http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
Anatomical Variation of the Glissonean Pedicle of the Right Liver
Weiguang Xu,Hee Jung Wang,Bong-Wan Kim,Yong-Keun Park,Guangyi Li 한국간담췌외과학회 2011 한국간담췌외과학회지 Vol.15 No.2
Purpose: Many studies have been conducted to date regarding whether the right hepatic vein is the accurate border that divides the anterior and posterior section of the right liver. It has been reported that the Glisson pedicle of the right liver may be an anatomical variation that does not have a consistent morphology. We analyzed the relationship between the true borders of the anterior and posterior sections, and the right hepatic vein, based on cadaver dissection and MD-CT image analysis of the anatomical variation of the Glisson pedicle of the right liver. Methods: Sixteen cadaver livers were available for dissection from the Department of Anatomy, and pre-operative MD-CTs of 20 donor livers who underwent living donor liver transplantation prior to December 2009, were obtained. We analyzed the 3D-relationship between the branches of the Glisson pedicles and the right hepatic vein of the right liver. They were divided into 3 groups according to the sliding pattern of the branches of the Glisson pedicle origin. When all segmental branches of the anterior pedicle arise from the main trunk of the anterior pedicle and all branches of posterior pedicle arise from the main trunk of posterior pedicle, it was designated as Group A (Normal Group). When a portion of the segmental branches of the anterior pedicle arises from the main trunk of the posterior pedicle, it was designated as Group B (Posterior dominant group). When a portion of the branches of the posterior pedicle arises from the main trunk of the anterior pedicle, it was designated as Group C (Anterior dominant group). Results: Among the 16 cadaver liver dissections, 6 cases were in Group A, 5 in Group B, and 3 in Group C. Two cases were excluded from the study because the inferior right hepatic vein was the main draining vein of the right liver. The analysis of preoperative MD-CT of the 20 donor livers showed that there were 13, 4, and 3 patients in Groups A, B, and C, respectively. Conclusion: According to Couinaud"s theory of anatomy, the right hepatic vein serves as the border between the anterior and posterior sections of the right liver. But, due to the frequent anatomical variations, an adequate understanding of the anatomical variations of the right Glisson pedicle should be necessary for liver surgery.
간이식에 있어서 간동맥 재건을 위한 미세혈관수술교육의 효과
허위광(Weiguang Xu),김봉완(Bong-Wan Kim),배병구(Byong-Ku Bae),왕희정(Hee-Jung Wang),김명욱(Myung-Wook Kim) 한국간담췌외과학회 2010 한국간담췌외과학회지 Vol.14 No.1
Purpose: During liver transplantation (LT), complications of the hepatic artery have been decreased because of microsurgery in reconstruction of hepatic artery has been widely adopted. However, in an early step of the LT program, hepatic artery reconstruction generally tends to be done with the help of a micro-surgeon from the the plastic surgery in most of Korean medical centers. In our center, we also have done reconstruction of the hepatic artery using a microscope and the skills of a plastic surgeon. We did this between Feb, 2005 and Jun, 2008 for liver transplantations. The increased the need for micro-surgeons in liver surgery as increased the cases of liver transplantation steadily. After training general surgeons of the surgical department who had no experience with microsurgery, we invested in the micro-surgery of hepatic artery reconstruction. Here we report the result of that investment. Methods: Liver transplant patients (n=176) were enrolled between Feb, 2005 and Jul, 2009. Between Jul, 2008 and Jul, 2009, 28 cases of reconstruction of the hepatic artery were done by a general surgeon who had micro-surgery training. Before training in hepatic artery reconstruction, the general surgeon spent 3 months being introduced to micro-surgery in the micro animal laboratory. Because the training was repeated, the surgeon became skilled in doing artery anastomosis using rat’s abdominal aorta. At the same time, we trained a plastic surgeon to do hepatic artery reconstruction during liver transplantation as the first assistant. From Jul, 2008 to the present time, the general surgeon was exclusively in charge of hepatic artery reconstruction during liver transplantation. Hepatic artery reconstruction was done using a microscope. Stitching was done using 8-0 or 9-0 nylon, and an interrupted end-to-end anastomosis was done. After hepatic artery reconstruction, artery flow was confirmed by ultrasonic doppler. For group A patients, left lobe grafts were used in 33, right lobe grafts in 73, dual grafts in 6, and whole liver grafts in 36. Results: For group B patients, left lobe grafts were used in 1 and right lobe grafts in 21, while whole liver grafts were used in 6. In Group A, hepatic artery complications occurred in 5 cases (3.3%), and in Group B such complications did not occur (0%). There was no statistical difference (p=0.312). Conclusion: For hepatic artery reconstruction, during micro-surgery under a surgical microscope, it is thought that it is best to invest in a general surgeon who has been trained in micro-surgery. We suggest that a general surgeon is suitable for hepatic artery reconstruction after only a short time of micro surgery training.
In-Gyu Kim,Weiguang Xu,Hee-Jung Wang,Yong-Keun Park,Bong-Wan Kim 대한외과학회 2013 Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research(ASRT) Vol.85 No.6
Purpose: Studies of liver anatomy have developed alongside clinical achievements, as these types of research complement each other. The aim of this study is to determine whether or not the portal vein branches (P4d) in ‘Nagino’s trisectionectomy’ exist, and to examine their characteristics using cadaver dissection. Methods: From April 2012 to July 2012, 31 adult cadavers were delicately dissected. We defined a ‘NewGP’ as an extra glissonian pedicle (GP) other than the traditional GPs that supply segments II, III, IVa, and IVb in the ordinary direction, and anatomically located superior to the umbilical fissure (UF). Results: We identified ‘NewGPs’ based on the UF and UF vein. The incidence of ‘NewGPs’ was 30/31 (96.8%). The diameter of the ‘NewGPs’ ranged from 3.5 to 5.6 mm, which was not significantly different from that of traditional GPs (II-, III-, or IV-GP), which have diameters ranging from 3.7 to 9.7 mm. Conclusion: We think that the P4d in ‘Nagino’s trisectionectomy’ correspond to the ‘IVa NewGP’ and the additional pedicle. We believe the clinical significance of the ‘NewGP’ is to complement the traditional II, III, IVa, and IVb pedicles in supplying the liver.