http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 발행기관 : 중앙대학교 호주학연구소 (검색결과 13 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
-
-
Leisure Patterns and Socio-Economic Determinants : A Study on Korean Immigrants in Western Australia
Sul, Sooyoung,Tcha, MoonJoong 중앙대학교 호주학연구소 2000 Journal of Australian studies Vol.7 No.1
Summary It is very difficult to find relevant literature which systematically analysed leisure patterns of ethnic groups in Australia, especially in Western Australia, although Australia consists of many different ethnic groups. This study investigates some important topics related to the leisure activity of Korean immigrants in Western Australia, which is, as far as I understand, the first attempt to analyse this ethnic group in Australia. From the exploration of data collected from 77 Korean immigrants in Western Australia, many valuable and notable findings were discovered. The issues raised and examined in this paper include their socio-demographic characteristics, measures of the degree of acculturation such as language and culture, current patterns of leisure participation, and the interrelation between all the variables mentioned previously. This study found that, overall, both the frequency of participation (how frequently each participant participates in the leisure activity) and the number of participants (how many immigrants participate in the leisure activity) are considerably low for most leisure activities. It is also found that the frequency of participation is the highest for Home based leisure activities, and the lowest for Sport activities. The frequency of participation in Social/entertainment/recreation activity is in between the two categories of leisure activities. In terms of the frequency or the number of participation, Korean immigrants and Australians show similar patterns (where the results for Australians are from other studies), however, Koreans prefer more inactive leisure activities. The two groups share five leisure activities among the top ten activities in terms of the numbers of participants. If the frequency of participation is concerned, the two groups share eight activities among top ten activities. In sport activities, overall participation (both in terms of frequency and the number of participants) is considerably low, especially for some sports which are popular in Australia, such as cricket, net ball and squash. The top five sport activities for Korean immigrants with the largest participants are swim/dive/water polo, fishing, golf, ten pin bowling and tennis. For these select activities, in contrast to other general sport activities, the frequency of participation is very high. Korean immigrants have a narrow selection of sport activities in terms of participation. However, once they participate, they show 'maniac'(highly intensive) patterns of participation in terms of frequency. It can be concluded that for relatively inactive leisure activities, where most of them are in Home-based and Social/entertainment/recreation activities, both Korean immigrants and Australians share similar patterns. However, for Sport activities, they are rather different: Korean immigrants participate in a relatively narrow range of sports compared to Australians, but their frequency for those sports is very high. The effect of socio-demographic characteristics of immigrants on leisure participation was found effective in a very limited degree. Participation into only 22 leisure activities (out of 88) was reported to be significantly correlated with the variation in at least one socio-demographic characteristic. It needs further investigation what other variables can explain the patterns of leisure participation better
-
Contemporary Australian Children's Literature
Honey, Elizabeth 중앙대학교 호주학연구소 2001 Journal of Australian studies Vol.8 No.1
The reason for my visit to Korea, with illustrator Ann James, is to attend the Third Australian Children's Book Fair in Kyobo Book Centre. This has been made possible by support from the Australia-Korea Foundation, The Australia Council, The Asialink Centre and by the indefatigable efforts of Mr In Sub Lim from The Choice Maker-Inter Australia Company, and I thank them all for this visit.
-
-
최재석 중앙대학교 호주학연구소 2001 Journal of Australian studies Vol.8 No.1
It took time that Australians accepted him as their mate and writer, because he was educated in England and lived for long there until he settled down at Castle Hill in 1948. Especially his novel is quire different from the old realism that his contemporary writers adhered, and he dismissed the Australian novel as "the dreary, dun-coloured offspring of journalistic realism." The Novel Prize, however, helped him and his country a great deal. In 1973 Patrick White became the first Australian writer to win a Novel Prize, a further mark of his role of establishing an international place for Australian writing. Moreover, the Prize enhanced Australian cultural standard, proclaiming to the world that Australia was no longer a rustic bush country with the legend of a penal colony, but a nation of high culture. He moved beyond the representational faith of realism to present individual mind and spirituality. In the early 1960s a shift begins to be apparent to an increasing preoccupations with isolated individuals, and now White became a strong influence and literary force. He led Australian writers of the next generation and opened the way to a new Australian novel. The novelists who have dominated Australian fiction since the 1960s - Thea Astley, Peter Carey, David Foster, Helen Garner, David Ireland, Elizabeth Jolley, Thomas Keneally, David Malouf- all display some debt to the fiction of Patrick White. This does not, however, amount to a tradition, but critics may argue about which novelist has earned the coveted mantle of White's greatness. White studies have been conducted concerning four elements since the early 1960s: language, the quality of his socio-moral discriminations, the religious and philosophical contexts of his thoughts, and the skepticism about the achievement in relation to the intention. Because The Tree of Man is a good introduction to understanding White's major novels' characteristics, its plot is introduced and it is analyzed to show its figurative language, "the extraordinary behind the ordinary" in the Parkers' life, the mystery, and Stan Parker's spiritual quests in the novel.
-
신정현 중앙대학교 호주학연구소 2001 Journal of Australian studies Vol.8 No.1
It wouldnt be a grouts exaggeration to say that the history of Australian literary criticism is one of the unspoken fear deriving from cultural complex of inferiority. It is true that Australian literary critics inferiority complex has made them continuously critical of and hard to live with some of Anglo-European literary traditions and Australian writers who received acclaim abroad. The person or people who feel inferior may overcome the feeling by trying to pursue some knowledge that somebody else has to go after it. However, Australia has produced no single critic or theorist of international stature, nor has it developed a distinct school of criticism or theory. It is no wonder that Australian literary criticism tended to be imitative and counter-discursive. Well into the twentieth century, the energy of Australian literary criticism was burnt up in anxiety to repell the idea that Australian writing is either inferior or second-rate. Austrlian literary critics of this time did not learn to bear with the things they couldn't change. To avoid self-pity, they were trying to show that their culture was as good as or better than those of their colonists. The result was the so-called "National Literary Project". Australian literary nationalism that had envisioned a literature distinguished by its Australianniss and found its voice in the Bulletin and Meanjin, had come to dominate Australia by the end of the 1940s and continued to dominate deep into the sixties as a prime determiner of the curse put on Australian literary criticism. Ironically enough, Australian literary critics had borrowed entire phrases from the 19th-century European nationalism and incorporated them into the European terms of literary realism to make their voice and to attack literary modernism. Many of Australian nationalist literary critics rejected, even ridiculed, the work of Patrick White, who was to be awarded the Noble prize in 1973. Though all of them did not find White's novels offensively un-Australian, many of them saw his metaphysical use of Australian materials as a threat to the realist tradition they admired and considered superior. Also, the works of Christina Stand have been largely ignored for the same reason. Even today, the critical situation in Australia has not changed in nature. If Meajin, which started publication in 1940, tirelessly promoted the national literature, Australian Literary Studies which was founded in 1963 is still devoting itself exclusively to Australian literature. Though Australia enters its third century of European settlement, its critical outlook did not mature at all. Nowadays, under the imposition of socialist realism, postcolonialism, multi-culturalism, and popularism, all of which are initiated and developed by European or American critics, Australian literary critics are giving themselves up entirely to scoffing at post-structural trends of criticism, which are considered "foreign" to their aesthetic beliefs.
-
-
-
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
