http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : Hamid Reza Pourghasemi (검색결과 1 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
Ahmed Mohamed Youssef,Biswajeet Pradhan,Hamid Reza Pourghasemi,Saleh Abdullahi 한국지질과학협의회 2015 Geosciences Journal Vol.19 No.3
This paper presents an evaluation of two bivariate statistical approaches, frequency ratio (FR) and weights-of-evidence (WoE) for landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) at south-western part of Saudi Arabia, Jizan region. Landslide locations were identified and mapped from interpretation of high resolution satellite images (GeoEye 0.5 m and QuikeBird 0.6m), topographic maps (scale of 1:10,000), historical records, and extensive field surveys. A total of 106 landslide locations were mapped using Arc- GIS software and divided into two groups, 75% and 25% of landslide locations were used for training and validation of models, respectively. Eleven landslide conditioning factors such as elevation, slope, curvature, aspect, lithology, topographic wetness index (TWI), normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), proximity to lineament, roads and rivers were considered in this evaluation. The effects of these factors on landslide occurrence were assessed using aforementioned bivariate statistical approaches. For validation, the models results were compared with landslide locations which were not used during the models building. Subsequently, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were established and area under the curves (AUC) was calculated for the landslide susceptibility maps using the success (training data) and prediction (validation data) rates. The results showed that the area under the curve for success rates are 0.861 (86.1%) and 0.839 (83.9%) and for prediction rates are 0.796 (79.6%) and 0.791 (79.1%), respectively for frequency ratio and weight-of-evidence models. The resulting landslide susceptibility maps showed five classes of susceptibility such as very high, high, moderate, low, and very low. The percentage of existing training and validating landslides data in high and very high zones of the susceptibility maps were calculated to be 90.02% and 76.03% for frequency ratio model and 88.33% and 79.3% for weight-of-evidence model, respectively. The results revealed that the frequency ratio and weights-of-evidence models produced reasonable accuracy. The resultant maps would be useful and can also help planners for general choosing favorable locations for development schemes, such as infrastructural, buildings, road constructions, and environmental protection.
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
