RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        JENDL-4.0 Integral Testing for Fission Systems

        R. D. McKnight,Kazuteru Sugino,Go Chiba,Yasunobu Nagaya,Kenji Yokoyama,Teruhiko Kugo,Makoto Ishikawa,Shigeaki Okajima 한국물리학회 2011 THE JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY Vol.59 No.23

        Benchmark testing for the newly developed Japanese evaluated nuclear data library JENDL-4.0 is carried out by using a huge amount of the integral data. Benchmark calculations are performed with the continuous-energy Monte Carlo code with a large number of neutron histories or with the deterministic procedure which has been developed for fast reactor analyses in Japan. In the present paper, representative benchmark results are shown as a rapid report. They are the results for criticality of low enriched UO_2 or MOX fueled light water moderated systems, of uranium or plutonium fuelled solution systems, of various fast reactors, and results of PIE analyses for a PWR spent fuel and actinoide samples irradiated in fast reactors.

      • KCI등재

        New Benchmarks versus Old Benchmarks: A Comparison of the ICSBEP and CSEWG Benchmarks

        R. M. Lell,R. D. McKnight 한국물리학회 2011 THE JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY Vol.59 No.23

        This paper presents results of validation calculations for a series of fast critical assemblies based on the traditional CSEWG benchmark models and the more current ICSBEP benchmark models. Benchmark results, based on continuous-energy Monte Carlo calculations using both the CSEWG and ICSBEP benchmark representations with various evaluated nuclear data libraries, are presented for 18 critical assemblies. Results are put on a comparable basis by applying corrections associated with each of the benchmark specifications allowing consistent comparison of the validation results from each model. For some of the assemblies, significant differences are observed in the C/E values. It is also observed that the bias between these models is dependent on the evaluated data libraries. More importantly, the comparisons extend beyond the calculated results and attempt to identify the extent of the differences in the benchmark models themselves, identifying differences in masses, compositions, geometry, and dimensions. Overwhelmingly, these small model differences occurred with the introduction of necessary modeling simplifications into the older models. The ICSBEP models, though limited to testing of criticality (k_(eff)), often contain more details of the experiment (and therefore introduce fewer simplifications into the models) and generally include more detailed assessment of the benchmark uncertainties, making these benchmarks of higher value for data validation.

      • KCI등재

        Application of AFCI Covariance Data to Uncertainty Evaluation of Fast System Integral Parameters

        W. S. Yang,G. Aliberti,R. D. McKnight 한국물리학회 2011 THE JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY Vol.59 No.23

        This paper presents the application results of the AFCI-1.2 covariance data to the uncertainty evaluation of the main integral parameters of a series of fast systems with different fuel types, coolants, and transuranic element conversion ratios. Using generalized and depletion perturbation theory methods, sensitivity coefficients were calculated for the multiplication factor, Doppler coefficient, coolant void worth, and burnup reactivity swing. The uncertainties of these integral parameters were evaluated with the AFCI-1.2 covariance data and compared with those obtained with the BOLNA covariance data. The overall uncertainties estimated with the AFCI-1.2 data were generally comparable with those obtained with the BOLNA data. However, relative to the BOLNA data, the AFCI-1.2 data resulted in significantly increased contributions of ^(238)Pu fission and ^(241)Am fission cross sections, but significantly reduced contributions of ^(244)Cm fission, ^(238)U capture, ^(56)Fe inelastic scattering, and ^(10)B (n,α) cross sections.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼