用制限에 관한 規定 = 6
• 2) 土地開發制限에 관한 規定 = 6
• 3) 土地處分制限에 관한 規定 = 7
• III. 計劃制限의 內容 = 7
• 1. 國土利用計劃上의 制限 = 7
• 1) 行爲 制限 = 8
• 2) 用途地域管理의 義務 = 9
• 2. 都市計劃法上의 制限 = 9
• 第2節 土地利用計劃 = 10
• I. 土地利用計劃의 槪念 = 10
• 1. 意義 = 10
• 2. 土地利用計劃制限 = 11
• II. 土地利用計劃의 法的 性質 = 12
• 1. 計劃의 行爲形式 = 12
• 1) 學說 = 12
• 2) 判例 = 14
• 2. 計劃의 特性 = 14
• III. 土地利用計劃의 法的限界 = 15
• 1. 計劃의 公益性 = 15
• 2. 財産權 保障의 核으로서의 本質的 內容 = 16
• 第3章 損失補償理論 = 19
• 第1節 損失補償의 槪念 = 19
• I. 損失補償의 意義 = 19
• II. 損失補償의 存在理由 = 20
• 1. 財産權의 保障 = 20
• 2. 平等負擔의 原則 = 21
• III. 損失補償請求權의 性質 = 21
• 1. 公權說 = 21
• 2. 社權說 = 22
• 3. 社會權說 = 22
• 4. 結語 = 23
• 第2節 損失補償의 根據 = 23
• I. 理論的 根據 = 23
• 1. 旣得權說 = 23
• 2. 恩蕙說 = 24
• 3. 公用徵收說 = 24
• 4. 特別犧牲說 = 25
• 5. 平等負擔說 = 25
• 6. 財産權保障說 = 25
• 7. 生活權保障說 = 26
• 8. 結語 = 26
• Ⅱ. 實定法的 根據 = 26
• 1. 立法指針說 = 27
• 2. 違憲無效說 = 27
• 3. 直接效力說 = 27
• 4. 結語 = 29
• 第3節 社會的 制約과 特別한 犧牲의 區別 = 29
• I. 形式的基準說 = 30
• II. 實質的 基準說 = 31
• 1. 受忍限度說 = 31
• 2. 保護價値說 = 31
• 3. 私的效用說 = 32
• 4. 目的違背說 = 32
• 5. 社會的制約說 = 32
• 6. 狀況拘束性說 = 33
• III. 結語 = 33
• 提4節 損失補償 理論의 擴大 = 34
• I. 收用類似侵害의 法理 = 34
• 1. 收用類似侵害의 意義 = 34
• 2. 構成要件 = 35
• II. 收用的 侵害로의 擴大 = 35
• 第4章 計劃法上 規定된 補償問題 = 37
• 第1節 補償을 要하는 計劃制限 = 37
• I. 計劃의 不適合으로 인한 損失 = 37
• II. 計劃의 實施遲延으로 인한 損失 = 38
• III. 計劃의 廢止나 變更으로 인한 損失 = 38
• 第2節 現行法에 規定된 損失補償 = 39
• I. 土地收用法에 있어서의 損失報償 = 39
• II. 補償에 대한 不服 = 40
• 第5章 結論 = 42
• ABSTRACT = 44
• 參考文獻 = 46