http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
Звукоподражательные слова эвенского языка (для сравнительного анализа с другими алтайскими языками)
Elena NESTEROVA 한국알타이학회 2008 알타이학보 Vol.0 No.18
This article is devoted to describing the onomatopoeic words of the Ėven language. The Ėven language is rich of the vocabulary which reflects the sounds of the nature, the singing and cries of birds, the howling of wolves, the growling of wild animals, the sounds produced by the nature such as thunder, the howling of wind. While studying this theme, we have found out the classification of onomatopoeic words of the Ėven language. Here we should say that this classification may not be complete. In the future, it may undergo changes due to the further work in studying the onomatopoeic words of the Ėven language. The separate onomatopoeic words of the Ėven language follow the phonetic norms of the Ėven language not always. In this regard they keep aloof. They are the Ėven native words notwithstanding it. One may suppose that this layer of vocabulary was closer to the Altaic commonality. During the work we have found out the following thing: some onomatopoeic words of the Ėven language are similar to the onomatopoeic words of the Sakha language (of the Turkic language family) by their phonetic and semantic signs. In order to demonstrate it, we have given the examples.
Pullagurla, Swathi R.,Witek, Małgorzata A.,Jackson, Joshua M.,Lindell, Maria A. M.,Hupert, Mateusz L.,Nesterova, Irina V.,Baird, Alison E.,Soper, Steven A. American Chemical Society 2014 ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY - Vol.86 No.8
<P/><P>We report the design and performance of a polymer microfluidic device that can affinity select multiple types of biological cells simultaneously with sufficient recovery and purity to allow for the expression profiling of mRNA isolated from these cells. The microfluidic device consisted of four independent selection beds with curvilinear channels that were 25 μm wide and 80 μm deep and were modified with antibodies targeting antigens specifically expressed by two different cell types. Bifurcated and Z-configured device geometries were evaluated for cell selection. As an example of the performance of these devices, CD4+ T-cells and neutrophils were selected from whole blood as these cells are known to express genes found in stroke-related expression profiles that can be used for the diagnosis of this disease. CD4+ T-cells and neutrophils were simultaneously isolated with purities >90% using affinity-based capture in cyclic olefin copolymer (COC) devices with a processing time of ∼3 min. In addition, sufficient quantities of the cells could be recovered from a 50 μL whole blood input to allow for reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) following cell lysis. The expression of genes from isolated T-cells and neutrophils, such as <I>S100A9</I>, <I>TCRB</I>, and <I>FPR1</I>, was evaluated using RT-PCR. The modification and isolation procedures demonstrated here can also be used to analyze other cell types as well where multiple subsets must be interrogated.</P>
Armais Albertovich Kamalov,Nikolay Ivanovich Sorokin,Vitaly Kazichanovich Dzitiev,Andrey Alekseevich Strigunov,Olga Yurevna Nesterova,Ilya Vladimirovich Bondar 대한비뇨의학회 2024 Investigative and Clinical Urology Vol.65 No.2
Purpose: To compare perioperative, functional, and safety outcomes between thulium fiber laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuFLEP) and bipolar enucleation of the prostate performed by a single surgeon with use of propensity score (PS)-matched analysis. Materials and Methods: Data were from 675 patients, 422 of whom underwent ThuFLEP and bipolar enucleation by a single highly experienced surgeon. ThuFLEP was performed with Fiberlase U1 (IRE Polus Ltd.). Perioperative parameters, safety, and functional outcomes, such as International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), postvoid residual volume (PVR), and maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) were assessed. To control for selection bias, a 1:1 PS-matched analysis was carried out using the following variables as covariates: total prostate volume, preoperative IPSS and early sphincter release. Results: Of 422 patients, 370 (87.7%) underwent ThuFLEP and 52 (12.3%) underwent bipolar enucleation. Operation, enucleation, and morcellation time were comparable between groups before and after PS-matched analysis (p=0.954, p=0.474, p=0.362, respectively). Functional parameters (IPSS, QoL, PVR, Qmax) were also comparable between groups at every time point before and after PS matching. Significant improvements in IPSS, QoL score, Qmax, and PVR were observed during the 24-month follow-up period for both ThuFLEP and bipolar enucleation without any significant differences between groups. Early and late postoperative complications before and after PS-matched analysis were similar. Conclusions: ThuFLEP was comparable to bipolar enucleation in perioperative characteristics, improvement in voiding parameters, and complication rates. Both procedures were shown to be effective and safe in the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia.