http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
Diogo Turiani Hourneax de Moura,Marvin Ryou,Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux De Moura,Igor Braga Ribeiro,Wanderlei Marques Bernardo,Christopher C. Thompson 대한소화기내시경학회 2020 Clinical Endoscopy Vol.53 No.4
Background/Aims: The diagnosis of biliary strictures can be challenging. There are no systematic reviews studying same-sessionendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-based tissue sampling and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needleaspiration (EUS-FNA) for the diagnosis of biliary strictures. Methods: A systematic review was conducted on studies analyzing same-session EUS and ERCP for tissue diagnosis of suspectedmalignant biliary strictures. The primary outcome was the accuracy of each method individually compared to the two methodscombined. The secondary outcome was the accuracy of each method in pancreatic and biliary etiologies. In the meta-analysis, we usedForest plots, summary receiver operating characteristic curves, and estimates of the area under the curve for intention-to-treat analysis. Results: Of the 12,132 articles identified, six were included, resulting in a total of 497 patients analyzed. The sensitivity, specificity,positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and accuracy of the association between the two methods were: 86%, 98%, 12.50,0.17, and 96.5%, respectively. For the individual analysis, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of EUS-FNA were 76%, 100%, and94.5%, respectively; for ERCP-based tissue sampling, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 58%, 98%, and 78.1%, respectively. For pancreatic lesions, EUS-FNA was superior to ERCP-based tissue sampling. However, for biliary lesions, both methods had similarsensitivities. Conclusions: Same-session EUS-FNA and ERCP-based tissue sampling is superior to either method alone in the diagnosis of suspectedmalignant biliary strictures. Considering these results, combination sampling should be performed when possible.