http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : Sam W. K. Yu (검색결과 2 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
Sam W. K. Yu,Liam Foster,Ruby C. M. Chau,Anna M. Y. Lee 한국사회복지학회 2017 Asian Social Work and Policy Review Vol.11 No.3
This paper examines the use of defamilization and familization measures to develop an analytical framework to inform the search for ways to improve women’s opportunities to accumulate pension income. This framework is associated with the use of the adult worker model. Three main analytical tasks are presented. Firstly, we discuss different interpretations of what defamilization entails. Based on these different views, two types of defamilization measures utilized by the government are identified: care-focused and economic defamilization. Secondly, with reference to different definitions of the adult worker model, we develop a framework for identifying ways to make the provision of the government’s defamilization measures and its alternatives (care-focused and economic familization measures) more effective in assisting women to accumulate pension income. Thirdly, using the case of Hong Kong, we demonstrate the application of this analytical framework.
-
Defamilization/familization measures and women’s pension income—The case of Taiwan
Ruby C. M. Chau,Liam Foster,Sam W. K. Yu,Yuk Pun Yu 한국사회복지학회 2017 Asian Social Work and Policy Review Vol.11 No.2
This paper examines how defamilization and familization measures can affect women’s capacity to accumulate pension income and their subsequent standard of living after retirement. Firstly, it highlights the concepts of defamilization and familization and discusses the potential of these measures in assisting women to save pension income through the “commodification” and “decommodification” of labor. Secondly, it examines the major pension policies and examples of defamilization and familization measures in Taiwan. It shows how the current limited provision of such measures could create “double jeopardy” for women, affecting access to paid employment or resources to enable women who wish to undertake caring responsibilities to do so, ultimately impacting their capacity to accumulate pension income. Thirdly, it suggests ways to strengthen defamilization and familization measures in order to enable women to accumulate sufficient retirement income on the basis of three preconditions: policy attention to the reciprocal relationship between familization/defamilization measures and pension schemes for women; a recognition of differences between women in their preferred strategies to accumulate pension income; and an emphasis on a life course perspective to understand the double jeopardies faced by women in saving for retirement.
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
