http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
임상에서 활동 중인 종양전문간호사의 직무분석 - DACUM 기법 이용
이은령(Lee Eun Ryung),곽미경(Kwak Mi Kyong),김은지(Kim Eun Ji),권인각(Kwon In Gak),황문숙(Hwang Moon Sook) 대한종양간호학회 2010 Asian Oncology Nursing Vol.10 No.1
Purpose: The purposes of this study were to identify job definition, duties and tasks of Korean oncology Advanced Practice Nurses (APNs) and assess frequency, importance, and difficulty for each of duty and task using the DACUM method. Methods: The DACUM committee was organized with nine oncology APNs. The committee documented the job definition, duties and tasks based on their daily job descriptions. Validity of the elicited duties and tasks was tested by a study team and 6 oncology APNs. Data were collected using a questionnaire survey from 53 oncology APNs. Results: The job description of oncology APNs was identified 12 duties and 66 tasks. Among the twelve duties, 'education for patients/families’ was the most frequently performed and was the most important duty. 'Case management’ was the most difficult duty. Among 66 tasks, 'providing education for patients/families’ was most frequently performed. 'Providing education for patients/families’ and 'assessing patient condition comprehensively’ were the most important tasks. 'Implementation research’ as the principal investigator was perceived as the most difficult task. Conclusion: In this study, Korean oncology APNs’ job performances were identified and analyzed. It is recommended that job description for oncology APNs needs to be standardized and reshaped in advanced way in future.
간호분야 실무지침의 수용개작 방법론에 따른 구강간호 실무지침의 개발
조용애 ( Yong Ae Cho ),은영 ( Young Eun ),구미옥 ( Mee Ock Gu ),김경숙 ( Kyung Sook Kim ),곽미경 ( Mi Kyong Kwak ),김정혜 ( Jeong Hye Kim ),이선희 ( Seon Heui Lee ),박동아 ( Dong Ah Park ),노화경 ( Hwakyung Noh ) 병원간호사회 2015 임상간호연구 Vol.21 No.2
Purpose: This study aimed to adapt the previously developed, high-quality oral care guideline for the usage in clinical settings in Korea. Methods: Guideline adaptation process was undertaken according to the guideline adaptation manual version 2.0 developed by National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency (Kim, et al., 2011) and the standardized methodology for nursing practice guideline adaptation (Gu, et al. 2012). Results: The adapted oral care guideline was consisted of 10 domains and 85 recommendations. The number of recommendations in each domain were: 4 general issues, 2 oral care indications, 10 oral assessment 16 general oral care, 15 oral care for critically ill, 15 oral care for cancer patients, 14 oral care for cancer patients withoral complications , 5 oral careeducation , 2 oral care referral, and 2 documentation and report. Ten point six percent of the recommendations were rated as grade A, 20.0% as grade B grade, and more than half (69.4%) were rated as grade C. Conclusion: The adapted oral care practice guideline is expected to included the evidence-based practice guidelines as fundamentalss of nursing practice. Dissemination of the developed guideline nationwide would contribute improving the efficiency of oral care practice.