RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        지장물에 대한 보상과 철거의 법적 쟁점

        최종관(Jong Kwon Choi ),강신은(Shin Eun Kang) 중앙법학회 2015 中央法學 Vol.17 No.3

        「Act on acquisition of and compensation for land, etc. 「 for public works projects」(AACL) provides that project operator acquire and compensate for land etc. for public works projects. AACL, provides things in takings jurisprudence, is different from Civil act. Because the concept of things is messily provided, things is understood and provided in classified as things of in a narrow sense, obstacle, things of in a broad sense There is the opposition between relocation principle and acquisition principle for compensation of obstacle. AACL adopted the relocation principle. In view of the compensation practice and realistic changes for obstacle, however, relocation principle must be changed to acquisition principle. In case obstacle was determined a price compensation and given a relocation decision, the Supreme Court judged that project operator can’t acquire ownership. But project operator can remove obstacle at his ownexpense and owner must endure removal. Therefore, in case he did not acquire ownership and has lost obstacle, he did nor burden liability for damages. Even if the Supreme Court reached a right conclusion denying liability for damages of project operator, the process was not squarely logic leading to the conclusion. It was originated from illogical and unsystematic AACL. So the provisions of the takings and compensation for obstacle will be logically and systematically improved.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼