http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : M.D. and Young Don Lee (검색결과 3 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
홍성철,박승연,이영돈,Sung Chul Hong,M.D.,Seung Yeon Park,M.D. and Young Don Lee,M.D.,Ph.D. 대한갑상선-내분비외과학회 2009 The Koreran journal of Endocrine Surgery Vol.9 No.4
Purpose: The Delphian lymph node (DLN) has long beenregarded as a predictor of thyroid malignancy and indicator of advanced disease; however, there are a few published data in relation to the thyroid. Therefore we are to determine the significance of DLN involvement in differentiated papillary carcinoma. Methods: We prospectively assessed the discovering rate of DLN and the frequency of DLN metastasis in the consecutive patients undergoing total thyroidectomy with central neck node dissection at Endocrine Surgery Department of our hospital. And we assessed whether DLN involvement may predict extensive cervical lymph node disease and other unfavorable prognostic factors. Results: The DLN was separately removed and identified as such in 42 of 164 patients (25.6%), and 9 of 42 patients (21.4%) had DLN metastases. DLN involvement was not associated with larger tumor size (1.8 vs. 1.1 cm), age (41 vs. 46 years), perithyroidal tissue invasion (66.6 vs. 72.7%) and lymphovascular invasion. DLN involvement was highly predictive of central compartment metastasis (sensitivity 100%, specificity 41%), high proportion of metastatic nodes, and moderately suggestive of further disease in the lateral compartment (sensitivity 44%, specificity 92%). Conclusion: Although the clinical appearance of the DLN is not an accurate indicator of the presence of thyroid cancer, metastatic involvement of the DLN is an adverse prognostic marker in papillary thyroid cancer. The presence of DLN metastasis in patients with thyroid cancer should alert the surgeon to the high probability of advanced disease and need for paying greater attention to the central and lateral compartment lymph nodes. (Korean J Endocrine Surg 2009; 9:218-222)
-
갑상선 암에 있어서 경부림프절 절제술의 용어 및 분류에 관하여
이영돈,Young-Don Lee,M.D.,Ph.D. 대한갑상선-내분비외과학회 2012 The Koreran journal of Endocrine Surgery Vol.12 No.2
The standard radical neck dissection, introduced at the turn of the 20th century, became the uniformly-accepted treatment of cervical metastatic disease through the 1960s. Functional or modified radical neck dissection was developed in the 1950s and 1960s. This procedure became the accepted treatment for suitable tumors by the 1970s. Now, the concept of selective neck dissection, removal of only the node levels likely to be involved with tumor, gained acceptance by the late 1980s as a definitive elective, and eventually, therapeutic neck dissection for suitable cases. In response to the increasing variations of neck dissection procedures, a number of classification systems were proposed and subsequently established. The system of the American Head and Neck Society and the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery was revised in 2002 and 2008. The neck dissections are grouped into four broad categories: radical, modified radical, selective, and extended neck dissection. The Japan Neck Dissection Study Group presented a new system for the classification of neck dissections based on a system of letters and symbols. The system permits a comprehensive and shorthand method of precise designation of neck dissection procedure, but has the disadvantage of departing radically from previously employed systems, by utilizing an entirely new terminology and designation of lymph node groups. In 2011, an international group proposed a classification which conveys precisely the extent of the lymphatic and non-lymphatic structures removed in a neck dissection. So they contended it is logical, simple, and easy to remember, and prevents possible confusion associated with the ambiguous terminology previously mentioned. And they also maintained it allows the recording of neck dissection procedures that cannot be classified under the existing systems. In 2012, the American Thyroid Association proposed the consensus of lateral neck dissection in DTC. They defined again that a selective neck dissection refers to removal of less than all five nodal levels directed by the patterns of lymphatic drainage from the primary tumor while preserving CN XI, IJV, and SCM. And they also insist that selective neck dissection is the most commonly-used neck dissection in the management of lateral neck metastasis for thyroid cancer, and should be reported with a designation of the side and nodal levels and sublevels dissected (i.e. selective neck dissection of levels IIa, III, IV, and Vb). But most classification systems have some limitations and disadvantages to describe the exact procedures of lymphatic and non-lymphatic structure resection. It is a necessary component of a new systemic classification and nomenclature system for neck dissection, not only because the method of describing operative procedures must be unified to allow comparisons of therapeutic methods, but also because of the need to customize therapies individually. A new neck dissection classification system in thyroid cancer has to overcome all these limitations and will facilitate communication around the world with reliable reporting and comparison of outcomes among different surgeons and institutions. (Korean J Endocrine Surg 2012;12: 2-86)
-
조승만,이영돈,Seung Man Jo,M,D,and Young Don Lee,M,D 대한갑상선-내분비외과학회 2007 The Koreran journal of Endocrine Surgery Vol.7 No.2
Purpose: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy (SLNB) for patients with melanoma and breast carcinoma has been validated as an accurate method for assessing the status of lymph nodes. Although prophylactic modified radical neck dissection for patients with papillary thyroidcarcinoma is not performed routinely, central neck node dissection is currently considered to be part of the standard initial operation. Therefore, this study was conductedto determine the feasibility of SLNB for the evaluation of central neck lymph node status in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma. Methods: 116 patients (108 women, 8 men) preoperatively diagnosed with papillary thyroid carcinoma between 2004 and 2006 were prospectively studied. After 0.1 to 0.3 ml of 1.0% methylene blue dye was injected into the tumor, SLNB was performed, followed by total thyroidectomy and central neck node dissection. Results: Preoperatively, in cases of papillary thyroid carcinoma without evidence of cervical lymph node metastasis, the identification rate of SLN in level 6 compartments was 93.1%. In addition, the overall accuracy of SLN at predicting the nodal status was 91.7%. Furthermore, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive values were 85.7%, 100%, 100% and 83.3% respectively. Conclusion: The SLNB in the central compartment for papillary thyroid carcinoma is an acceptable and feasible technique for estimating the central neck lymph node status, therefore, it may be helpful in diagnosing metastases and avoiding unnecessary lymph node dissection in cases of papillary thyroid cancer. However further studies are necessary to improve the diagnostic accuracy prior to routine clinical use. (Korean J Endocrine Surg 2007;7:98-102)
KCI연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
