RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      How do institutional investors interact with sell-side analysts?

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T13692011

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This paper examines how institutional investors interact with sell-side analysts in Korean stock market. I focus on the role of institutional investors as sophisticated stock market participants who may analyze sell-side analysts’ information components as earnings forecast in addition to using their outputs as recommendation, target price. Furthermore, I examine whether institutional investors can differentiate between good information and bad information provided by sell-side analysts. By using a sample of 1,421 firm/year observations in Korean stock market from 2001 to 2011, the results indicate that institutional investors may take an active role as a mechanism to incorporate V/P ratios (value to price) derived from earnings forecast information to analyze sell-side analysts’ information components, in addition to using the outputs as recommendation. Moreover, I find that institutional investors are more likely to use sell-side analysts’ information when the earnings forecast is more accurate, meaning that institutional investors can differentiate between good information and bad information. On the other way round, I examine if institutional investors’ trading behavior affects sell-side analysts’ information, and find that sell-side analysts do not use information produced from buy-side investors’ trading behavior. In sum, I can conclude that the main results support the causality relationship that institutional investors trade by looking at the sell-side analysts’ information components as earnings forecast in detail, and by using their information only when the earnings forecast information is more accurate, not the other way round. This study can shed some lights on the knowledge about the unobserved interaction between the most sophisticated stock market participants who are considered to have taken a role to enhance stock market efficiency, and extends the prior literature which factors bring about institutional investors’ sophistication.
      번역하기

      This paper examines how institutional investors interact with sell-side analysts in Korean stock market. I focus on the role of institutional investors as sophisticated stock market participants who may analyze sell-side analysts’ information compon...

      This paper examines how institutional investors interact with sell-side analysts in Korean stock market. I focus on the role of institutional investors as sophisticated stock market participants who may analyze sell-side analysts’ information components as earnings forecast in addition to using their outputs as recommendation, target price. Furthermore, I examine whether institutional investors can differentiate between good information and bad information provided by sell-side analysts. By using a sample of 1,421 firm/year observations in Korean stock market from 2001 to 2011, the results indicate that institutional investors may take an active role as a mechanism to incorporate V/P ratios (value to price) derived from earnings forecast information to analyze sell-side analysts’ information components, in addition to using the outputs as recommendation. Moreover, I find that institutional investors are more likely to use sell-side analysts’ information when the earnings forecast is more accurate, meaning that institutional investors can differentiate between good information and bad information. On the other way round, I examine if institutional investors’ trading behavior affects sell-side analysts’ information, and find that sell-side analysts do not use information produced from buy-side investors’ trading behavior. In sum, I can conclude that the main results support the causality relationship that institutional investors trade by looking at the sell-side analysts’ information components as earnings forecast in detail, and by using their information only when the earnings forecast information is more accurate, not the other way round. This study can shed some lights on the knowledge about the unobserved interaction between the most sophisticated stock market participants who are considered to have taken a role to enhance stock market efficiency, and extends the prior literature which factors bring about institutional investors’ sophistication.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. INTRODUCTION 1
      • Ⅱ. BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS DEVELOPMENT 8
      • 2.1 Prior Literatures 8
      • 2.2 Hypothesis development 12
      • Ⅲ. RESEARCH DESIGN AND VARIABLE MEASUREMENT 19
      • Ⅰ. INTRODUCTION 1
      • Ⅱ. BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS DEVELOPMENT 8
      • 2.1 Prior Literatures 8
      • 2.2 Hypothesis development 12
      • Ⅲ. RESEARCH DESIGN AND VARIABLE MEASUREMENT 19
      • 3.1 V/P ratio in Earnings-Based Valuation Model 19
      • 3.2 Regression Equation 21
      • 3.2.1 The association between the institutional investors and sell side analysts forecast information 21
      • 3.2.2 The impact of institutional ownership change on a change in sell side analysts information 24
      • 3.3 Sample Selection 26
      • Ⅳ. MAIN RESULTS 28
      • 4.1 Descriptive Statistics and Univariate Analysis 28
      • 4.2 Multivariate Analysis 34
      • 4.2.1 The association between institutional investors and sell side analysts 34
      • 4.2.2 The impact of accuracy of sell side analysts earnings forecast on the interaction between institutional investors and sell side analysts 39
      • 4.2.3 The impact of institutional ownership change on a change in sell side analysts information 43
      • Ⅴ. SENSITIVITY TEST 46
      • 5.1 Full sample (2001-2011) including year 2008 46
      • 5.2 EPS/P, VOJ/P, VPEG/P as sell side analysts information 50
      • 5.3 Change variables (V/P, TARGET/P and RECOM) instead of level 56
      • Ⅵ. CONCLUSION 60
      • REFERENCES 62
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼